What's new

South Africa v Pakistan | 4th ODI | Durban | 21/3/13 | Pakistan innings

Status
Not open for further replies.
I thought Kamran was not not performing because he was batting down the order?What happened here....
 
Well it's all going to plan for farhat

Drop a sitter, Gets hafeez run out, now puts pressure on partner to score while he defends...
 
ViciousMachine said:
Can you tell me which game you watched? Cause there was NO PROOF that Kleinveldt TOUCHED that ball, NO obvious touch, NO deviation that could be seen. Benefit of doubt goes to BATSMAN, thats the LAW of cricket.

No way he was run out EITHER game
Click to expand...
I saw it and felt he had touched it though slightly.

Agree under the rules he shouldn't have been given out for it.

This all he did was threw it at Hafeez when running. Was ridiculous. Almost as if they were trying to take advantage of the obstruction rule.
 
Akmal fans now please come here and defend him with your stupid arguments for his stupid shots these 2 brothers will never learn. Now this 234 looks like 334 for us.
 
Kami walking off very slowly does he need a change of nappy? Anyways Farhat to get 50+
 
Is it just me or are these commentators super-biased towards South Africa? I mean it is fine that they are South Africans and they will have a natural inclination towards their country, but there is no need to be so obvious. Pakistani fielders pulled off some stunners near the boundary and they could only comment on how well the South Africans ran 3. When South Africa fielded brilliantly near the boundary, they went on and on about how brilliant they were.
 
Kami a.k.a. Bradman out in his typical and pathetic fashion. What a loser. Always throws his wicket away in the same fashion.
 
We hav seen this from Kamran before, getting some width and just slashing them straight to the fielder. You know if you hit in catching heigt SA won't drop you. Either go over the infield or keep it down. Just smashing with no plan will hurt you.

And now they will make a mess of this chase.
 
siccric said:
Is it just me or are these commentators super-biased towards South Africa? I mean it is fine that they are South Africans and they will have a natural inclination towards their country, but there is no need to be so obvious. Pakistani fielders pulled off some stunners near the boundary and they could only comment on how well the South Africans ran 3. When South Africa fielded brilliantly near the boundary, they went on and on about how brilliant they were.
Click to expand...

Yes and it's getting pathetic.
 
i do not see pakistan winning this game...good luck to them anyway!
i am going to my job!
 
WebGuru said:
Akmal fans now please come here and defend him with your stupid arguments for his stupid shots these 2 brothers will never learn. Now this 234 looks like 334 for us.
Click to expand...

LOL exactly. Just wait till the Kami fan brigade arrives...they will come up with the most retarded excuses to defend his senseless and retarded batting
 
siccric said:
Is it just me or are these commentators super-biased towards South Africa? I mean it is fine that they are South Africans and they will have a natural inclination towards their country, but there is no need to be so obvious. Pakistani fielders pulled off some stunners near the boundary and they could only comment on how well the South Africans ran 3. When South Africa fielded brilliantly near the boundary, they went on and on about how brilliant they were.
Click to expand...

completely disagree! When hafeez was given run out, both RSA commentators said "that is harsh" first. Obviously for their audience, they had to later say how the rule was changed and how maybe it was out.

Look at cricinfo. I left the website out of their bias. Sid doing commentator for it is "that is clearly out"!

Gimme the RSA commentators over a stupid Cricinfo "neutral" person any day!!
 
Guess what, We are in the same position SA was in, Their run rate is consistent though which we lack.
 
6 from 23 for sir bradman farhat...

Difference between them and us... we drop dollies while they catch catches with 0.47 seconds reaction.
 
Wow after 13 years Farhat has learnt didly squat!!!
 
Leeon1994 said:
Guess what, We are in the same position SA was in, Their run rate is consistent though which we lack.
Click to expand...

It is all the same idiot, Farhat.

he has played 26 balls, 23 have been dots, 1 leg bye, 1 single (the run out) and a 4.

If ANYBODY from this forum went, we would play better than Farhat. Complete idiot.
 
farhat trying to make it interesting Misbah loves the way farhat tuks thats why he dropped Nasir for this tuk tuk
 
YK shouldn't take the single so early. Got to keep the strike. Farhat will just block out 5 balls.
 
steyn dropped the catch on purpose... he knew as long farhat stayed they, he would make sure saffers win it.
 
Selfish batting, playing for their spots in the team, wasting balls.
 
ViciousMachine said:
completely disagree! When hafeez was given run out, both RSA commentators said "that is harsh" first. Obviously for their audience, they had to later say how the rule was changed and how maybe it was out.

Look at cricinfo. I left the website out of their bias. Sid doing commentator for it is "that is clearly out"!

Gimme the RSA commentators over a stupid Cricinfo "neutral" person any day!!
Click to expand...


Mike Haysman is quite fair, I'll give him that. That other guy on right now - I keep forgetting his name - has destroyed my mute button.
I've not been following Cricinfo lately, but yeah, their commentators can be annoying, specially when India is playing.
 
Imran Farhat 7 off of 27 balls (playing in power play) would be nice to have his wicket taken now
 
What was it smith called farhat in Afrikans in the test match... I think it's time for choice words in afrikans again
 
farhat 9 for 30.... he is playing slow for his spot.... the sad part is he crosses 20 they will give him the spot.
 
ViciousMachine said:
completely disagree! When hafeez was given run out, both RSA commentators said "that is harsh" first. Obviously for their audience, they had to later say how the rule was changed and how maybe it was out.

Look at cricinfo. I left the website out of their bias. Sid doing commentator for it is "that is clearly out"!

Gimme the RSA commentators over a stupid Cricinfo "neutral" person any day!!
Click to expand...

Cricinfo has always been very Pakistan supportive throughout this tour. they have always called out harsh decisions when the commentators were supporting South Africa. I dont know which website you have been reading though. BTW this is the actual cricinfo commentary

Tsotsobe to Imran Farhat, 1 run, OUT, flicked away from off, with the angle, and they are appealing for obstructing the field. This is placed to the right of long leg, Farhat is adamant about the second, Hafeez is slow to turn, and he starts running with half an eye on the throw coming from the keeper to the bowler, and is hit by the throw. Hafeez has altered his course only slightly, but that is good enough to rule a batsman out under the new playing conditions. Hafeez is livid as he goes back; possibly he feels he didn't alter significantly or intentionally but he did alter the line of running if only slightly. First man to be given out obstructing the field after the new playing conditions were introduced
Click to expand...
 
siccric said:
Mike Haysman is quite fair, I'll give him that. That other guy on right now - I keep forgetting his name - has destroyed my mute button.
I've not been following Cricinfo lately, but yeah, their commentators can be annoying, specially when India is playing.
Click to expand...

Cricinfo hates India after their run in with BCCI. In fact they always make snide remarks about DRS, etc
 
Indiafan said:
Cricinfo has always been very Pakistan supportive throughout this tour. they have always called out harsh decisions when the commentators were supporting South Africa. I dont know which website you have been reading though. BTW this is the actual cricinfo commentary
Click to expand...

Yeah their cartoon mockery of PCB awards described their support for Pakistan :facepalm
 
We can't go at 2.78 in the first 10 overs. Required rate is already 5. It'll be like chasing 300 soon enough.
 
CalculatedRisk said:
Younis Khan playing yet another directionless, pathetic, inning
Click to expand...

I gotta disagree with you here. As long as YK is at the crease, I have hope. He can def milk Peterson, and Peterson has to ball 10 overs. Guarantee you that is his plan.

Whats getting me frustrated is Farhat. He is scoring at 2 an over and I doubt he has any game plan.....

And dropped twice basically now (both one each)
 
tuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuk tuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuk tuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuk tuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuk tuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuk tuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuk tuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuk tuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuk tuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuk tuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuktuk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

The Bald Eagle
South Africa (183/9) secure an 11-run victory against Pakistan (172/8) in the 1st T20I to go 1-0 up in the 3-match series
13 14 15
Replies
1K
Views
20K
BouncerGuy
BouncerGuy
Cricket Warrior
Pakistan (329) defeat South Africa (248) by 81 runs to clinch the 3-match ODI series by an unassailable lead of 2-0
21 22 23
Replies
2K
Views
39K
SpiritOf1903
SpiritOf1903
FearlessRoar
South Africa finish Day 1 at 82/3 after Pakistan posted 211 in the first innings of the first Test match
13 14 15
Replies
1K
Views
26K
topspin
topspin
FearlessRoar
New Zealand (308/4) defeat South Africa (304/6) by 6 wickets to register their spot in the final of Tri-Nation ODI series 2025
2
Replies
131
Views
5K
BouncerGuy
BouncerGuy
Cricket Warrior
South Africa (210/3) defeat Pakistan (206/5) by 7 wickets to clinch the 3-match T20I series by an unassailable lead of 2-0
10 11 12
Replies
894
Views
21K
BouncerGuy
BouncerGuy
Back
Top