Tayyab and Saud are ready. They’ve grinded in the domestic for 3-4 seasons
Saud has been ready for a while. In fact, he himself is a victim of the "not ready" theory. Not too sure about Tayyab though. Agha is a much better option.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Tayyab and Saud are ready. They’ve grinded in the domestic for 3-4 seasons
Has potential to be our Lara however as he is not in any friendship circle he will receive the Fawad, Sarfraz treatment
He will replace Babar and Rizwan in the opening spot firstHe will eventually replace Fakhar. Dynamic talent.
I just saw some highlights posted above.
It seems like the kind of shots he’s playing he’d only be able to do that against third rate trundlers.
I don’t see a lot of technique and spark, but it won’t matter at the end of the day if his reflexes can handle 140-145kph pace and he can dispatch such bowlers to the boundary.
I want him to open and play international cricket, he can’t be worse than Rizwan and Imam as he looks to attack at least.
But fans have to calm down a bit, there might be disappointment or he could really do well against good bowling. Let’s see.
There's hardly a comparison between the two, Sayim is an immensely talented player known for his classy shot selection, whereas Haris appears to play more like a tapeball player.Saim is better than Haris he has better temperament and more shots.
Haris has all the shots. Just needs experience and patience. Smashing nortje, rabada etc is no joke. He's our 360 player. I hope he gets a county contract.There's hardly a comparison between the two, Sayim is an immensely talented player known for his classy shot selection, whereas Haris appears to play more like a tapeball player.
I wonder sometimes how harris got selected for International Cricket.
Haris relies on power and doesn’t care who the bowler is.There's hardly a comparison between the two, Sayim is an immensely talented player known for his classy shot selection, whereas Haris appears to play more like a tapeball player.
I wonder sometimes how harris got selected for International Cricket.
Power becomes all ineffective when you are unable to enhance your game.Haris relies on power and doesn’t care who the bowler is.
He's young he has issues with his shot selection but that'd the way he plays and in t20s it will work but not in odis agreed Saim plays more classy shots both play in the top 3 for the psl team.Power becomes all ineffective when you are unable to enhance your game.
His shot selection is horrible but look at saim ayub how elegantly he plays his shots! always a delight to watch.
not necessarily. Australian batters for example typically debut around 27/28. Either way, Saim needs to nail down another 1-2 seasons. Don’t need another Haider Ali situationSaud has been ready for a while. In fact, he himself is a victim of the "not ready" theory. Not too sure about Tayyab though. Agha is a much better option.
not necessarily. Australian batters for example typically debut around 27/28. Either way, Saim needs to nail down another 1-2 seasons. Don’t need another Haider Ali situation
There is no evidence of international batters being successful with “little to no FC” experience. The reality is the exact opposite. Very rarely is there an exception to this rule.Sigh, I'm generally too lazy to write long posts but this is one of my pet peeves so have to debunk this now.
When you have a player (or for that matter a new entrant in any field) who shows signs of being a prodigy you should try to nurture them in a way that will magnify their talents and increase the chance of their success. In this case, will playing domestic cricket on dead tracks against third-rate attacks add anything to Saim's game? It might, but there is a higher probability that it will make his game worse. Had he been someone more suited for the longer version there might have been some merit to this claim but for LOIs you really don't need much experience these days given how similar the conditions and pitches are.
International cricket and not just Pakistan cricket is replete with examples of young talented cricketers with very little FC experience making their mark on the game. Take Pakistan's top international scorers and almost all of them started international cricket in some form within 1 or 2 seasons of domestic cricket. The only exception, strangely, is Babar Azam which has more to do with the selection policies of that era rather than anything else. Similarly, all top 10 international scorers (barring Dravid) played just one or two domestic seasons before starting their international careers. Look at bowlers and you will find a similar pattern. Interestingly, on this forum and generally in cricket discussions in Pakistan this point is usually reserved for young batsmen and never applied to young pacers. For quick bowlers we want to induct them in the team even before they play any domestic cricket but for batsmen you will always hear the refrain "they should first get some domestic experience". Did Shaheen or Naseem or Rauf come in with a lot of FC experience? Did they swim or sink? Good talent mostly finds its way through. As for Haider Ali, he did not fail because of lack of FC experience but because of his own temperament and because of how he was handled by the management. He was forced into an unnatural batting position without any defined role and labelled as a T20 batsman.
The only time when this theory makes sense is when you have a world class squad like the Australian team of the 90s and/or a very competitive domestic circuit which closely mirrors international conditions. Which brings me to your point about Australian cricketers. And even this is not completely accurate. Ricky Ponting, Steve Smith, David Warner were all fast tracked into international cricket. The most recent example is Cameron Green. Most of the 27/28 year old batters you are referring to are from the generation where they had an irreplaceable top order and hence the limited opportunities for players like Law, Blewett and Hodge etc. each of whom would have easily made it into any other team.
Pakistan does not have the luxury of such a deep talent pool so we have to ensure that we maximize the talent that we do have. If a youngster shows potential he should be given more opportunities to hone his talent and in Pakistan that will only happen by bringing him on the international team or at least by being on the Shaheens sqaud. In the long run you will always be better off putting your money on a prodigious youngster than an FC toiler.
There is no evidence of international batters being successful with “little to no FC” experience. The reality is the exact opposite. Very rarely is there an exception to this rule.
No one, specially batter should never be allowed near the international team until they’ve played enough seasons to build a good temperament and arrive as near-ready products.
There is no evidence of international batters being successful with “little to no FC” experience. The reality is the exact opposite. Very rarely is there an exception to this rule.
No one, specially batter should never be allowed near the international team until they’ve played enough seasons to build a good temperament and arrive as near-ready products.
You don’t need to provide any examples. This is the most obvious fact that 95% of the batters who have done well in the past had already impressed in domestics. India rewards its FC and List A performers like Gill, who has already played much more list A and FC than most Pak batters. Look at SKY, KL, Iyer, Kishan all have played TON of FC and List A.Just gave you more than 20 examples. Do you want me to list all of them individually?
Don’t mind CPL as long as he also plays 4 day. FC is most important for his devI agree but what is Saim doing in CPL then, when we have an FC tournament going on. Shouldn't PCB be selective about which players they allow and when to play these leagues?
Although CPL has third class bowling, it’s still better than nothing. He was thoroughly tested vs Afghanistan and mostly struggled against newbies at the Emerging Asia cup. Doesn’t give confidence to me that he’s ready for the big boys based on a few shiny knocks in CPL. Don’t be deceived.Don’t mind CPL as long as he also plays 4 day. FC is most important for his dev
You don’t need to provide any examples. This is the most obvious fact that 95% of the batters who have done well in the past had already impressed in domestics. India rewards its FC and List A performers like Gill, who has already played much more list A and FC than most Pak batters. Look at SKY, KL, Iyer, Kishan all have played TON of FC and List A.
Even mythical figures like Inzi. Little known fact is that even Inzi had two back2back prolific domestic list A tournaments in 90 and 91 before 92 WC started.
Pak needs to ensure a proper process and pathway to develop and reward talent. This eye test BS doesn’t scale.
Key player if he's allowed to play as an opener.What an amazing tournament for him. He is definitely gonna key player for next T20 WC.
His FC and List A stats are below average. He needs to play atleast 2 complete seasons in order to be judged for selection in national team for ODI or test. However he is ready for T20
As a player he should be comfortable to play anywhere in top 4. But yes for the future WC, he should be opening along with Rizwan or Babar.Key player if he's allowed to play as an opener.
Opening is the easiest job in t20 they should let Saim start at that position. Captain Babar should bat 1 down take responsibility and to the tougher job of carrying the side in middle overs
50 over is completely different game, any below par performance would have shattered his confidence. He has age on his side, post WC need to be regular member of Pak team in white ball cricket. This will allow him to gain more international experience by the time next WC arrives.I think the best thing about his innings today was how he battled it out against Narine and then took apart salamkheil. He was lucky against Narine got dropped twice by the keeper, but it was a tough pitch and he stuck it out. Should have been a wildcard pick for the WC squad.
Fakhar was regularly playing domestic cricket since 2015 and was among the top performers. He was never included in national side on the basis of PSL. He doesn't have good stats in PSL either, when u compare it with international career.It is an absolute travesty that this guy has not been selected ESPECIALLY with the absolutely despicable form that Fakhar has been in of late.
If Fakhar was lighting up the world on fire, or at least relatively consistent, I would understand. But to not even include him in the reserves? An absolute travesty.
The bogus argument that T20 performances are not the criteria for ODI selection has been refuted by Fakhar himself who was selected for the CT on the back of T20 performance — and ended up winning it for us.
There are so many players in the squad Saim could replace.
Fakhar was regularly playing domestic cricket since 2015 and was among the top performers. He was never included in national side on the basis of PSL. He doesn't have good stats in PSL either, when u compare it with international career.
No this is just an assumption and doesn't have any data to back. Fakhar in 2016-17 QAT season smashed 663 runs which included mammoth century (170) in finals. He had average of 49 in list A career before he was bought into CT tournament and replaced Shehzad. Pertinent to reiterate, he had just 1 half century in PSL at the time of his ODI debut and since he had already made international appearance in T20 where had just scored 26 in 3 matches he played.To say Fakhar wasn’t included in the CT team because of his PSL performances is a complete misrepresentation.
If his List A stats were so important, why had he never been selected before his PSL heroics right before the CT?
Pakistan, as it does now, severely lacked any modern day batsmen in 2017. Shehzad and Azhar Ali were batting like they were playing in the 60s so Pakistan recruited Fakhar in a desperate attempt to have some firepower as Fakhar had shown potential to bat quick in the PSL.
Therefore, PSL/T20s is definitely the standard to select players.
Babar has other ideas and you know that very well.Him and Fakhar together could be perfect
No this is just an assumption and doesn't have any data to back. Fakhar in 2016-17 QAT season smashed 663 runs which included mammoth century (170) in finals. He had average of 49 in list A career before he was bought into CT tournament and replaced Shehzad. Pertinent to reiterate, he had just 1 half century in PSL at the time of his ODI debut and since he had already made international appearance in T20 where had just scored 26 in 3 matches he played.
So saying he was selected purely on the basis of PSL performance is completely wrong, he was rather PCBs long term plan for ODIs which had no influence of PSL performance.
Khalid and sharjeel were mainly for t20s before getting caught for fixing. Azhar still continued even after Fakhar's debut as he was a replacement for Shahzad. Yes Asif, Shadab, Hasan were all fast tracked to national team on the basis of PSL performance, however guys like Fakhar, Babar, Imam are purely domestic products.Thanks for sharing that data. However, as you will also remember, the PCB were desperately trying different openers who showed any promise for attack play, but to no avail.
Khalif Latif, Sharjeel, Azhar, to name a few. Fakhar did not have many big scores in the PSL but he had shown potential with some attacking performances.
Similarly, Asif Ali was selected in the back of PSL performances despite no big scores in the PSL itself.
You really can’t think of a reason Saim wasn’t picked other than Karachi vs Punjab politics?To select an undercooked Abdullah Shafique over Saim Ayub is laughable.
I don’t like to believe in Punjab vs Karachi politics but if this ain’t politicos then I don’t know what else to call it.
You really can’t think of a reason Saim wasn’t picked other than Karachi vs Punjab politics?
I don’t think the selectors are being naive.Inzi is probably worried that Saim’s quality will generally replace Imam …and I say this as an actual Imam fan.
Theres not much else I can think of other than our selectors just being ridiculously naive. Saim Ayub is a breath of fresh air that this Pakistan side needs like oxygen right now.
Just watch the video posted above and watch the six he hit against Andre Russel. I haven’t seen a Pakistani batsman being able to play a world class pacer that well before.
Saim, Haris, Abdullah are all undercooked. We are desperate trying to rely on youngsters with hardly any experience who aren’t even properly dominating in domestic cricket. Only one is Abdullah in tests, which is his more natural game.To select an undercooked Abdullah Shafique over Saim Ayub is laughable.
I don’t like to believe in Punjab vs Karachi politics but if this ain’t politicos then I don’t know what else to call it.
Considering how poor the bowling has been this year and how easy the pitches are to bat on, if he plays a few games he could boost his average massively.Saim needs this year in FC and play long innings.
Never cease to amazeI don’t think the selectors are being naive.
They have been incompetent in not playing him beforehand.
But now is not the time to pluck Saim out of thin air and throw him to the wolves, telling him it’s time to swim otherwise he’ll have 200 million people on his back.
They’d just be compounding their mistakes and we’d be risking ruining a talent like they did with Haider.
Been curious to see more of Saim Ayub's batting given the recent talk of him being in the World Cup squad. These are only observations from YT highlights, I haven't seen enough of him live.
His footwork is even more static than Sharjeel's. He's nothing like Saeed Anwar - the only similarity is they're both left handed openers. A clean hitter when the ball's in his arc. Looks strong through midwicket and can play those dinky T20 style shots too.
However that stance could be problematic against good length balls outside off. He nicked off from Farooqi in the 2nd T20 vs AFG after shovelling a similar ball onto his stumps trying a scoop in the previous game. Infact in these clips there's hardly any scoring shots against such deliveries.
There's also a massive gulf between the calibre of bowlers in the CPL and World Cup. WI have declined as a T20 outfit over the last two years.
I'm not saying he hasn't any talent but looks very much in a work in progress and is definitely not ready for a 50 over World Cup right now.
Why not? He's playing excellent cricketing shots with a lot of confidence and when you see our current top order he could easily replace Fakhar Zaman since Saim is also capable of playing an aggressive style of play.He is not ready yet
If Babar was the captain in 1992, Inzi wouldn't have been ready either.He is not ready yet
Inzamam had a lot of first class success, he needs to perform in first class as well.If Babar was the captain in 1992, Inzi wouldn't have been ready either.
Thank you for posting this.Inzamam had a lot of first class success, he needs to perform in first class as well.
I've noticed this habit from Misbah that for all his seemingly levelheaded nature, he goes from one extreme to the other with selections.so misbah wanted saim ayub in the team
Been curious to see more of Saim Ayub's batting given the recent talk of him being in the World Cup squad. These are only observations from YT highlights, I haven't seen enough of him live.
His footwork is even more static than Sharjeel's. He's nothing like Saeed Anwar - the only similarity is they're both left handed openers. A clean hitter when the ball's in his arc. Looks strong through midwicket and can play those dinky T20 style shots too.
However that stance could be problematic against good length balls outside off. He nicked off from Farooqi in the 2nd T20 vs AFG after shovelling a similar ball onto his stumps trying a scoop in the previous game. Infact in these clips there's hardly any scoring shots against such deliveries.
There's also a massive gulf between the calibre of bowlers in the CPL and World Cup. WI have declined as a T20 outfit over the last two years.
I'm not saying he hasn't any talent but looks very much in a work in progress and is definitely not ready for a 50 over World Cup right now.
He should be part of the test squad for Australia. Though I realize he won’t be