- Joined
- Oct 2, 2004
- Runs
- 217,746
Time for our own vote!
So Trump the Obnoxious OR Crooked Hillary?
So Trump the Obnoxious OR Crooked Hillary?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Looking forward to seeing Trump in the office.
So far 14 votes for Hillary and 7 for Trump, is it safe to say 14 votes from Pakistanis and 7 from the neighbors ?
Two of the worst candidates in one election.
What a time to be American.
You can click on the numbers to check who voted for whom.
Nothing wrong with Hillary, one of the most qualified candidate ever to run for US president, in recent history. Not if you take that email garbage too seriously.
I did and most of the name for Trump sound non-Pakistani Sachin, Zak-fan, Anuk and something like this.
Not a surprise, his anti-muslim remarks have caught their attention. No wonder they elected their own trump in India.
The Indian brigade in the USA will always vote for the one who says the most anti-Pakistani things, this is just the way these people are programmed by the Indian media. Even if Trump were to become President much of what he is saying will be forgotten. He is talking of building a wall on the Mexican border to keep illegal Mexicans out making them pay for it. This is one of the things he will turn his back on.
It seems like all the Pakistanis forgot how vindictive Hillary or should I say Killary was in the late 2000s/early 10s
Not really. Indian-Americans tend to be more liberal, I'm only talking about the ones that grew up here of course, not the fobs.
View attachment 70321
You mean this one? some people have been living under a rock.
I candidate who has no chance of winning would say anything. BTW he is anti-immigrants and Indians are no exception.
Either way, US is doomed Kinda want to see Trump win so I can see the amount od damage he can really inflict
I always thought Canadian were our friends.
From what I hear most Indian-Americans are with Trump due to his anti-Pakistani and pro-Indian views. This does not make much of a difference in any way, Pak doesn't give a damn either way.
Muslims are against terrorism more than any other ethnic group in USA, as they are the worsts victim of it. Hence, they are supporting Hillary, who will be able to control the things better than Trump who would would make it worst. There are two classes of Indian, graduates and non-graduates. Majority of the graduates are supporting Hillary.Hillary is actually more likely to hold pro-Indian views. If Indian-Americans are with Trump, it is definitely due to his stance on Islamic terrorism.
View attachment 70321
You mean this one? some people have been living under a rock.
Vindictive is the wrong word, she was frustrated with Pakistan and rightfully so. Anyways should you even care about that? You're American and whoever gets elected will have a direct affect on your life. It is pretty foolish to be against her just because she has said something about Pakistan.
Indians who think Trump and his supporters are their friends, are deluded. White supremacists will look down on Indians even worse than Muslim immigrants from the mideast.
Actually a reporter of Indian Chanel NDTV got served by a Trump supporter yesterday. Maybe that changed her mind a bit about Trump. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trump-supporter-microphone-journalist-rally_us_580b7bdde4b0cdea3d87c502
I might vote for her this week, but there's a reason why she's known as crooked hillary can't forget her hypocritical and corrupt ways as well as the drone wars.
I don't get this "Trump is anti Muslim so let's vote for Clinton" rhetoric. Sure Trump has said some ridiculous and bigoted things and isn't fit for the office of POTUS but putting aside what they say look at what Obama, Clinton et al actually do to Muslims. Their actions in Libya, Syria, Iraq, Yemen etc have led to the deaths of numerous innocent civilians. Then there is their drone programme - blowing up innocent civilians in Afghanistan and Pakistan is hardly a progressive and liberal thing to do.
So whilst Trump may say bad things about Muslims and foreigners at least he doesn't have any blood on his hands.
And for the record if I had the opportunity no I wouldn't vote for him.
Two of the worst candidates in one election.
What a time to be American.
If trump wins it will be better.
Hillary is actually more likely to hold pro-Indian views. If Indian-Americans are with Trump, it is definitely due to his stance on Islamic terrorism.
He's obviously not going to have any "Muslim blood on his hands" sitting in the boardroom of the Apprentice.
Give him one term and he'll be bathing in it. He thinks all of those drone programmes and bombing raids in the Middle East aren't enough !
Anyway as for the OP - its not a question of if Clinton wins - but how big the margin of victory will be. I hope all this talk of how Clinton is dominating in the polls won't lower turnout and cause the Democratic base to rest on their laurels.
Down-ballot is more interesting - can the Democrats retake the Senate ? That is critical for Clinton to have a smooth Supreme Court nomination process. House likely to stay red.
tbh Obama has been the worst for muslims
ramped up drone attacks and killed so many innocent Pakistanis.
hope he pays for it some day that commie
tbh Obama has been the worst for muslims
ramped up drone attacks and killed so many innocent Pakistanis.
hope he pays for it some day that commie
Care to explain how will it be better, and for which group of people?
nationalist are better than globalist, it will be better for american people and the world.
So the guy who is saying that he will bomb the Middle East like no tomorrow is going to be better for the world? Mind you to an utterly ignorant knob like Trump, Pakistan also lies in the Middle East.
How is he going to be better for the Americans? The guy is already alienating black, asian and hispanic Americans, or in your mind a typical American is a tall white guy with blond hair?
i will support anybody who comes down hard against islamic terror. this is the most violent ideology the world has seen since nazism - killing of apostates and infidels, barbaric punishments right from the medival times, extreme gender inequality..this ideology is built on bigotry,discrimination and an extreme case of superiority over others.
the one good thing about nazism was that it was somewhat limited to certain parts of the world and could be defeated (or at least controlled) by conventional methods of war. islamism has now spread to all parts of the world and cannot be contained or reasoned with.
the funny thing is that i do agree with liberal views on gender, marriage equality, abortion, economy etc. but islamic terror is something that cannot be ignored as what hillary is doing. this is an evil that has to be stamped out for the good of the mankind.
Nazism let to world war, millions died.
ISIS is probably the easiest ideology to contain.
- stop supporting dictators by western world
- stop invading and turning muslim majority countries in to ground zero
- stop using fear to run your political campaign
- stop turning your citizens bigots to gain votes.
- solve Israel and Palestine issue.
Nazism let to world war, millions died.
ISIS is probably the easiest ideology to contain.
- stop supporting dictators by western world
- stop invading and turning muslim majority countries in to ground zero
- stop using fear to run your political campaign
- stop turning your citizens bigots to gain votes.
- solve Israel and Palestine issue.
I'm assuming he's a true nationalist and will stop fighting isreal wars for her in the middle east.
Hillary is actually more likely to hold pro-Indian views. If Indian-Americans are with Trump, it is definitely due to his stance on Islamic terrorism.
American University professor Allan Lichtman has correctly predicted the results of every presidential election since 1984. Interestingly, though, his method does not rely on polls, demographics or an analysis of swing states. Rather, Lichtman has developed 13 keys to predicting the election based on the performance of the party currently in the White House.
Lichtman says his 13 keys to predicting the results of the presidential election are simply ways of “mathematically and specifically” measuring that performance. They are: (1) incumbent-party mandate, (2) incumbency, (3) third party, (4) short-term economy, (5) long-term economy, (6) nomination contest, (7) policy change, (8) scandal, (9) social unrest, (10) foreign or military success, (11) foreign or military failure, (12) incumbent charisma, and (13) challenge charisma.
As for the results of this election, Lichtman says 2016 has been the hardest race he’s ever attempted to predict. When the author of “The Keys to the White House” appeared on CBSN in June, he had yet to make his call. However, since then, he has doubled down on a Trump win on November 8th.