What's new

WTC Final | India v New Zealand | Southampton | 18-22 June, 2021 | Pre-match thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sharma is probably India's best bowler in English conditions, it would be remiss if he isn't selected for the WTC final. So Bumrah, Siraj, and Sharma should be the first choice seam attack.

If Shami is to play, it depends on whether the pitch merits the selection of two spinners.

It doesn't matter what the pitch is, India will play Jadeja and Ashwin together regardless hereafter unless they encounter an absolute green mamba like the Wanderers wicket that India got a few years back where even one spinner would be waste of a spot.

India's team combination has gradually evolved over the past 3 years. Earlier India felt that a pace bowling all rounder was a must for winning overseas tours and flirted with the prospect of turning Pandya into their Stokes two years back, but the problem with that was firstly Pandya was far from being a Stokes level test cricketer and secondly, Pandya's frail back and shoulder didn't allow him to bowl consistently. The ditching of that plan all started in 2018 when Pandya missed the Australian tour through injury but India never felt his absence as they went on to win the series by going the Australian way of picking 6 batsmen, a keeper and 4 bowlers (Vihari slotting in as the no.6 batsman and bowling partime off spin).

And now it has changed to the current Indian strategy of picking Ashwin and Jadeja together regardless, as they are two of their best match winners and the Indian management feels India would have the best chance of winning with both playing together than them competing for one spot. India in the past used to have a huge dilemma on whether to pick Ashwin or Jadeja as their lone spinner in overseas tours. But with Jadeja taking his batting to a next level (believe it or not, statistically he has been India's best batsman in the last two years or so), slotting Jadeja in at no.6 ahead of Vihari became a no brainer as Jadeja contributes in all three disciplines unlike Vihari who bowls friendly off spin and is a sluggish fielder. Jadeja is the key that holds the Indian line up together and I doubt India is dropping either Jadeja or Ashwin (after his success with the ball in the Australian tour) in the near future unless the batting of Jadeja or bowling of Ashwin drops badly.
 
Just to give a perspective of how vital Jadeja is to the Indian line up..

F35uzpYaAQBUumNNSL9kpCTVPvu71ZwVOJBe5hBoYqA.jpg

These are genuinely ATG level stats as an all rounder, even if only for a three year period. He is arguably the MVP in test cricket, especially when you consider his electric fielding as well.
 
India.

The GOAT Asian Test team and the GOAT Asian Test captain will make history by lifting the inaugural WTC and further cement their legacy.

As always, marvelous insights and prediction. Looking forward to the WTC.
 
'EVENLY MATCHED BUT NZ MIGHT HAVE AN EDGE' – BRETT LEE ON ICC WORLD TEST CHAMPIONSHIP FINAL


Former Australia speedster Brett Lee in a candid chat about Test cricket and the upcoming ICC World Test Championship 2021 final between India and New Zealand.

Would you please share with us your favourite Test memory…?

My favourite Test match has to be my Test debut in 1999 at the MCG; Boxing Day Test against a very formidable Indian team, and then bowling to Sachin Tendulkar. It had everything that I had dreamed of and more! But my favourite Test memory was the Test series of 2005 with England. When I think about it, the second Test of the series at Edgbaston where Australia lost by two runs has to be up there as one of my favourites. I was out there in the middle with Michael Kasprowicz. Even though Australia lost, just the way the game was played. The fashion in which both teams performed. They were so competitive, yet so respectful with each other off the field. The way that the crowd was involved, everything was on the line. It was an amazing series. Well, a lot of people say, how come you pick a series where you lost? And I can say that it is the way you play. You do not have to win a game of cricket always to enjoy it. As long as you give it your best and England were too good for us at the time on that day.


Who is your favourite Test batter and why?

My favourite Test batters from the time that I was playing would be Sachin Tendulkar and Brian Lara. Brian Lara was simply so flamboyant. You could bowl six balls to him in the exact same area, let us say at the top of the off stump, if I aimed at that spot for six consecutive deliveries, someone like a Brian Lara would hit me down the ground, he could work me behind square, he could cut me behind by a point, he could drive through the covers, he could hit me straight down the ground to the offside. He is so unpredictable, whereas you look at a guy like Sachin Tendulkar, if I bowl a full edge side off stump, then I knew he could hit me through extra cover, or if I bowled straight through the off stump, he would cut me down the ground through mid-off. If I bowl on leg stump, he would hit me through the wicket, if I bowled short, he would either cut or pull me. So, both were technically great batsmen I have played against. With Sachin, you knew where the ball was going to go, but you had to sop the ball. He had an amazing cricket technique, a great temperament, and a brilliant cricket brain. When you look at the recent greats, it is hard to look past Virat Kohli. What an incredible record he has got. He is only getting better with age. He has got a great mindset, a great cricket brain as well.


Who is your favourite Test bowler and why?

Well, my favourite bowler at the moment is probably Pat Cummins. And you might think that I am biased being an Aussie or because he was a former teammate of mine, but what I will say about Pat Cummins is that he is absolute quality. I mean, the skills he has got. He has got a great technique. He has got a wonderful bag of tricks up the sleeve. And he is the guy that I think that is earmarked to be a future Australian captain, whether or not that happens. I mean, that is just great to be sort of spoken about in that context. But to me, he is a guy that challenges the bat more often than most bowlers I see around the world. Look at guys like Jasprit Bumrah. Incredible, he can take wickets consistently. But probably my favourite one at the moment would have to be Pat Cummins.


WTC final is one of its kind, a standalone Test match with such high consequence. Do you think this unique circumstance is going to impact how the teams prepare for the challenge? Because they are also playing on a neutral ground?

Yeah, well, look, it is going to be. Firstly, it is great to see the actual format, as you mentioned before about the World Cups, and there is a big prize of winning a, 50 over World Cup or a T20, whichever you want to call it, but there is nothing for a Test match, you might get the number one Test ranking, which is great. But this is an opportunity now to find out, which is going to be the best team currently around the world and it is a great opportunity. It is a neutral venue with no home advantage, so, when you think about who has got a chance of winning, you have got to say, I think it comes down to bowlers, I think the batsmen will generally be okay on the surface, but if they bowl well, whichever side bowls well, I think they will have the biggest impact.


Do you think the fast-bowling talent around the world is as strong as it has ever been? I mean, you spoke about Cummins earlier, from New Zealand there's Trent Boult, Tim Southee, Neil Wagner, Kylie Jamieson, India's Bumrah – you think it is the best that it has ever been?

In terms of collectively from all teams, I mean, looking at the ones that we have not even mentioned, when you mentioned Bumrah, Ishant Sharma, Mohammed Shami, Mohammed Siraj, I love. I think he is a great bowler. If you look at England, then you think about Broad and Anderson, I mean, they are world-class. Jimmy Anderson has got over 600 Test wickets; Stuart Broad is not too far behind him. Archer who has just gone in for operation from what I hear, I mean, he is quality as well. What I want to see though is to see guys go over 150 kms more consistently. So, we have got semi-good bowlers here that can get to 150 and above, but I want to see them do that more consistently because I believe that is a benchmark for genuine fast bowling.


Who do you think holds the edge between the two playing teams India, New Zealand?

Well, it is a tough one, you would have to see which bowlers can produce on this surface. And when you spoke about the Indian Test line-up, that will be on show; they have got some amazing talent as do the Kiwis. So, I think it is pretty evenly matched there. I am thinking though with the experience of New Zealand because they have bowled in conditions which are similar back home, you talk about the ball moving around, you talk about something in the wicket, there will be a bit of something, it may be conducive to fast bowling, to swing bowling. So that is where I think that the Kiwis might have an advantage purely from that fact. Now from a batting point of view, both sides have got batsmen that can play against swing bowling. But I think it comes down to bowling. I think whichever team bowls best will win the Test match final.


Can you tell us more about the Duke ball, how it behaves in England? And is it going to impact the game in any way?

Yeah, look, what we know about the Duke ball is that it talks. And what I mean by that, is that it moves around, there is an expression the fast bowlers use, that makes the ball talk, make the ball do something, not just go straight up and down. Now, we know that when you go to England when you bowl with the duke ball, that is what happens, the ball does swing around. So, it can be, as I mentioned before, guys that have bowled with the duke ball and have some good experience of bowling in swinging conditions like New Zealand, may be better suited to bowling with the duke ball. Because if you do not quite get the ball right, if you do not get the seam position correct, then the ball cannot swing around. And that is where you bowl a lot of wides and extras. We all know that if you play in England, and you do not quite get the right areas and you can go for a lot of runs. And batsmen from both teams will be looking to pounce on loose balls. I think of Kane Williamson I think of Virat Kohli, so, if you do not get it right to those two batsmen from straightaway, you are going to get hurt. So, it is all well and good for the ball to swing around. But if you do not control it, then you are not going to be successful.


What about the Hampshire Bowl as a venue?

I think that it will be a venue that will offer a lot from a pitching perspective, it is not a super-fast wicket. I think there will be enough there for the bowlers. But I just hope it is a nice playing surface, I think that that is what they will provide.

The Kiwis have had this amazing luck with an International Trophy they have been so close so many times. What do you think, is the motivating factor that the team might have to just make it this time? What do you think is going on in the camp right now?
Yeah, it is funny when journalists say that, and you hear commentators say it too. They just have to know and understand that these are the issues, but it is how they deal with it. I think it is very important that a lot of these teams can get through that mindset. If you have not been able to lift that trophy, and you have not won that series, or you have not won that World Cup, you have come so close, it can play on your mind. I think for someone like New Zealand and Kane Williamson, they have just got to believe in themselves. And believe in their defence in terms of their batters, their top five, and believe that they can win it. So, I think this has probably been the best opportunity. I think they've got a great side, and they are playing in conditions that might suit them. But there is a lot on the line.


Virat has always emphasized the importance of Test cricket, he has never won an ICC trophy or a championship? So, this will be his first time if he does win. How driven do you think he is to win?

Both captains would want to raise a trophy at the end. In terms of the Indian skipper, Kohli, he is such a dynamic player, such a great influencer for the team, world-class batter. We know that that's a given. But I think that with his emphasis on how important Test cricket is to him, and his team, and his nation, it is going to weigh in very heavily on him and that will improve his performance. We know that Kohli steps up on the big occasions. And, as you mentioned, he wants to see his side be the first winners of the ICC World Test Championship. It means a lot to him. And I think that will be the talk. Once everything is said and done, once the preparations are done, when they arrive there when the quarantine is done, just before they walk out, I think that will be the last comment - Let us enjoy it but let us become the first side to ever to win this ICC World Test Championship!


What do you think about the two different styles of captaincy that you see between Kane and Virat?

Yeah, they are different. Kane is a lot more conservative without being boring. He has got a great cricket brain. I spent a fair bit of time with Kane recently and enjoy his company. I think he has got a wonderful cricket brain. I admire his level of calmness. And that is why I said that he is not a boring captain. He is a conservative captain, but attacks when he needs to. And he attacks when he feels it is right. Because he is patient, and it works for him and his team. Look at the other side of the ledger, and you look at Kohli, he is more of an aggressive captain. There is no right or wrong answer to any of these because I have played under captains who are conservative and captains who are too aggressive. But this is going to be a great opportunity to see which one comes out on top because they are different. At the end of the day, they are two amazing cricket brains. And that is what I respect. So yeah, it is going to be exciting to see who comes out on top!


Boult & Bumrah are teammates at Mumbai Indians. Can that camaraderie dilute rivalry? Also, can it help one understand the other's bowling secrets better?

Look, I think the friendship will be there. But after they step out over the rope and before they step on the field it will be different. When you get out there, it is war. It is a battle, and you are playing for your country. That will not change. I think that is with Boult and Bumrah, they know each other so well, they know each other's strengths, but they also know each other's weaknesses. So, I think that sort of counterbalances what might be a situation where it could help or hinder someone. I think it is great for world cricket, that you look at these two wonderful players, and they are world-class, Boult hoops a ball back in 140 Ks. Jasprit Bumrah can make that duke ball swing around corners. They will be very mindful of what each person can bring to the table. And I am sure after the game, there will be a few hugs as well!


What do you think is the future of Test cricket?

I have got no doubt that it will be successful. I have got no doubt that people will want to be able to compete for the ICC World Test Championship. I mean, it has got a nice ring to it. We compete for a World Cup when it comes to T20, 50-over cricket, why not Test cricket? Do not just go on, winning different stats, let us put the two best teams up against each other in a precious situation and see which one comes out on top. I think it has got a lot of merits.

ICC
 
If the pitches stay flat then I think India will have a strong chance and should go on to win it.
 
Can someone explain to me why the venue was changed from Lord's to Southampton?
 
Man, I don't know how Indians are going to play swing.

They are awful against lateral movement.

And bowlers will be rusty.

Just hoping we are in some form.
 
Can someone explain to me why the venue was changed from Lord's to Southampton?

The decision was made with regards to the probability of another flare-up of the virus in the UK leading to a lockdown. They deemed it prudent to hold the match behind closed doors at a venue with an on-site hotel.
 
The decision was made with regards to the probability of another flare-up of the virus in the UK leading to a lockdown. They deemed it prudent to hold the match behind closed doors at a venue with an on-site hotel.

Okay. But why the Rose Bowl? Headingly and Old Trafford have on-site hotels too. And if they were doing the final behind closed doors why wasn't the same done for the New Zealand series?

If anything, the Rose Bowl should have been an undesirable venue due to the fact that matches there are notorious for being rained out.

Hate to act like a conspiracy theorist here. But the decision to hold the final on the one ground in England that is notorious for being dry and offering something to the spinners strikes me as conspicuous.
 
Okay. But why the Rose Bowl? Headingly and Old Trafford have on-site hotels too. And if they were doing the final behind closed doors why wasn't the same done for the New Zealand series?

If anything, the Rose Bowl should have been an undesirable venue due to the fact that matches there are notorious for being rained out.

Hate to act like a conspiracy theorist here. But the decision to hold the final on the one ground in England that is notorious for being dry and offering something to the spinners strikes me as conspicuous.

There are only two grounds with on-site accommodation facilities in the UK: Old Trafford and the Rose Bowl. The weather in Manchester is more unreliable than Hampshire.

The WTC final is organized by the ICC, not the ECB, and crowd decisions are subject to approval of the UK government. With the removal of a lot of coronavirus restrictions at sporting events over the last few weeks, a small crowd (about 4,000) is now allowed for the final.

It's not a conspiracy, the ICC had to protect their event from the risk of another virus outbreak.
 
Last edited:
There are only two grounds with on-site accommodation facilities in the UK: Old Trafford and the Rose Bowl. The weather in Manchester is more unreliable than Hampshire.

The WTC final is organized by the ICC, not the ECB, and crowd decisions are subject to approval of the UK government. With the removal of a lot of coronavirus restrictions at sporting events over the last few weeks, a small crowd (about 4,000) is now allowed for the final.

It's not a conspiracy, the ICC had to protect their event from the risk of another virus outbreak.

Is it really though? Because all I know is that Old Trafford has seen results in every test match played there in the last 7 years. Whereas, the Rose Bowl, just last year saw two test matches ruined by rain.

The fact that the ICC is responsible for making this decision only makes me believe more in the conspiracy because if there's one place where the evil empire has the most influence, its the ICC.

Its pointless to speculate any further since there is no evidence to prove otherwise but I'm not ready to believe that the evil empire didn't want the Rose Bowl as the venue for the final.
 
Is it really though? Because all I know is that Old Trafford has seen results in every test match played there in the last 7 years. Whereas, the Rose Bowl, just last year saw two test matches ruined by rain.

The fact that the ICC is responsible for making this decision only makes me believe more in the conspiracy because if there's one place where the evil empire has the most influence, its the ICC.

Its pointless to speculate any further since there is no evidence to prove otherwise but I'm not ready to believe that the evil empire didn't want the Rose Bowl as the venue for the final.

After a 4 month hiatus in international cricket due to lockdown during the first wave, Southampton was the venue where international cricket first made the return when England hosted the Windies and that was primarily due to the bio secure bubble created within the premises of the stadium due to its attached five star hotel. Southampton hosted 3 tests with Old Trafford hosting the remaining 3 tests in that summer against West Indies and Pakistan.

It's true that Old Trafford also has an on site attached hotel, but the following factors weigh in favour of Southampton:

1. The most important reason being that Manchester has one of the highest rates of covid within England while Southampton has far lesser cases when compared to Manchester. Manchester is one of the covid hotspots while Southampton is one of the safer regions.

2. The Rose Bowl is located on the outskirts of the city and therefore much safer with regards to the maintenance of bio secure bubble as compared to Old Trafford which is more closer to the city centre where covid prevalence is relatively high.

3. While there's no question as to which ground has more history behind it, the Rose bowl is a much newer stadium with state of the art facilities available and is considered a more modern stadium when compared to Old Trafford which is far older and was considered an obsolete stadium before its renovations.

4. It's true that Southampton has had tests interrupted by weather in the last decade, but the Old Trafford is historically known for its notorious rain and is considered one of the wettest cricket grounds in England. The weather in the south of England is in general much more predictable than in the north anyway.

Also it's not as if Southampton is a bunsen burner. The pacers have been more successful in Southampton than spinners in the last five years barring that match when Moeen Ali ran through India in 2018. Last summer, Holder dismantled England; and Broad and Anderson were very successful in the two rain interrupted tests against Pakistan.
 
India stand no chance against Trent Boult Southee and Jamieson.No way New Zealand losing this one and India always lose in England.It will be one sided match.
 
Man, I don't know how Indians are going to play swing.

They are awful against lateral movement.

And bowlers will be rusty.

Just hoping we are in some form.

The problem has never been swing per se. It's usually seam movement that kills us. However, NZ play swing the best and so even if the pitch is flat and the Dukes swings in the air , we will lose because NZ play swing better than us.
 
If the pitch is dry, India has by far superior team

If pitch is green or match sees rain/cloud, NZ has the deadlier attack.

Most likely wkt will be typical true deck with some help on day 1 for seamers and by day 4 turn out of rough.

NZ will fancy their chances to land big knockout blow up front on day 1 and use day 2-3 to turn screw in. India will know that longer the game lasts the more their strengths will come into play (quality spinner, game changing 4th inns players like Kohli, Pant).

Hoping for a good even contest that goes into day 5
 
After a 4 month hiatus in international cricket due to lockdown during the first wave, Southampton was the venue where international cricket first made the return when England hosted the Windies and that was primarily due to the bio secure bubble created within the premises of the stadium due to its attached five star hotel. Southampton hosted 3 tests with Old Trafford hosting the remaining 3 tests in that summer against West Indies and Pakistan.

It's true that Old Trafford also has an on site attached hotel, but the following factors weigh in favour of Southampton:

1. The most important reason being that Manchester has one of the highest rates of covid within England while Southampton has far lesser cases when compared to Manchester. Manchester is one of the covid hotspots while Southampton is one of the safer regions.

2. The Rose Bowl is located on the outskirts of the city and therefore much safer with regards to the maintenance of bio secure bubble as compared to Old Trafford which is more closer to the city centre where covid prevalence is relatively high.

3. While there's no question as to which ground has more history behind it, the Rose bowl is a much newer stadium with state of the art facilities available and is considered a more modern stadium when compared to Old Trafford which is far older and was considered an obsolete stadium before its renovations.

4. It's true that Southampton has had tests interrupted by weather in the last decade, but the Old Trafford is historically known for its notorious rain and is considered one of the wettest cricket grounds in England. The weather in the south of England is in general much more predictable than in the north anyway.

Also it's not as if Southampton is a bunsen burner. The pacers have been more successful in Southampton than spinners in the last five years barring that match when Moeen Ali ran through India in 2018. Last summer, Holder dismantled England; and Broad and Anderson were very successful in the two rain interrupted tests against Pakistan.

Well those all sound like fairly valid points. Hopefully its a balanced pitch that offers something for everyone and the weather doesn't play spoil-sport.
 
Is it really though? Because all I know is that Old Trafford has seen results in every test match played there in the last 7 years. Whereas, the Rose Bowl, just last year saw two test matches ruined by rain.

The fact that the ICC is responsible for making this decision only makes me believe more in the conspiracy because if there's one place where the evil empire has the most influence, its the ICC.

Its pointless to speculate any further since there is no evidence to prove otherwise but I'm not ready to believe that the evil empire didn't want the Rose Bowl as the venue for the final.

You are conjuring a conspiracy theory out of no where. They have not selected Rose Bowl because it will assist Indian spinners but bcoz its a relatively covid safe zone. If anything, India's record in Southampton is very poor.

Also, NZ is playing 2 tests in Eng just before the WTC. Dont you think it is giving advantage to Kiwis? Imagine if it was India, you would be crying ICC conspiracy theory by now from rooftop....LOL.
 
You are conjuring a conspiracy theory out of no where. They have not selected Rose Bowl because it will assist Indian spinners but bcoz its a relatively covid safe zone. If anything, India's record in Southampton is very poor.

Also, NZ is playing 2 tests in Eng just before the WTC. Dont you think it is giving advantage to Kiwis? Imagine if it was India, you would be crying ICC conspiracy theory by now from rooftop....LOL.

Well you know the thing about conspiracy theories, which is that alot of them have turned out to be true over the years.
 
Well you know the thing about conspiracy theories, which is that alot of them have turned out to be true over the years.

Other than the COVID situation, Manchester is a far wetter city than Southampton. Nevertheless, I would admit that conspiracy theories are always fun.
 
Former India limited overs’ great Yuvraj Singh has echoed Head Coach Ravi Shastri’s stand and stated that the World Test Championship (WTC) Final should be a best of three event. He added that India would be at a disadvantage as they would get into the mega clash without any match practice whereas New Zealand would have just gotten off a two-Test series in similar conditions against hosts England.

Yuvraj added that any number of net sessions or practice sessions were no substitute for real match-time and play.

“I feel in a situation like this, there should be a best of 3 Tests, because if you lose the first one then you can come back in the next two. India will have a slight disadvantage because New Zealand are already playing Test cricket in England. There are 8-10 practice sessions but there’s no substitute for match-practice. It will be an even contest but New Zealand will have an edge,” quoted Yuvraj.

Yuvraj also highlighted the importance of the Indian openers – Rohit Sharma and Shubman Gill – to get into their groove early for India to have success in the final against New Zealand and the five-Test series against England that starts in early August. He added that Rohit and Gill had both not opened in Test cricket in England and that could be a challenge against the Dukes Ball.

“Rohit Sharma is very experienced now in Test matches. He has almost 7 hundreds, 4 hundreds as opener. But both Rohit and Shubman Gill have not opened in England ever. They know the challenge, the Dukes Ball swings early. They have to get used to the conditions quickly. In England, it’s important to take it one session at a time. In the morning, the ball swings and seams, in the afternoon you can score runs, after Tea, it swings again. As a batsman, if you can adapt to these things, you can be successful,” stated Yuvraj.

Yuvraj added that Gill showed his class and temperament in Australia producing many match-defining knocks in tough situations and that should stand him in good stead in England.

“On the other hand, Shubman is a very young guy, still inexperienced but he should feel confident about his success in Australia. So, if he has the belief, he can do well anywhere else in the world.”

Yuvraj further stated that India had a great Test outfit capable of beating anyone anywhere in the world but given the conditions in England and the use of the Dukes ball New Zealand were his favourites although just marginally.

“I feel India is very strong, because lately they have been performing really well away from home. They have the belief that they can win anywhere. But conditions in England will be different, then there’s the Dukes cricket ball. The players do have quite some time to get used to the conditions, so I’m backing my team but playing the Test match straightaway won’t be easy for India, New Zealand will have an edge.”

Yuvraj said that India were definitely the stronger batting unit and both the teams were at par as far as bowling prowess was concerned. The only problem for India according to him was lack of match practice in the format and to switch from IPL mode to Test mode.

“I think our batting is stronger, bowling I’d say both teams are at par. But it will be a bit difficult for the Indian players to get into the Test mode straightaway in England because they played the IPL in between,” claimed Yuvraj.

https://www.news18.com/cricketnext/...best-of-three-tests-yuvraj-singh-3816374.html
 
The problem has never been swing per se. It's usually seam movement that kills us. However, NZ play swing the best and so even if the pitch is flat and the Dukes swings in the air , we will lose because NZ play swing better than us.

Not sure about that.

We have been pretty awful against swing since 2011.

Somehow we manage against seam which is most pronounced in SA.
 
New Zealand captain Kane Williamson speaks about the much-anticipated ICC World Test Championship final between his team and India.

Firstly, we are sitting here in Ageas Bowl, so I suppose it is a fitting place to ask you about the World Test Championship Final. What is it like to be here knowing that in a few weeks’ time you will be playing a final against India?

Yeah, the two Tests against England before the WTC final are important matches and ones the guys are looking forward to. But naturally, there is a carrot at the end that has taken a long time to, I suppose, to accumulate points and have the opportunity to be involved in it. To get that chance is exciting and the guys know it. You know it's sort of the third Test match of the mini-series I suppose, and they are really excited to be involved.

You were talking about Test Cricket as the pinnacle, as the first time to have a World Test Final. What would winning the World Test Championship mean to the New Zealand Cricket team?

Oh yeah, it is something new and different. They have looked to bring about more context to the Test format and I think we saw it at the end of the competition, teams trying to push their case for qualifying which made way for a lot of exciting results. We saw in Australia, in New Zealand, a lot of teams had a chance to get through. I thought it proved to be great adding that context and for us to see ourselves in the position we are in the finals now. It is exciting. We are looking forward to that when we are taking on the top-rank side in the world. We know how strong they are and the depth they have. So exciting to be playing against each other at a neutral venue.

Two test nations that have put a lot of emphasis on Test Cricket, do you think the World Test Championship format has helped ensure the longevity of Test cricket or you hope it does with the added context to help keep the relevance.

Yeah, that is obviously the idea behind the tournament structure of Test championship and added points and these sorts of things to entice and improve the brand of the game and I think when it came to the crunch time, you could see the equation of what they had to do to be involved in the final. You saw sides play that way which is what they are after. Hopefully, that has generated a lot of interest from the public and enjoyment of the Test game, which is obviously what cricketers are involved in. It is the pinnacle and I certainly enjoy playing it. It has added a good element to the Test format.

Your opposition captain Virat has always had a bit of chat about you and him. You’ve obviously played against each other in the u-19s and you have captained against each other many times. How much do you guys look forward to that conspicuous rivalry on the big stage?

Yeah, hard case. Over the years, we have played against each other in so many different levels and competitions and have known each other fairly well. So, it will be quite cool walking out there, doing the toss and having a bit of contact in the first Test Championship Final.

There was a question there around Brendon Mccullum and a lot of people charted the growth of the New Zealand cricket team from when they were not at the top of the table and contest from there. Can you reflect a bit on the journey of the team and perhaps Baz’s influence on those early days, how would that go?

Obviously, Baz and Mike Hesson took over and gave the team a strong direction that was huge in creating a much-improved environment. Nothing promises results but you know we did see a lot of areas of the game, the style with which we tried to play the game changed, and certainly changed for the better. He and Mike must take a lot of credit for that. Obviously, it was a while ago when the transition started but he is a fantastic leader and did an amazing job with our side.

You have been out here for the first time, looking at the ground can you assess what you might face come June 18 out here.

Mow it a bit, give it a roll maybe! I do not know the team yet, let us see what the conditions are. What we have seen so far is pretty much rain, every day. It is nice to be outside to be honest, just getting some experience facing the duke in different conditions.

What about the venue in general, looks spectacular and get a few fans in as well?

That is right. That is exciting, nice to have some fans. Yeah, fantastic ground, great venue and in my personal experience I have played a few games but no red ball games but an amazing atmosphere everywhere in this country.

I suppose given the 2020 pandemic, from both sides this is a bit of a celebration, a final, might be some fans here as well. Something to celebrate with people?

Every country is a bit different with their timelines and how they have dealt with different things. In a large country like England, you can see that the public is able to see the light at the end of the tunnel so to speak and I am sure they will be very enthusiastic to get to sporting events. So hopefully it brings a pretty cool atmosphere. And whenever you play India, there is a good atmosphere, and it is usually geared towards them, but it is pretty good fun.

What it has been like or what will it be like operating in the team environment with different protocols on team travel these days. How does that manifest itself with the team training and preparing for Test Cricket?

Yeah, I mean it is the bubble life, I guess. For some guys it is the first time, some have been before. I mean it is just the differences, rules, and governments. All have different ideas on things, sort of follow the protocols best you can and try to make sure you are as safe as you can be and so the events can go ahead.

Specific question here on the no.7 role, New Zealand have in the past at their home played around with, whether it is going with an all-rounder with pace or spin as well, how much is that a question mark or something you have to check with Steady about and consider around here as well?

Yeah, I guess we will have to assess conditions and make those decisions. That is obviously what we try and do every time, whenever we get to a different venue and work out what might suit us. Cards are on the table, I guess.

Quick comment on the Indian bowling attack you will face, obviously you have seen a bit of them when they came over to New Zealand two summers ago.

Yeah, they have got a fantastic attack. Brilliant, obviously a brilliant side. Throughout we have seen the depth they have as well, certainly saw that in Australia as well. A lot of strengths in their fast bowling and spin department. So yeah, a brilliant side, ranked right up the top, which is fair enough and an exciting opportunity for us to be involved in the final taking on the best.

You might be asked a couple of times, but the ICC Cricket World Cup 2019 final was over here which went down to the wire and the team got picked on the boundary count, does this have any relevance to this match do you think?

No, I do not think so, certainly not something that the guys have spoken about. I guess being a different side really with a different format as well. The focus is definitely on the transition from not playing much cricket or from where the guys who have played white ball cricket to just change into that Test format but hopefully there is still a great atmosphere for that game. The match you mentioned was a very memorable one and obviously it had some controversy and it had everything, and people loved watching it, at the end of the day. That is why people got a lot out of it. Hopefully, it is a great spectacle, and we get a decent crowd, and it is a really good game!

Last question, this one is about Neil Wagner, given the bowling attack performed so well with Boult, Southee and the addition of Jamieson, wanted to know the role of Wagner, the sort of role he is fitted into over the last two seasons and what you put his success down to?

Yeah, he has been a pivotal part of our team for a number of years and his role is unique and certainly different from the other bowlers. His ability to bowl long spells and keep applying pressure for long periods of time has been something that has made him so successful at the international level. He is a big member of our side and a big character in our team. It is always great to have him along.

ICC
 
If the pitch is dry, India has by far superior team

If pitch is green or match sees rain/cloud, NZ has the deadlier attack.

Most likely wkt will be typical true deck with some help on day 1 for seamers and by day 4 turn out of rough.

NZ will fancy their chances to land big knockout blow up front on day 1 and use day 2-3 to turn screw in. India will know that longer the game lasts the more their strengths will come into play (quality spinner, game changing 4th inns players like Kohli, Pant).

Hoping for a good even contest that goes into day 5

Rain predicted for the 19th, 20th and 21st... maybe the 22nd too. Looks tough for India.

Screen Shot 2021-06-07 at 12.17.57 AM.jpg

https://weather.com/weather/tenday/...96c3cca462d87bda777e944e518555e439fa103eff337
 
View attachment 109472

Only NZ play swing exceptionally well.

These random stats dont mean much. Plus its last 3 years.

We have been woeful in England since 2011.

2018 was decent but our batting was really bad.

We are poor against spin too yet we are invincible at home and our average against spin...would probably show impressive numbers.

We clearly have a weakness against the moving ball. If we put runs on the board, we will win in England.
 
Last edited:
Just to give a perspective of how vital Jadeja is to the Indian line up..

View attachment 109343

These are genuinely ATG level stats as an all rounder, even if only for a three year period. He is arguably the MVP in test cricket, especially when you consider his electric fielding as well.

I feel like some of you just look up stats on cricinfo and post without actually watching these guys play cricket. Jadeja looked terrible every single time he stepped onto a test match pitch in England. 18 innings, average of 30, just 2 scores of above 50 and he has consistently looked scratchy iwth the bat but hey, at least he can score a bit. The guy however becomes a joke with the ball. He simply darts them in and gets hit all over the ground.

Jadeja would be a joke selection in England.
 
Rain predicted for the 19th, 20th and 21st... maybe the 22nd too. Looks tough for India.

View attachment 109474

https://weather.com/weather/tenday/...96c3cca462d87bda777e944e518555e439fa103eff337

Chances are the forecast could change but if it does stay like this, then it would be tough for India to bat in such conditions against, hopefully a fit group of Southee, Jamieson and Boult.

Having said that, if it rains heavy and time is taken from the game, it could be a draw...which is a poor method of deciding who wins a trophy.
 
Chances are the forecast could change but if it does stay like this, then it would be tough for India to bat in such conditions against, hopefully a fit group of Southee, Jamieson and Boult.

Having said that, if it rains heavy and time is taken from the game, it could be a draw...which is a poor method of deciding who wins a trophy.

Game will be washed out, wonder which genius decided to have this match played in Eng during this time period. What a waste.
 
Game will be washed out, wonder which genius decided to have this match played in Eng during this time period. What a waste.

Well, June-August are peak summer months and the rain is very hard to predict here. It may have been better in July/August but again, no guarantee in England. It would have made more sense to have the matches in August maybe with the Indian tour starting in June...was there even a need for a NZ tour so early?

Money money money my friend.
 
These random stats dont mean much. Plus its last 3 years.

We have been woeful in England since 2011.

2018 was decent but our batting was really bad.

We are poor against spin too yet we are invincible at home and our average against spin...would probably show impressive numbers.

We clearly have a weakness against the moving ball. If we put runs on the board, we will win in England.

I've seen similar data that shows us to be decent players of swing even before this. There are two factors at play here. The pitches have been seaming a lot more but also the English bowlers(specifically Broad and Anderson) have been accurate and have better laid plans for our batsmen than we have had for them .

English bowlers in english conditions have ruthlessly destroyed batsmen by relentlessly targeting their weaknesses. Check what happened to Warner 2 years ago.

Swing is not the major culprit .
 
Virat Kohli steps up on big occasions: Brett Lee lists reasons why winning WTC final 'means a lot' to India captain

On being asked how much would winning the trophy would mean to Virat Kohli, former Australia pacer Brett Lee said that the India captain would be eager to perform in the big match.


If there has one criticism that has been held up against Virat Kohli's captaincy reign over the years, it is his inability to win an ICC tournament so far. Before Kohli, under MS Dhoni, India had won three ICC titles in six years -- the 2007 T20I World Cup, the 2011 ODI World Cup, and the 2013 Champions Trophy. But since Kohli took over the captaincy in 2017, India are yet to win a major ICC trophy.

The Kohli-led Indian team lost the Champions Trophy final in 2017 and then went on to finish as the semifinalists in the 2019 ODI World Cup, losing to New Zealand.

Now, Kohli has a chance to win his first ICC trophy - the inaugural World Test Championship trophy, as India face Kane Williamson's New Zealand. On being asked how much would winning the trophy would mean to Virat Kohli, former Australia pacer Brett Lee said that the India captain would be eager to perform in the big match.

"Both captains (Virat Kohli and Kane Williamson) would want to raise a trophy at the end. In terms of the Indian skipper, Kohli, he is such a dynamic player, such a great influencer for the team, world-class batter," Brett Lee said in an ICC press release.

https://www.hindustantimes.com/cricket/virat-kohli-steps-up-on-big-occasions-brett-lee-lists-explains-why-winning-wtc-final-means-a-lot-to-india-captain-101623052526604.html
 
I feel like some of you just look up stats on cricinfo and post without actually watching these guys play cricket. Jadeja looked terrible every single time he stepped onto a test match pitch in England. 18 innings, average of 30, just 2 scores of above 50 and he has consistently looked scratchy iwth the bat but hey, at least he can score a bit. The guy however becomes a joke with the ball. He simply darts them in and gets hit all over the ground.

Jadeja would be a joke selection in England.

Criticise people for using statsguru instead of actually watching the game, then promptly proceed to list out stats from statsguru in the very next sentence.

If you were following the cricket, you would know that Jadeja has taken his batting to the next level in the last 2-3 years and he is likely to contribute more with the bat than Vihari who is our no.6 batsman. And I'm not even going into his bowling and fielding contribution.
 
Criticise people for using statsguru instead of actually watching the game, then promptly proceed to list out stats from statsguru in the very next sentence.

If you were following the cricket, you would know that Jadeja has taken his batting to the next level in the last 2-3 years and he is likely to contribute more with the bat than Vihari who is our no.6 batsman. And I'm not even going into his bowling and fielding contribution.

But why do you feel the need to pick an all rounder as a specialist batsman? He is picked for his allround ability and his bowling is trash in England, on top of all that, he can bat however he wants in the last 2-3 years but that doesn't mean he will all of a sudden be averaging 40+ in England against one of the best test bowling attacks around. That is a ridiculous selection and I repeat, please watch cricket.
 
But why do you feel the need to pick an all rounder as a specialist batsman? He is picked for his allround ability and his bowling is trash in England, on top of all that, he can bat however he wants in the last 2-3 years but that doesn't mean he will all of a sudden be averaging 40+ in England against one of the best test bowling attacks around. That is a ridiculous selection and I repeat, please watch cricket.

I am quite sure that he will average 40+ in England this time. Secondly, it's you who need to watch more of Jadeja. He already averages 31 in England, what makes you think he can't average 40 on this tour?
His batting has improved a lot.
 
But why do you feel the need to pick an all rounder as a specialist batsman? He is picked for his allround ability and his bowling is trash in England, on top of all that, he can bat however he wants in the last 2-3 years but that doesn't mean he will all of a sudden be averaging 40+ in England against one of the best test bowling attacks around. That is a ridiculous selection and I repeat, please watch cricket.

Boxing day test 2020. A juicy wicket with decent grass cover. Australia hurt after getting bowled out for a low total, start bowling like demons at the start of the 2nd day. Cummins, Hazelwood and Starc hooping it around both ways with pace.

Jadeja batted patiently and laid a solid foundation with his skipper, helping India to safety by stumps, thereby getting India a decent lead. If you had actually watched some games, you would realise Jadeja has improved his batting very much and not just flat track bullying against minnows at home.

I'm asking Jadeja to be picked at no.6 because he is likely to more score runs than his direct competitor for that position - Vihari, who has been in terrible nick with the bat even in his County stint so much so that Warwickshire dropped him after 2 games. You're talking as if averaging 30 with the bat at no.7 and 8 in England is a shameful record. Then again, you probably know better than the rest of us.
 
As much as the match itself, I am just as interested in what role the ICC has played in this whole WTC.

I mean, this is supposed to be an ICC "tournament". But the ICC couldn't be more disinterested if they tried.
 
I feel like some of you just look up stats on cricinfo and post without actually watching these guys play cricket. Jadeja looked terrible every single time he stepped onto a test match pitch in England. 18 innings, average of 30, just 2 scores of above 50 and he has consistently looked scratchy iwth the bat but hey, at least he can score a bit. The guy however becomes a joke with the ball. He simply darts them in and gets hit all over the ground.

Jadeja would be a joke selection in England.

Jadeja is the MVP of the Indian test team right now. Would walk into any test team in the world. Outperformed both Ashwin and Lyon with the ball in last 3 BG series, not to mention his superior batting and fielding. It's ridiculous to question his place in the team.
 
^Jadeja's career batting average is better than World No1 Williamson's in 4 countries: England, Australia, India and SriLanka!!!! :ishant
[MENTION=154259]mastimasti[/MENTION] Why do NZ keep playing Kane I wonder? He can't even bowl or field anywhere close to Jadeja. :rp
 
Umpires for World Test Championship final:

On field - Richard Illingworth and Michael Gough.

3rd Umpire - Richard Kettleborough.
 
^Jadeja's career batting average is better than World No1 Williamson's in 4 countries: England, Australia, India and SriLanka!!!! :ishant

[MENTION=154259]mastimasti[/MENTION] Why do NZ keep playing Kane I wonder? He can't even bowl or field anywhere close to Jadeja. :rp

Kane will atleast negate ashwin and jadeja. Conway and co will handle the indian seamers
 
Chances are the forecast could change but if it does stay like this, then it would be tough for India to bat in such conditions against, hopefully a fit group of Southee, Jamieson and Boult.

Having said that, if it rains heavy and time is taken from the game, it could be a draw...which is a poor method of deciding who wins a trophy.

Unfortunately for India, the forecast doesn't change very much ten days out. Here is the latest forecast that also covers June 22nd.

Screen Shot 2021-06-08 at 5.33.38 AM.jpg

A draw may happen due to the rain, though I think it would be tough for Indian batsmen to survive long in these conditions. There is also a reserve day to make up for time lost due to rain. Indian batsmen will have to show they can bat in English conditions, which I think is a fair requirement for them if they want to be World Champions.
 
WTC Final | Conway and Southee set alarm bells ringing in Indian camp, Kohli and Co search for answers

The much-awaited WTC final, scheduled to be played from June 18 at the Ageas Bowl, will be a repeat of the 2019 World Cup semi-final where New Zealand had registered an 18-run win

In a monotonous third session when England needed 140 odd runs off the last 20 overs, the hosts chose to play it safe as they recorded a draw against New Zealand on the final day of the first Test at Lord's. Chasing 273 in the rain-marred clash, Dom Sibley dropped anchor, scoring unbeaten 60 from 207 deliveries as they battled for a draw instead of risking a chase.

Earlier in the day, Kiwi spearhead Kane Williamson declared on 169/6, rekindling hopes of thousands of fans at the 'home of cricket' who were in fear of witnessing a mundane contest between two world-class sides. A cautious approach and early blows pegged England back as skipper Joe Root decided to not show any sort of appetite to attack. A lowly scorecard was the end result as both sides shook hands after over six hours of English batsmen safeguarding their innings.

WTC Final: New Zealand face challenge against India in peak form, says Ish Sodhi

On the return of spectators to Test cricket in England, there emerged some heroes too. It started with Devon Conway scoring a magnificent double century before Tim Southee took charge. The Kiwi paceman led New Zealand’s attack with 6-43, place on the Lord’s honors board after his 10-wicket haul in 2013.

Neil Wagner and Kyle Jamieson looked impressive too as the Kiwis tightened the noose on English batsmen. With Trent Boult ready to join the bowling set-up, the BlackCaps bowling attack looks better than ever, especially when the inaugural World Test Championship (WTC) final is just days away.

The WTC final, scheduled to be played from June 18 at the Ageas Bowl, will be a repeat of the 2019 World Cup semi-final where New Zealand had registered an 18-run win in a rain-marred encounter. While the New Zealand pace attack looks a formidable one, the Indian batting guns, led by skipper Virat Kohli himself, will put themselves on the line in Southampton. However, Kohli and Co. need to address a few issues too.

Pujara's dry patch

Cheteshwar Pujara has been a rock-solid pillar of India's Test setup. In 85 Tests, Pujara has scored 6244 runs at an average of 46.59 with 18 centuries and 29 half-centuries under his belt. Known for his defensive abilities and resilience, the No.3 batsman's numbers indicate the impact he has had in the traditional format.

But the flow of runs seems to have tapered off, especially since the start of the World Test Championship (WTC) cycle. The Saurashtra batsman has scored just 818 runs in 17 Tests since August 2019 at a poor average of 29.21.

Pujara averages just 29.41 with 500 runs from 9 Tests in England and India would want him to improve the record in the four-month long gruelling tour.

Gill or Mayank?

Rohit Sharma has played only one Test in England in the past but it's his experience and batting ability that make him India's first-choice opener for the WTC Final. While Rohit has secured the opening position in the Test set-up, the team management is searching for a stable option at the top. Shubman Gill and Mayank Agarwal.

Agarwal was sidelined from the Test combination after two failures against Australia. Gill, his replacement, shone Down Under but floundered in the subsequent Test series against England at home. Gill was also poor in the recently-postponed IPL, raising questions over his inclusion for the summit clash against New Zealand.

Gill would make the cut if the team management trusts the youngster to play a Gabba-like innings in Southampton. Technically sound Agarwal, on the other hand, can be roped in if the Indian team wants a disciplined opener in English conditions.

Kohli's ton drought

Indian spearhead Virat Kohli also has to lay the ghost of 'century drought' to rest. Kohli, arguably among the best modern-day batsmen, has not got hold of an international ton since November 2019 -- the longest he has gone without scoring the three-figure mark.

The prolific batter may have got 70 international hundreds under his belt, but a lean patch featuring not a single 100 has got people talking, especially when India hasn't got hold of an ICC trophy under his leadership.

Surprisingly, Kohli's last ODI hundred was against West Indies back in August 2019. Kohli, who will be touring England for the third time in his illustrious career, has stopped looking at series as 'ultimate goals'.

"If in 2014, you would have told me that in 2021 I'm going to play the WTC final, I would have had a tough time believing that. I have stopped looking at series as ultimate tasks or goals. It's about leading the team in the right way," Kohli had said in a presser before the team's departure for England.

"I don't think the mindset has changed at all. The mindset was always to go out there and perform. I only see it (the previous tours) as an evolution of my position in the team."

Rahane's battle with consistency

Ajinkya Rahane might be India's leading run-scorer in the ongoing cycle of the World Test Championship, but he's been struggling fo find consistency. After a splendid ton against Australia in Melbourne earlier this year, the Mumbaikar has registered four single-digit scores.

Rahane, who led India to glory in the Border-Gavaskar trophy, has managed to score just 380 runs in the last eight Test -- a record that doesn't justify his batting prowess.

Former India chief selector MSK Prasad also believes Rahane can rise to the occasion when it matters the most. A series win Down Under and performance against Australia will help the Indian vice-captain in getting the mojo back.

He is a wonderful team-man and everybody likes him a lot. Whenever Virat hasn’t played a big inning, this man has stepped up. We must not forget how he delivered as a captain and a player in Australia when many seniors were absent," Prasad said in an interview with cricket.com.

Bumrah, Shami in English conditions

Jasprit Bumrah has played only nine Tests for India so far in the World Test Championship but has managed to pluck an impressive 34 wickets. Bumrah played only three Tests against Australia in the Border-Gavaskar Trophy 2020-21 where he scalped 11 wickets before missing the final Test due to injury.

Against England, he played two Tests and returned with four wickets before taking a break for his wedding. The Mumbai Indians bowler will be crucial to India's chances against New Zealand, especially in English conditions.

Bumrah is just into his third year in Test cricket and will eye success in England. Ishant Sharma, Mohammed Shami, and Umesh Yadav will also team up with Bumrah as the Indian pace force looks arguably the best at present.

Seasoned pacer Shami also has a point to prove. He has played 8 Tests in England so far, 3 in 2014 and 5 in 2018. The pacer picked up 16 wickets in five Tests in 2018 but his first England tour was mediocre. He managed to pluck only 5 wickets at an average of 73.

https://www.indiatvnews.com/sports/cricket/wtc-final-devon-conway-tim-southee-set-alarm-bells-ringing-in-indian-camp-virat-kohli-and-co-search-for-answers-710178
 
Besides Rohit, our batting is in dire form, with Rahane skating on thinnest possible ice. Don't know how we'll cope up with Southee, Boult & Jamieson!
 
Besides Rohit, our batting is in dire form, with Rahane skating on thinnest possible ice. Don't know how we'll cope up with Southee, Boult & Jamieson!

Shastri and Kohli have to be ruthless in the selections if India has to have any chance and discard the old guard as needed.

Discard Rahane and Shami if necessary, don't just keep them in the team because of respect for seniority. Bring in young players like Siraj and Thakur who won us the Australian series.

India has repeatedly failed in conditions that will be there in Southampton. Need some radical thinking to stand a chance.
 
Shastri and Kohli have to be ruthless in the selections if India has to have any chance and discard the old guard as needed.

Discard Rahane and Shami if necessary, don't just keep them in the team because of respect for seniority. Bring in young players like Siraj and Thakur who won us the Australian series.

India has repeatedly failed in conditions that will be there in Southampton. Need some radical thinking to stand a chance.
Rahane is not going to get dropped!

Seniority culture is alive and kicking in our team despite claims to the contrary.
 
Unfortunately for India, the forecast doesn't change very much ten days out. Here is the latest forecast that also covers June 22nd.

Eh? Forecasts are ridiculously unreliable 10+ days out hence why this forecast is completely different to what some other sources are currently showing.
 
Concerning that India haven't had a hit out together till today.
 
Eh? Forecasts are ridiculously unreliable 10+ days out hence why this forecast is completely different to what some other sources are currently showing.

I have posted the forecast and it will be here when the game is played. You can then check whether it was "ridiculously unreliable".
 
Rahane is not going to get dropped!

Seniority culture is alive and kicking in our team despite claims to the contrary.


Agree. But to be fair we have no other option than to play Rahane. Vihari has been dreadful in county cricket this season. Only alternative is to open with Rahul/Mayank and push Rohit into the MO but I don't really see that happening.
 
India has more than enough experience to bowl NZ twice.

Despite Indian fans concern over Indian batters' form, I think they will provide enough runs to secure a Win.

I got a feeling that slip catches will decide a low scoring scoring thriller.
 
India has more than enough experience to bowl NZ twice.

Despite Indian fans concern over Indian batters' form, I think they will provide enough runs to secure a Win.

I got a feeling that slip catches will decide a low scoring scoring thriller.

Kohli should avoid slip fielding.
 
Agree. But to be fair we have no other option than to play Rahane. Vihari has been dreadful in county cricket this season. Only alternative is to open with Rahul/Mayank and push Rohit into the MO but I don't really see that happening.
Vihari was never an option to begin with, don't know why we even bothered with him.

Blame for us not to have Rahane's replacement ready also lies at team management's doors. I mean its not that Rahane is failing only from past few tests. He has been a failure (averages 36 during last 5 years) for quite a few years now and considering the abundance of resources we have at our disposal, we should've been adequately prepared for that.

Next in line is Pujara who averages 36 during a good enough sample size of 4 years.
 
Vihari was never an option to begin with, don't know why we even bothered with him.

Blame for us not to have Rahane's replacement ready also lies at team management's doors. I mean its not that Rahane is failing only from past few tests. He has been a failure (averages 36 during last 5 years) for quite a few years now and considering the abundance of resources we have at our disposal, we should've been adequately prepared for that.

Next in line is Pujara who averages 36 during a good enough sample size of 4 years.

We should give a chance to KL Rahul in tests. He will do better at 5, he is selected also as middle order batsman in tests.
 
We should give a chance to KL Rahul in tests. He will do better at 5, he is selected also as middle order batsman in tests.
Rahul has flattered to deceive too many times. Don't think we should go with him. However considering team management's love affair with him, I think he too will be tried at some stage.
 
Am I the only one that thinks this series is gonna be akin to the Eng tour of 2011, after the 4-0, Rahul, VVS and a few others had to give way for youngsters, this could be it for Rohit, Rahane and Pujara if they dont do well.
 
Away from home, this is our best team:-

Gill
Vihari
Pujara
Kohli(c)
KL
Pant(wkt)
Jadeja
Ashwin
Siraj
Ishant
Bumrah
 
Away from home, this is our best team:-

Gill
Vihari
Pujara
Kohli(c)
KL
Pant(wkt)
Jadeja
Ashwin
Siraj
Ishant
Bumrah

agrawal over vihari.

I dont think kl rahul will make the test team. rahane is much better. why doesnt india try shreyas iyer ?
 
Away from home, this is our best team:-

Gill
Vihari
Pujara
Kohli(c)
KL
Pant(wkt)
Jadeja
Ashwin
Siraj
Ishant
Bumrah


Rahane may not have performed to the best of his abilities in the past few years but he's still a better candidate for no.5 than Rahul on any given day. And Vihari is way too limited to add anything to the team. At best he's a replacement for Pujara at no3.
 
Away from home, this is our best team:-

Gill
Vihari
Pujara
Kohli(c)
KL
Pant(wkt)
Jadeja
Ashwin
Siraj
Ishant
Bumrah

Rohit has to play. You don't drop your 2nd best all format batsman unless you have a Gavaskar waiting and Vihari isn't even close.

Also reputation matters. Opposition will worry more about Rohit than they ever will about Vihari.
 
I've seen similar data that shows us to be decent players of swing even before this. There are two factors at play here. The pitches have been seaming a lot more but also the English bowlers(specifically Broad and Anderson) have been accurate and have better laid plans for our batsmen than we have had for them .

English bowlers in english conditions have ruthlessly destroyed batsmen by relentlessly targeting their weaknesses. Check what happened to Warner 2 years ago.

Swing is not the major culprit .

Seam might play a role but upon watching with the naked eye, swing is clearly the killer.

Heck, one Anderson reverse spell swings test matches even in India.

We don't get destroyed in SA even tho the pacers there are arguably superior. Logically, we should get bundled out there like nobody's business but we don't.

We don't cover the line for swing and more often than not, its our undoing.

Maybe we can't play seam at all when it swings.....but looks to me, whenever there is swing, we struggle.
 
We generally struggle badly whenever there's seam movement or swing available.

No point discussing which one we suck more at playing.
 
New Zealand playing 3 Tests in short gap can be an issue: Mike Hesson

Hesson, who coached New Zealand from 2012-2018, also backed Rishabh Pant to provide the x-factor like he did on the memorable tour of Australia earlier this year and is in favour of a best of three WTC final in the long run.

New Zealand’s two Tests against England before the World Test Championship final against India could end up creating workload management issues for the Black Caps, feels the Kiwis longest-serving coach Mike Hesson.

In an interview to PTI, Hesson also had some advice for the Indian team: Go with Mayank Agarwal in the opening slot instead of retaining the set combination of Rohit Sharma and Shubman Gill.

COVID-19 related restrictions have left India with limited preparation time ahead of the final beginning June 18 while New Zealand will have the advantage of playing two games against England before the first ever WTC title clash in Southampton. Hesson doesn’t agree with that assessment.

“It is an issue (playing three Tests with a four day gap in between). New Zealand will have to look at the bowling attack and that’s potentially why Trent Boult will play this game (second Test against England from Thursday,” he pointed out.

“That will give one of those other quicks to rest potentially, because it’s only four days between each Test. So, three on the bounce is a big deal, especially if you put in 45 to 50 overs in the second Test, or they just decide to manage the workloads which is not something you usually do going into a Test match,” he said.

The 46-year-old, who coached New Zealand from 2012-2018, also backed Rishabh Pant to provide the x-factor like he did on the memorable tour of Australia earlier this year and is in favour of a best of three WTC final in the long run.

One of New Zealand’s most successful coaches who is now currently director of cricket at the Royal Challengers Bangalore, Hesson expects Rohit and Gill to open but wants Agarwal, who lost his spot in the eleven after two Tests in Australia, to be given a chance.

Agarwal was the team’s leading run getter in the away series against New Zealand last year when India lost 0-2 and was only one of the four Indian batsmen to get a half-century in an otherwise difficult campaign.

“They will probably go with Rohit and Shubman but I think Mayank needs to be considered. He has faced the New Zealand attack in New Zealand, where he would have got some crucial experience,” said Hesson.

On India’s preparation going into the final compared to New Zealand, he said: “Look match practice is always useful. You know every ground is different though.

“Southampton is quite unique in terms of its ground so sure match practice is helpful.

“But India have got a big enough squad to where they can have intra squad games to get some training done out in the middle so I think come the first day of the final, I don’t think it will be a big deal.”

“How both top orders deal with the moving ball will be key. The Dukes ball will swing and it will seam a little bit for a period of time. And I think if the top orders are able to blunt that out from either side then they’ll get a distinct advantage,” he said.

“…it will be a fair cricket wicket and the ball will offer something for everybody. The spinners always like the Dukes, because it’s got that high seam, there will be cross breeze so it will swing a little bit.

“And with the Dukes, there will be a little bit of seam on offer at least for the first 10 overs with, with each new ball so every batsman will be will be challenged,” he explained.

Hesson thinks the Indian fast bowlers, including the reserves, will provide good preparation to their batsmen against the moving ball.

With the spinners expected to come into play later in the game, Hesson said R Ashwin and Ravindra Jadeja must play alongside three pacers.

For New Zealand, he sees four pacers in the side alongside Colin de Grandhomme or Mitchell Santer.

“That (Ashwin and Jadeja) gives India a really good balance. It gives you five frontline bowlers which means you can attack both left and right-handers and New Zealand have got five left-handers and six- right handers…”

Hesson expects Pant to bat at six and do what he did in Australia.

“I think he’s more confident, more settled on the international stage now. Therefore, he’s able to play the way he wants to play. He has earned enough credit within his team as well.

“He also does the hard work first, so it’s not a reckless play. He allows himself that chance to show a bit of flair, which we all enjoy watching.”

Talking about the Black Caps’ performance in the drawn first Test against England, Hesson wasn’t surprised to see South Africa-born Devon Conway play the way he did en route to a double century on debut.

He was also impressed with the timing of Williamson’s declaration on day five to force a result, something New Zealand “might have not done in the past”.

“No surprises there at all. We were just waiting for him (Conway) to qualify (to play for NZ) and since he got introduced in the white ball format, he was always going to play (Tests).

“It was tough on Tom Blundell, having started so well at the top of the order but Conway is too good a player to leave out.”

Hesson concluded by supporting India head coach Ravi Shastri’s views on the WTC final format going forward.

“If it is to be considered a pinnacle event then time needs to be made in cricket calendar for a best of three final.”


https://indianexpress.com/article/sports/cricket/indvnz-wtc-final-nz-playing-3-tests-in-short-gap-can-be-an-issue-india-should-consider-agarwal-as-opener-mike-hesson-7350917/
 
ew Zealand’s two Tests against England before the World Test Championship final against India could end up creating workload management issues for the Black Caps, feels the Kiwis longest-serving coach Mike Hesson.In an interview to PTI, Hesson also had some advice for the Indian team: Go with Mayank Agarwal in the opening slot instead of retaining the set combination of Rohit Sharma and Shubman Gill.

COVID-19 related restrictions have left India with limited preparation time ahead of the final beginning June 18 while New Zealand will have the advantage of playing two games against England before the first ever WTC title clash in Southampton. Hesson doesn’t agree with that assessment.

“It is an issue (playing three Tests with a four day gap in between). New Zealand will have to look at the bowling attack and that’s potentially why Trent Boult will play this game (second Test against England from Thursday,” he pointed out.

“That will give one of those other quicks to rest potentially, because it’s only four days between each Test. So, three on the bounce is a big deal, especially if you put in 45 to 50 overs in the second Test, or they just decide to manage the workloads which is not something you usually do going into a Test match,” he said.

The 46-year-old, who coached New Zealand from 2012-2018, also backed Rishabh Pant to provide the x-factor like he did on the memorable tour of Australia earlier this year and is in favour of a best of three WTC final in the long run.

One of New Zealand’s most successful coaches who is now currently director of cricket at the Royal Challengers Bangalore, Hesson expects Rohit and Gill to open but wants Agarwal, who lost his spot in the eleven after two Tests in Australia, to be given a chance.

Agarwal was the team’s leading run getter in the away series against New Zealand last year when India lost 0-2 and was only one of the four Indian batsmen to get a half-century in an otherwise difficult campaign.

“They will probably go with Rohit and Shubman but I think Mayank needs to be considered. He has faced the New Zealand attack in New Zealand, where he would have got some crucial experience,” said Hesson.

On India’s preparation going into the final compared to New Zealand, he said: “Look match practice is always useful. You know every ground is different though.

“Southampton is quite unique in terms of its ground so sure match practice is helpful.

“But India have got a big enough squad to where they can have intra squad games to get some training done out in the middle so I think come the first day of the final, I don’t think it will be a big deal.”

While most experts see the match going New Zealand’s way if the ball is moving at the Aegeas Bowl but Hesson predicted an even contest.

“How both top orders deal with the moving ball will be key. The Dukes ball will swing and it will seam a little bit for a period of time. And I think if the top orders are able to blunt that out from either side then they’ll get a distinct advantage,” he said.

“…it will be a fair cricket wicket and the ball will offer something for everybody. The spinners always like the Dukes, because it’s got that high seam, there will be cross breeze so it will swing a little bit.

“And with the Dukes, there will be a little bit of seam on offer at least for the first 10 overs with, with each new ball so every batsman will be will be challenged,” he explained.

Hesson thinks the Indian fast bowlers, including the reserves, will provide good preparation to their batsmen against the moving ball.

With the spinners expected to come into play later in the game, Hesson said R Ashwin and Ravindra Jadeja must play alongside three pacers.

For New Zealand, he sees four pacers in the side alongside Colin de Grandhomme or Mitchell Santer.

“That (Ashwin and Jadeja) gives India a really good balance. It gives you five frontline bowlers which means you can attack both left and right-handers and New Zealand have got five left-handers and six- right handers…”

Hesson expects Pant to bat at six and do what he did in Australia.

“I think he’s more confident, more settled on the international stage now. Therefore, he’s able to play the way he wants to play. He has earned enough credit within his team as well.

“He also does the hard work first, so it’s not a reckless play. He allows himself that chance to show a bit of flair, which we all enjoy watching.”

Talking about the Black Caps’ performance in the drawn first Test against England, Hesson wasn’t surprised to see South Africa-born Devon Conway play the way he did en route to a double century on debut.

He was also impressed with the timing of Williamson’s declaration on day five to force a result, something New Zealand “might have not done in the past”.

“No surprises there at all. We were just waiting for him (Conway) to qualify (to play for NZ) and since he got introduced in the white ball format, he was always going to play (Tests).

“It was tough on Tom Blundell, having started so well at the top of the order but Conway is too good a player to leave out.”

Hesson concluded by supporting India head coach Ravi Shastri’s views on the WTC final format going forward.

https://www.news18.com/cricketnext/...-coach-ravi-shastri-on-same-page-3827192.html
 
If NZ hold onto their catches then they have a very good chance. There are players who give catching practice to opposition fielders and punish them for dropping their catches multiple times. :inti
 
If NZ want to win then they have to stop currently best wicketkeeper Batsman in the world .just simple formula for NZ:yk
 
I feel like some of you just look up stats on cricinfo and post without actually watching these guys play cricket. Jadeja looked terrible every single time he stepped onto a test match pitch in England. 18 innings, average of 30, just 2 scores of above 50 and he has consistently looked scratchy iwth the bat but hey, at least he can score a bit. The guy however becomes a joke with the ball. He simply darts them in and gets hit all over the ground.

Jadeja would be a joke selection in England.

Jadeja is still better than that once in a lifetime player Hardik Pandya. It is safe to say now that Jadeja has almost pushed Hardik Pandya out of test side even in SENA. He has improved his batting a lot. You have to actually watch it first before calling him a joke selection in England. :inti
 
Jadeja is still better than that once in a lifetime player Hardik Pandya. It is safe to say now that Jadeja has almost pushed Hardik Pandya out of test side even in SENA. He has improved his batting a lot. You have to actually watch it first before calling him a joke selection in England. :inti

Agreed. In test side, Jadeja is basically our MVP like Stokes is England's MVP.
 
Don't think the Indian batsmen will enjoy watching Boult and Henry swinging it around corners with a 60-over old ball
 
This looks like the 2018 batch of Dukes that were swinging for the full 80 overs.

Definitely need to pick Ishant in the XI. Read reports that Siraj is in the reckoning to be picked, which is a good move imo. But if it's at the cost of Ishant, then it's one of those typical brainless moves from the management. Siraj, Ishant and Bumrah should be the quicks. Pace, seam and swing all available in that trio.
 
This looks like the 2018 batch of Dukes that were swinging for the full 80 overs.

Definitely need to pick Ishant in the XI. Read reports that Siraj is in the reckoning to be picked, which is a good move imo. But if it's at the cost of Ishant, then it's one of those typical brainless moves from the management. Siraj, Ishant and Bumrah should be the quicks. Pace, seam and swing all available in that trio.

If the pitch is flat then Shami is a must.
 
If the pitch is flat then Shami is a must.

The current wicket isn't all that great either. But the overhead conditions will make the ball move in the air regardless of the pitch. More so if the Duke ball is going to be something like what we got in the last tour of England.
 
Don't think the Indian batsmen will enjoy watching Boult and Henry swinging it around corners with a 60-over old ball

Henry won't play.

Trent Boult
Tim Southee
Kyle Jamieson
Ajaz Patel
Colin de grandhomme

de grandhomme to bat at 7 and Jamieson at 8.
 
Henry won't play.

Trent Boult
Tim Southee
Kyle Jamieson
Ajaz Patel
Colin de grandhomme

de grandhomme to bat at 7 and Jamieson at 8.

I just meant to say NZ bowlers in general swinging it around corners with an old ball. Henry happened to be one of the bowlers doing it when I posted, but I’m sure Southee/Jamieson/CDG will achieve the same.

The Indian batsmen will have to play out of their skin to blunt that attack.
 
Looking at current weather there is highly chance of overcast condition with Max temperature around 18-19 . then surly I'll go with 4 fast bowler .
Gill
Rohit
Pujara
Virat
Rahane
Pant
Ashwin
Siraj
Ishant
Shami
Bumrah
Just go for gill with 4 fast bowler + Ash
 
Looking at current weather there is highly chance of overcast condition with Max temperature around 18-19 . then surly I'll go with 4 fast bowler .
Gill
Rohit
Pujara
Virat
Rahane
Pant
Ashwin
Siraj
Ishant
Shami
Bumrah
Just go for gill with 4 fast bowler + Ash

Very weak tail.

If you're going to pick 4 quicks, Thakur should be one of them so that not all 4 are no 11s. Also I would rather pick Jadeja over Ashwin if the wicket is green and not at all supportive to spin bowling. Either way, you aren't going to get many wickets from a spinner on a green wicket, but at least Jaddu will score more runs and field better.

My 11 on a green wicket:

Gill
Rohit
Pujara
Kohli (c)
Rahane
Pant (wk)
Jadeja
Thakur
Ishant
Siraj
Bumrah
 
No way Thakur the trundler will play especially when we have our fully fit pace attack available for selection.

Also, Ashwin and Jadeja will both play in XI.
 
No way Thakur the trundler will play especially when we have our fully fit pace attack available for selection.

Also, Ashwin and Jadeja will both play in XI.

Pick Thakur only in a 4 seamer option. He's not going to get picked in a 3 seamer team.

If you pick Shami, Siraj, Ishant and Bumrah in the same team, then the last 4 would contribute a grand total of 4 runs together.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top