Mamoon
ATG
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2012
- Runs
- 104,963
- Post of the Week
- 12
You’re exposing your ignorance again.Arteta for sainthood because he took an 8th place Arsenal into top 4 within a few years, yet Emrey takes relegation fighters Villa from 16th position mid 22/23 season and now has Villa in the top 4, within 1.5 years - yet Emrey spending £70M is the inept coach according to you, while Arteta who squanders nearly £650M, is the second coming of Jesus incarnated as Pep.
It is much easier to improve things quickly when you are managing a nothing club like Aston Villa, nothing in comparison to Arsenal.
The expectations are not the same. A failure of a season from Arsenal’s perspective would be a successful season from Aston Villa’s perspective.
Going from 16th to 4th with a club like Villa is a lot easier than going from 8th to 2nd with Arsenal because the level of competition and the level of pressure is not the same.
Spending £70m in the bottom half will have a much bigger impact than spending upwards of £500m when you are financially competing with City, United, Chelsea, Liverpool to win the title.
What you spend in isolation means nothing because it is all relative, relative to what your competitors are spending.
Arteta spent less money than Chelsea, United and even City who already had a champion team when he took over Arsenal, and yet he has closed the gap on City massively and surpassed Chelsea and United which showcases his brilliance.
Come back when Emery gets picked up a big club again and does well. He doesn’t merit a comparison with Arteta while he is still operating at a middling a club and got booted out from the same club that Arteta has achieved great progression with.