Mamoon
ATG
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2012
- Runs
- 104,960
- Post of the Week
- 12
“Odegaard is not world class”
“Odegaard has weak mentality”
“Smith-Rowe is superior”
“Maddison is better”
@Amjid Javed @topspin 0% ball knowledge.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
They are the same, you are just describing the status quo when Arteta took over. You can do it in 1 sentence, not need for 2 paragraphs.They are not the same. Taking over Arsenal when they were struggling to stay in the top half of the table would have been less challenging if Pep's City did not exist. Arteta not only had to face the challenge of rebuilding Arsenal but he also had to face the challenge of overcoming Pep's Man City.
This is a guy that doesn't live in UK, yet he magically watched football in late 80s and 90s.They are the same, you are just describing the status quo when Arteta took over. You can do it in 1 sentence, not need for 2 paragraphs.
I think it is his way of desperately wanting to be accepted by born and bred Brits through exaggeration.This is a guy that doesn't live in UK, yet he magically watched football in late 80s and 90s.
Supposedly Liverpool and United dominating those eras and Arsenal competing against them was no a big achievement.
This is modern day fans for you who think the history of football was non-existent and poor quality.
If Arsenal took City to last game of season in that fashion, no I wudnt call it a bottle job. I would look at where Arsenal essentially fell short, which would be the December where that poor month ultimately cost them, as well as the unnecessary tinkering in villa game this month as well.hypothetically speaking @Amjid Javed and i know football does not work on ifs and buts.
If Arsenal won all their games from now until the end of the Season and so did City which would win them the title.
Would you still consider Arsenal/Arteta bottle jobs?
Just to add in regards to missing out on titles, I look back at wengers 1st full 7 seasons at club and vs fergie and the score was wenger 3 fergie 4.hypothetically speaking @Amjid Javed and i know football does not work on ifs and buts.
If Arsenal won all their games from now until the end of the Season and so did City which would win them the title.
Would you still consider Arsenal/Arteta bottle jobs?
You never paid attention in the first place because I never said that Arteta is better than Wenger.I think it is his way of desperately wanting to be accepted by born and bred Brits through exaggeration.
I stopped paying serious attention when he claimed Arteta was better than Wenger.
They are not the same. The Arteta rebuild job would have been relatively easier to execute if City weren’t so dominant and powerful.They are the same, you are just describing the status quo when Arteta took over. You can do it in 1 sentence, not need for 2 paragraphs.
5 seasons is a lifetime in football. Arsenal were a nothing team 5 years after the invincibles."
They are not the same. Taking over Arsenal when they were struggling to stay in the top half of the table would have been less challenging if Pep's City did not exist"
@topspin @Technics 1210 @KingKhanWC - this is latest comedy gem from Mr zero ball knowledge
Arsenal in 5 seasons before Arteta
3rd, 2nd, 5th, 6th and 5th
But this is supposedly struggling to stay in top half of the table
Just to add in regards to missing out on titles, I look back at wengers 1st full 7 seasons at club and vs fergie and the score was wenger 3 fergie 4.
It should have been wenger 5 fergie 2.
Arsenal should have won back to back doubles in 97/98 and 98/99
Losing title away to Leeds, also the FA Cup semi final defeat where Bergkamp missed a penalty
Then 02/03 where Arsenal bottled a lead of 8 points in March.
Arsenal should have won 3 titles in a row back then.
Wenger took 3 titles, but to me he should have won 5. So I question the club any time it's fallen short.
Yet fans get offended over oh you can criticise Arteta the messiah
You never paid attention in the first place because I never said that Arteta is better than Wenger.
What I said was that if the 1996 version of Wenger had took over Arsenal in 2019, he wouldn’t have done any better than Arteta in these circumstances.
Imagine comparing Zinchenko to TAA
Or imagine saying Arsenal attackers need 40 G/A and then saying another player should be judged on how much space he creates
I understand Internet feeds into caves in Peshawar may effect TV signals, but the nonsense knows no limits
You mock the very football league you support a team from.please quote the post where I claimed that I watched the 92 World Cup.
If you can’t, apologize. So you have two options: either bottle it and get caught with your pants down or apologize for lying.
To be honest as fan since 1987 the most disappointing and hurtful defeats / not winning trophies for me are as follows (no particular order)That is a very fair analysis with and you are consistent.
I became a fan in 1993 so saw the Wenger Era in its fullest as well as GG.To be honest as fan since 1987 the most disappointing and hurtful defeats / not winning trophies for me are as follows (no particular order)
1991 FA cup semi final defeat vs Spurs (we only lost 3 games all season, but losing to scum 3-1 in semi final was hurtful)
1995 cup winners cup final - being the holders and having beat a star studded sampdoria in semis on penalties, losing to zaragoza in final, where ex spurs player nayim scored from half way line in extra time
Losing title in 98/99 - losing 1-0 to Leeds in 2nd to last game, plus the FA Cup semi was gutting, espcially as united won treble that year
Losing title 02/03 - United were nowhere near as good as Arsenal between 01/02 and 03/04, but losing that title in between was most Annoyed I've got with this club falling short.
So I've seen plenty of ups and some pretty demoralising times as well
Yeah the CL final was another one, to hold on for so long with 10 men and then lose.I became a fan in 1993 so saw the Wenger Era in its fullest as well as GG.
The lowest point for me has to be the Champions League final we lost. But yeah losing titles to United was horrible. Fergie and his antics worked.
More recently the Leicester season left me feeling rubbish. To beat Leicester the way we did with the Wellbeck goal to then go and lose to Swansea and terrible injury prone united team at OT. That was shameful cos that was our year. Liverpool and Man City hadn't found their feet.
Beautiful.I'm glad you see it. I don't know about you, but I think he's (Odegaard) a little bit overrated.
Halloween-gard has been poor all season, apart from 1 good game away to Bournemouth.
How many big clubs have a captain who dissapears so much or gets sub off so much. He's nothing more then a handpuppet captain for Arteta
Please quote the post where I claimed that I watched the 1992 World Cup.You got caught lying when you claimed you watched the 92 WC, and you have been caught lying now again.
Please quote the post where I claimed that I watched the 1992 World Cup.
Where does that say that I watched the World Cup?When you claime
When you claimed Pakistan fluked it to the final of 1992 cos of the rained off match vs England, only to be schooled that England got to the final when SA needed 22 of 1 vs England also due to the rain.
Jog on pal.
Beautiful.
I stand by the post which you've quoted and I've already schooled you on this topic. Even an injury prone Maddison who played for a relegated Leicester side has better a record of goal contributions than Odegaard in the PL ever since the Norwegian joined Arsenal.
But I would still pick Odegaard because Maddison is injury prone. If Maddison could stay fit, he would be playing for an elite club. Also, I never claimed ESR > Odegaard. But if the Hale End product could keep fit, I would argue he would have a higher ceiling because unlike our meek captain, he's not a mental midget. Odegaard is Arsenal's Babar Azam. Also, ESR was a clinical finisher before he was injured and he had more penetration because he wasn't afraid to be direct.
Also, the other reason why I think Odegaard is overhyped is because he does not belong in the league of top tier CAMs. He's below the likes of KDB, Bellingham, Foden (who can play as a CAM), Musiala, Wirtz and an old Modric. These guys are genuinely world-class.
There's no doubt that the Norweigan is very talented and is aesethically pleasing on the eye, which is another reason for the Babar Azam analogy, but his weak mentality is the reason why he'll fall short of making it as a top tier number 10. Real Madrid identified his mental frailties very early on and recognised that he wasn't to fit to wear the white shirt.
100%Honestly I was in awe of his performance. To be honest the games which we have lost he has not been bad either. Was majestic in the 1st half vs Villa and the 2-0 defeat to West Ham he was on it but we could not finish. He was even MOTM vs Bayern at the emirates.
For some reason people have personal agenda's against him. I find it odd as we are blessed to have such a baller. I still believe people watch football using stats rather then their eyes.
I know @Geordie Ahmed enjoyed that performance by him!
100%
I actually came to this thread with the intention of waxing lyrical about Odegaard
As a neutral (actually not fully as I wanted Arsenal to win as need Chelsea to stay behind us) he was an absolute joy to watch
I said it a while back he's ahead of Maddison and when he's at the top of his game like Tuesday night you realise there is levels to this game and Maddison isn't on his level
He's not just a technically gifted player that's a joy to watch he works so hard for the team, often being the one to lead the press.
What made it even better was listening to Ally McCoist sound so excited when talking about him.
If he can maintain this form until the end of the season and help deliver the title he should win player of the year (obviously still a few games to go so a lot can happen and also I think the voting is already closed so these performances won't have an impact in terms of player of the season)
I know this wasn't meant for me but I honestly believe Arteta is doing a fine job and success in the form of trophies will come in time and when they do it will be like an avalanchehypothetically speaking @Amjid Javed and i know football does not work on ifs and buts.
If Arsenal won all their games from now until the end of the Season and so did City which would win them the title.
Would you still consider Arsenal/Arteta bottle jobs?
I agree he has done a good job to get us where we are and we are close. We are a bloody good team.I know this wasn't meant for me but I honestly believe Arteta is doing a fine job and success in the form of trophies will come in time and when they do it will be like an avalanche
I can actually be unbiased about this. I don't support arsenal. He is doing better than what post 2005 wenger, emerywe've had 2 managers since wenger.
What a statement
Also best manager in last 15 years based on what?
1 trophy in 4.5 seasons in charge. Yet another fan who is rather clueless.
Arsenal's current 4 seasons without a trophy is worst in last decade for the club
You need toI know this wasn't meant for me but I honestly believe Arteta is doing a fine job and success in the form of trophies will come in time and when they do it will be like an avalanche
Now that Liverpool have chocked you supporting Arsenal or CityOh its a biggie coming up:
Spuds v Woolwich on Sunday.
I think Arsenal will win the league before you learn to spell choked.Now that Liverpool have chocked you supporting Arsenal or City
You need to
- Get to cup finals (zero in 4 seasons)
- perform in Europe (Very poor form)
- handle end of season (4 seasons worth of end of season failure)
That's only way trophies arrive.
I get the optimism but their is no proof that in last 4 seasons.
So not sure what trophies are going to arrive?
That's an honest question being asked here.
Bruno is a brilliant player. Him vs Odegaard is an interesting one. Both are equally great players but quite different. They can play in the same team together.The Maddison v Odegaard debate is interesting. I don't really like the player comparisons because it does depend on what team you end up in and how you are asked to play.
I am convinced that Bruno at City would not be playing like he does at united, and would be a world beater. (just by looking at how he does for Portugal)
Odegard's Norway have not made the euros and thats with him and Haaland up front. This is purely because of the support cast. Its different when you only have to play in one half of the pitch because your centre backs can cover half the pitch behind them, and the players behind you shut out the opposition down who can hardly get to your penalty area to have a shot. And you see a lot of the ball in a high possession team.
Bruno has to run like a mad man all over the pitch at united, which impacts what he does when he is on the ball too.
Nobody right now is able to say Bruno is better, but that chances created stat Mamoon shared now has bruno top with united having played one game less than arsenal. Oh and Odegard would not consider taking on the shot on his wrong foot like Bruno did.
Yes you got me - a spelling mistake.I think Arsenal will win the league before you learn to spell choked.
Have to be City otherwise I'll have to suffer 180 IQ man doing bhangra for the rest of the summer.Now that Liverpool have chocked you supporting Arsenal or City
Deep down, you are fully aware that you fumbled big time but you don’t have the chops to admit and you don’t want to get called out for it.
Anyone who knows anything about football can see that Odegaard is a world class attacking midfielder who was always better than the likes of Maddison and no, he is not a mental midget and Smith-Rowe never had more potential than him. "He had more penetration because he wasn’t afraid of being direct”. Is that supposed to be a dig at Odegaard, who scored 15 goals last season in spite of being one of the most creative players in the world and is in double digits again this season?
This guy is not a top tier CAM according to you. Are you even listening to yourself? At this point I am beginning to feel sorry for you. You don’t know where to hide now that your ridiculous tirade against Odegaard is coming back to haunt you.
As far as Real is concerned, Odegaard moved there was when he was a teenage boy and they had Kroos and Modric in their prime.
He was never going to get enough playing time there and he was too good to stunt his growth by being on the bench. He had to leave and Arsenal gave him the platform to show why he was a wonderkid and before Arsenal, he killed it at Sociedad which earned him the move to Arsenal.
Took me to school?Deep down, you are fully aware that you fumbled big time but you don’t have the chops to admit and you don’t want to get called out for it.
He was poor:
One of the main reasons why we keeping falling short is because Odegaard is mental midget, just like your beloved Babar Azam. There's a reason why he is referred to as Arsenal's Babar Azam by multiple posters.
- At the back end of 21/22 when Arsenal bottled top 4
- At the back end of last season when Arsenal bottled the title race
- First half of this season
- For Norway during the Euro qualifiers and has been terrible for them ever since he made his debut for them in national colours
Anyone who knows anything about football can see that Odegaard is a world class attacking midfielder who was always better than the likes of Maddison and no, he is not a mental midget and Smith-Rowe never had more potential than him. "He had more penetration because he wasn’t afraid of being direct”. Is that supposed to be a dig at Odegaard, who scored 15 goals last season in spite of being one of the most creative players in the world and is in double digits again this season?
This guy is not a top tier CAM according to you. Are you even listening to yourself? At this point I am beginning to feel sorry for you. You don’t know where to hide now that your ridiculous tirade against Odegaard is coming back to haunt you.
He is not a top tier CAM. I can name 8 x CAMs better than him.
\. He has achieved more goal contribtuions in the PL ever since Ode joined Arsenal, including a relegated Leicester side. 19 G/A in 30 PL matches for a relegated PL team is far more impressive than 22 G/A in 35 PL matches for one of the two best teams in the league.
As far as Real is concerned, Odegaard moved there was when he was a teenage boy and they had Kroos and Modric in their prime.
He was never going to get enough playing time there and he was too good to stunt his growth by being on the bench. He had to leave and Arsenal gave him the platform to show why he was a wonderkid and before Arsenal, he killed it at Sociedad which earned him the move to Arsenal.
I think Odegaard is supremely talented but he's overrated. He's not world class nor is he top tier CAM.
Took me to school?
I think it is the other way around. The fact that you compared Bellingham, Foden, Wirtz and Musiala who are all completely different footballers to Odegaard showed that you really don’t know the first thing about football.
You simply exposed yourself. I have already explained how and why those players are completely different to Odegaard and they cannot do what Odegaard does so you can’t use them as a stick to beat Odegaard with.
The only young player who has a similar profile to Odegaard is Barcelona’s Pedri.
Comparing Bellingham to Odegaard and bracketing them both as CAMs tells me that you shouldn’t even be allowed to talk about football, but I have to ask myself if that’s a bigger fumble than claiming that Maddison is better than Odegaard.
When Maddison got relegated and was up for grabs, Spurs were the only club who wanted him. If Odegaard wants to leave Arsenal now, you will have a host of top European clubs make a beeline for him.
Odegaard is a virtuoso midfielder and he has been absolutely phenomenal for two years now, if he is not world class and not a top-tier CAM, no one is.
This is one of the worst footballing opinions and hot takes I have had the displeasure of coming across.
I didn’t just take you to school, I fried up some chicken nuggets for you and sent you packing with a lunchbox.
60 million down the drain
Kai Havertz scores again
Topspin gets humiliated again
I will keep exposing agendaYou have more interest in point scoring than having any real meaningful football related discussions
Fighting a battle? My friend, I have to drop 30 IQ points to even have a discussion with you. You don’t realize that it is a waste of time for me to engage with someone who thinks that Shan Masood deserves to be the captain of the Pakistan Test team and Maddison is better than Odegaard and who is not a top-tier CAM.You're a fighting a battle that was lost a long time ago. As soon as I pulled out your gems and drove you out of this thread, you took desperate measures and went running off to a cricket forum and tagged me in some random thread because I ended you and you just couldn't get over it.
The fact that you are not getting it reinforces the fact that you don’t know anything football. It is understandable though - people who don’t know anything about football struggle to understand these intricacies and nuisances.Bellingham, Wirtz and Musiala all play as number 10s. Foden is a specialist right winger and I've made it clear that he can also play the number 10 role.
The fact that you don't know that they're all number 10s, or can play as number 10 in Foden's case, exposes your ignorance, not for the first time nor will it be for the last time.
When will you muster the courage to respond to post #928 in the Arteta thread?Those in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Speaking of "worst footballing opinions", can you advise which of these is the worst?
- nIcOlAs PePe Is OnE oF tHe HoTtEsT aSsEtS iN eUrOpE
- tItLe Is In ThE bAg
- ZiNcHeNkO iS aRsEnAl’s TaA
- mItoMa > mArTiNeLlI
- ArSeNaL aTtAcKeRs LiKe MaRtInElLi NeEd 40 G/a BuT hAvErTz ShOuLd Be JuDgEd On HoW mUcH sPaCe He CrEaTeS
- I wIlL bE hApPy To Go InTo NeXt SeAsOn WiTh HaVeRtZ aT cF
I have seen better LBs in League One than Zinchenko. Here you've been trying to justify his selection for Arsenal because you've got zero ball knowledge and as I said earlier, you're not here to have any meaningful discussion on football matters. You're just here to cheerlead for Arteta, just like the way Major does it for Misbah.
Odegaard is the major driving force behind Arsenal’s title charge of the last two seasons. He is one of the main reasons why fans like you have started dreaming of winning the league again. Give him the respect that he deserves while you pleasure yourself to the Maddison poster in your bedroom.You're acting as if Odegaard has already won Arsenal the Premier League. But the reality is it looks like City will win the title again for a 4th consecutive year. If that ends up being the case, I promise we'll revisit this discussion and this time I'll bury you by letting you know exactly where Odegaard was liable en route for Arsenal to fall short of winning the title.
I will keep exposing agenda
Fighting a battle? My friend, I have to drop 30 IQ pointsto even have a discussion with you. You don’t realize that it is a waste of time for me to engage with someone who thinks that Shan Masood deserves to be the captain of the Pakistan Test team and Maddison is better than Odegaard and who is not a top-tier CAM.
The fact that I still engage with you after you harbor such unintelligent and poor opinions means that you should be a little grateful to me.
The fact that you are not getting it reinforces the fact that you don’t know anything football. It is understandable though - people who don’t know anything about football struggle to understand these intricacies and nuisances.
Wirtz, Musiala and Foden are all winger/AM hybrids. They are completely different players to Odegaard. They cannot fit into the Arsenal as a like for like replacement.
Let me educate you on the difference - Wirtz, Musiala and Foden play on the wings in 4-3-3 and a number 10 in 4-2-3-1.
Odegaard plays as a number 10 in 4-2-3-1 and and an RCM in a 4-3-3. Musiala, Wirtz and Foden are too attack minded to play RCM/LCM in 4-3-3.
Odegaard cannot play on the wings in 4-3-3 just like De Bruyne cannot. Like De Bruyne, is a pure attacking midfielder, not a winger/attacking midfielder hybrid.
As far as Bellingham is coming is concerned, he is a B2B midfielder. The reason why he has been playing in a very advanced role and getting lots of goals this season is because Madrid have been playing without a proper striker.
Vini Jr and Rodrygo are wingers (I hope you know that but I wouldn’t put it past you) and Bellingham has often played as a false 9 at times and has had the space to push forward.
When Mbappe joins in the summer, Madrid will revert back to its traditional 4-3-3 which would mean that Bellingham would slot into his more natural deeper role where he will have to do a lot of defending as well.
There is a clear distinction between a player like Odegaard/De Bruyne and Bellingham and the type of midfielders that they are.
When will you muster the courage to respond to post #928 in the Arteta thread?
Odegaard is the major driving force behind Arsenal’s title charge of the last two seasons. He is one of the main reasons why fans like you have started dreaming of winning the league again. Give him the respect that he deserves while you pleasure yourself to the Maddison poster in your bedroom.
Harry Kane has 35 goals in the Bundesliga this season but he won’t win the league this season. Does that mean Kane fell short?
Ronaldo scored 312 goals in La Liga in 9 seasons and didn’t win the league in 7 out of 9 occasions. Does that mean he fell short and his goals were useless barring two seasons?
Odegaard has been sensational since the start of the 2022/23 season and he is a world class player and one of the very best in his position.
Surely notHuge turning point the disallowed goal and then punishing spurs at other end
0-2
Brilliant start
Offside is offside, spurs were always going to create. But we have punished them twice.A couple of warning signs for Arsenal, luckily for them Van De Ven was just offside
I never said it wasn't offsideOffside is offside, spurs were always going to create. But we have punished them twice.
Not fortunate at all, its offside.I never said it wasn't offside
But when the margin is so tight it's obviously fortunate
OkayNot fortunate at all, its offside.
Whether it's 1cm or 1 yard it offside.
YeahHavertz been brilliant when it's mattered. A clutch player
Maddison is a good player. He doesn’t deserve to be subjected to this criticism.
0% ball knowledge.Havertz's signing will be the end of Arteta.
0-6 - 1935And that's game over
Arsenal are incredible at set pieces, it's such a huge weapon
This is going to be a Rugby score, can get messy for Spurs