jnaveen1980
Test Star
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2016
- Runs
- 37,519
They can consider playing Rizwan ahead of Saud Shakeel assuming he plays the next test too.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Yeah I was thinking the same they need to change both players batting numberThey can consider playing Rizwan ahead of Saud Shakeel assuming he plays the next test too.
I think you are being harsh.How can Pakistan team expect to win here is list of loosers
1 Abdullah butter hand lost the match
2. Two free wicket of imam ul haq handed to Ausie.. by professor hafeez.
3. babar and saud Shakeel can't bat.. looks like goats sent in to fight lions...
I would play Abrar, his kind of spin and the bounce he will get in sydney could be the difference..i remember When india toured in 2018 Kulldeep got a 5ver, abrar is similar. as to who to drop - yeah - hasan is the obvious guy....the big pic is one of Shan who is the captain and babar the main player have to score in spades, that will give the backbone for a big score.Yeah but who to drop for abrar ? I'm sure imam will be dropped for saim maybe. And I'm liking 4 fast bowler strategy but I would drop hassan ali for abrar
Typical social media over reaction. Joe root has failed so many times in Aus,This Saud dude scores just 20s and 30s. Not sure what his utility is. They might as well play a bowler in place of him. He doesn't look assured. May be Sarfraz in place of him.
Totally -we needed to have proper warm ups. The batters now have had enough in innings but we are 2 down.Saim for imam and I don't think they will drop any other batsmen Australia tour never been easy
Yes it was wrong decision at the toss but we would have found other ways to loseTremendous Test match - nothing can be compared with a hard fought close Test Match, that too the Boxing Day fixture at MCG. This is the best I have seen from PAK team in Australian Test in last 27 years (34, if I consider active rubber) & lots of credit should go to Shan & Hafeez.
I think, PAK dropped few crucial catches (but took some brilliant ones as well), conceded too many extras and allowed Australian bottom half to score too many (& too quickly) - eventually ended up with just too much to chase.
BUT, at the end I’ll stick to my day 1 assessment - PAK lost this Test because they (& PP as well) didn’t believe that they can compete with AUS and gifted the initiative - unless it’s a very, very special case, you don’t bowl first at MCG, probably the most difficult place to compete with Aussies, batting second.
I don’t know what experts said about the wicket, but I have seen more Boxing Day Tests at MCG than most and on day 1 that was a very typical MCG track, albeit on in a cloudy day, which provided lots of movement on day 1, but with spongy bounce, which often gives an impression of unplayable conditions, but MCG track gets harder and faster on Day 2, always - it gets tougher on day two as the ball zips through & comes at pace. Also, more than first innings, PAK let the chance to bat on day 3/4 without pressure and bowl on 4th innings with a target to defend - probably a target of 170 could have been tight for Aussies, anything over 225, PAK’s game to loose.
Eventually, match innings were 328, 264, 262 & 237, gradually declining team total with all 10 4th innings wickets taken by Aussie pacers, at least half of those for uneven bounce and Lyon almost made a hundred out of 237, @ 4.5 suggested it was a bat first track.
Why?Well fought boys however any team that chooses Rizwan over Sarfraz deserves to lose
That was a critical critical drop. I don't know of a cliche that's more true than "catches win matches"Thinking again, one can't blame on one drop catch to lose the match. Yes it was a major chance but who knows then later any other player went on to score big? Aus should have been taken out with less than 100 despite the opportunities, with that kind of start. Also, the batting needs to be better - specially from the known players like Babar. Only Shan and Rizwan played positively but even they couldn't stay on. Rizwan is any day better than Sarfaraz but he needs to also play longer innings. Hassan Ali doesn't even deserve a place - he's a gone case.
That was a critical critical drop. I don't know of a cliche that's more true than "catches win matches"
However for me that collapse from 124-1 to 150-5 was where the match was lost right then
Tremendous Test match - nothing can be compared with a hard fought close Test Match, that too the Boxing Day fixture at MCG. This is the best I have seen from PAK team in Australian Test in last 27 years (34, if I consider active rubber) & lots of credit should go to Shan & Hafeez.
I think, PAK dropped few crucial catches (but took some brilliant ones as well), conceded too many extras and allowed Australian bottom half to score too many (& too quickly) - eventually ended up with just too much to chase.
BUT, at the end I’ll stick to my day 1 assessment - PAK lost this Test because they (& PP as well) didn’t believe that they can compete with AUS and gifted the initiative - unless it’s a very, very special case, you don’t bowl first at MCG, probably the most difficult place to compete with Aussies, batting second.
I don’t know what experts said about the wicket, but I have seen more Boxing Day Tests at MCG than most and on day 1 that was a very typical MCG track, albeit on in a cloudy day, which provided lots of movement on day 1, but with spongy bounce, which often gives an impression of unplayable conditions, but MCG track gets harder and faster on Day 2, always - it gets tougher on day two as the ball zips through & comes at pace. Also, more than first innings, PAK let the chance to bat on day 3/4 without pressure and bowl on 4th innings with a target to defend - probably a target of 170 could have been tight for Aussies, anything over 225, PAK’s game to loose.
Eventually, match innings were 328, 264, 262 & 237, gradually declining team total with all 10 4th innings wickets taken by Aussie pacers, at least half of those for uneven bounce and Lyon almost made a hundred out of 237, @ 4.5 suggested it was a bat first track.
How can Abdullah perform, We need his talent self to practice more in the nets.Tremendous Test match - nothing can be compared with a hard fought close Test Match, that too the Boxing Day fixture at MCG. This is the best I have seen from PAK team in Australian Test in last 27 years (34, if I consider active rubber) & lots of credit should go to Shan & Hafeez.
I think, PAK dropped few crucial catches (but took some brilliant ones as well), conceded too many extras and allowed Australian bottom half to score too many (& too quickly) - eventually ended up with just too much to chase.
BUT, at the end I’ll stick to my day 1 assessment - PAK lost this Test because they (& PP as well) didn’t believe that they can compete with AUS and gifted the initiative - unless it’s a very, very special case, you don’t bowl first at MCG, probably the most difficult place to compete with Aussies, batting second.
I don’t know what experts said about the wicket, but I have seen more Boxing Day Tests at MCG than most and on day 1 that was a very typical MCG track, albeit on in a cloudy day, which provided lots of movement on day 1, but with spongy bounce, which often gives an impression of unplayable conditions, but MCG track gets harder and faster on Day 2, always - it gets tougher on day two as the ball zips through & comes at pace. Also, more than first innings, PAK let the chance to bat on day 3/4 without pressure and bowl on 4th innings with a target to defend - probably a target of 170 could have been tight for Aussies, anything over 225, PAK’s game to loose.
Eventually, match innings were 328, 264, 262 & 237, gradually declining team total with all 10 4th innings wickets taken by Aussie pacers, at least half of those for uneven bounce and Lyon almost made a hundred out of 237, @ 4.5 suggested it was a bat first track.
Unless the Aus captain is Tim PaineAustralia don’t lose at home - unless the other team is India
2018 series Aus really were reeling after sandpaper gate but 2020 was a remarkable series Victory. Got to appreciate thatUnless the Aus captain is Tim Paine
Who won the series in Australia when Tim paine was the captain? AnyoneUnless the Aus captain is Tim Paine
I still can't believe we won the series there last time and especially the Gabba test without Kohli, Bumrah, Shami, Ashwin and Jadeja. It is mind boggling how a bowling attack of T.Natarajan, Siraj (on debut), Shardul and Washington Sundar beat a full strength Australian team with players at their prime.
Looking at the way Aussies always decimates England and now Pakistan is sitting at 16 consecutive test loses, those two series win by India, especially the one in 2020 makes it even more special. I am sure it will be spoken and remembered for a very long time.
Maybe a crumb of comfort for the indians . Very little else to cheer about when it comes to success in the last decade lol
Good chance BCCI paid them off. Even you as a hardcore fan still can’t wrap your mind around how they did it, so it shows that those victories could happen 1 way only.I still can't believe we won the series there last time and especially the Gabba test without Kohli, Bumrah, Shami, Ashwin and Jadeja. It is mind boggling how a bowling attack of T.Natarajan, Siraj (on debut), Shardul and Washington Sundar beat a full strength Australian team with players at their prime.
Looking at the way Aussies always decimates England and now Pakistan is sitting at 16 consecutive test loses, those two series win by India, especially the one in 2020 makes it even more special. I am sure it will be spoken and remembered for a very long time.
During his tenure only India (twice), Pak, SL and Nz travelled to Australia. Two strong test teams, Eng and SA didn't tour to Australia during his time. They could have won.Who won the series in Australia when Tim paine was the captain? Anyone
Yes, undoubtedly India played exceptionally well after humiliating 36 all out. But Tim Paine was equally bad as a captain. Any other captain like Cummins would have made it extremely difficult for India.2018 series Aus really were reeling after sandpaper gate but 2020 was a remarkable series Victory. Got to appreciate that
You don't know what you have just watched for 4 days.Australia deserve to win the match. Half of the team are over-aged/parchi. Should deserve 3-0 loss.
We need to end the streak. We can match these guys and I would rather end the streak against this Aus team then the lesser team we will be facing when we next have a tour (given all the players who will have retired)Need to drop Abdullah to teach him a lesson. Imam needs the boot as well. Need to play 2 spinners at SCG.
Series is lost now. Rest Shaheen and pick Wasim Jr.
One time Aus batting was decimated after sandpaper gate,During his tenure only India (twice), Pak, SL and Nz travelled to Australia. Two strong test teams, Eng and SA didn't tour to Australia during his time. They could have won.
Of course it was a great performance.I still can't believe we won the series there last time and especially the Gabba test without Kohli, Bumrah, Shami, Ashwin and Jadeja. It is mind boggling how a bowling attack of T.Natarajan, Siraj (on debut), Shardul and Washington Sundar beat a full strength Australian team with players at their prime.
Looking at the way Aussies always decimates England and now Pakistan is sitting at 16 consecutive test loses, those two series win by India, especially the one in 2020 makes it even more special. I am sure it will be spoken and remembered for a very long time.
That is not actually true- because whilst it was a total cock up -they recovered from that cock up with useful contributions from Jamal and Shaheen and then reducing Aus to16-4 second time out.As I said earlier, Pakistan dominated this Test but lost it in one moment of madness in the 1st innings when they collapsed from 124-1 to 150-5.
That, there was the end of this Test.
Good chance BCCI paid them off. Even you as a hardcore fan still can’t wrap your mind around how they did it, so it shows that those victories could happen 1 way only.
At least one of those wins was paid for. Perks of having a filthy rich board. Also them visiting Australia every single year made it so like they were playing in their vacation home.
Pak played way better in test 2 after being used to Aussie conditions. If Pakistan showed up every year, they too would win 1 series eventually.
Of course it was a great performance.
We have also proved we can take 20 wickets with second choice bowlers which is good.
There are 2 other main differences to how and why you got over the line. This Australian batting line up is better than what you faced. Smith is slightly worse than 2021 but everybody else bar Warner is better and they had Matthew Wade playing as a batter as well as Harris. Since Khawaja moved up their batting definately is stronger. Carey is also better than Paine.
The other thing is the amount of time your batters have to acclimatise. India played T20s, ODIs, and tour games before playing 4 tests (and it was the 4th test in which the series was won on each occasion)
This meant your batters were at their best coming into the decider.
Highlights of Day 4Peerless Cummins leads Aussies to big Test win
Pat Cummins completes a 10-wicket match haul in Australia's 79-run win to take an unassailable 2-0 series lead
A contentious caught behind decision that required forensic study of Mohammad Rizwan's right forearm eventually cost the Pakistan keeper-batter his wicket and his team a shot at a drought-breaking Test win in Australia.
In a dramatic final half-hour at the MCG, what loomed as a tense day-five run chase ended as a 79-run win for Australia after Rizwan's removal sparked a complete capitulation in the face of sustained, aggressive fast bowling by Pat Cummins' team.
The win from nowhere was achieved at 6.21pm local time, and came courtesy of a couple of sensational diving catches from Mitchell Marsh and Steve Smith as Pakistan's tailenders fended away a relentless bouncer barrage.
Rizwan was looming as the potential hero in an unlikely run chase of 317 for Pakistan's first Test win here since 1995 when he was adjudged caught behind as he attempted to duck a searing Cummins bouncer.
Cummins was convinced he had his man even though umpire Michael Gough denied the appeal, and Rizwan immediately pointed to what he indicated was the point of impact just below his right elbow.
However, television footage indicated the ball had brushed the right-hander much further down and had made contact with the elasticised wristband on his batting glove which – under the Laws of cricket – rendered him out.
The vehemence of Rizwan's defence coupled with the length of time taken for third umpire Richard Illingworth to reach the decision that sent a clearly aggrieved batter on his way ensure the crucial moment in Pakistan's brave chase of victory became enshrouded with conjecture.
Rizwan's capacity to revel in seemingly lost causes was well known to Australia before we went to the wicket today with Pakistan 4-146 and holding dwindling hopes after the dismissal of their most accomplished batter, Babar Azam.
It was the feisty keeper's patient 104 not out on the final day at Karachi in 2022 that prevented Australia closing out a beckoning Test win, and the 95 he scored in a 132-run partnership with Babr at Brisbane on his team's previous tour here provided a rare act of defiance in an otherwise lopsided campaign.
But not even Rizwan's dogged defiance, nor his steadfast reluctance to leave the field after a prolonged third-umpire examination of the evidence after Australia's call for review, could prevent his innings ending on 35.
His displeasure was shared by batting partner Salman Ali Agha who repeatedly pointed to his own forearm while gesticulating to on-field umpires Gough and Joel Wilson, despite the final decision resting in the hands of their off-field colleague.
When confirmation of the dismissal was finally shown on the electronic scoreboards, Rizwan continued to plead his case before eventually retrieving the bat, gloves and helmet he has discarded on pitch edge and stalking from the field in simmering fury.
With him went Pakistan's last realistic hope of reeling in the 97 runs then needed for a remarkable outright win, with only the tailenders to partner Salman in their forlorn quest.
However, no sooner had Rizwan departed than Cummins had Aamir Jamal bunt a return catch off another brutal bouncer, at which point Australia claimed the additional half-hour's play that is offered when a result is imminent.
And during that extended session, as shadows lengthened across the MCG, Cummins completed a 10-wicket haul for the match before Mitchell Starc snared 2-0 from consecutive deliveries as Pakistan's last three wickets fell without adding a run.
Despite Rizwan's obvious confidence that he could carry his team across the line prior to his contentious demise, the truth remained it was always an outside hope after Pakistan's best batting hopes had succumbed earlier in the innings.
Much of that burden lay with skipper Shan Masood and his captaincy predecessor Babar.
After Abdullah Shafique fell to a sharp slips catch by Usman Khawaja – itself, a moment steeped in irony given the far simpler chance Shafique shelled in that position a day earlier – and his opening partner Imam-ul-Haq was trapped lbw, the dream team set off in pursuit of the remaining 268 runs.
It was never going to be a straightforward task.
Only one touring team in the past 15 years has scored more than 317 in the fourth innings to win a Test in Australia, and that was India's history-making 329 to secure a series victory at the Gabba three summers ago.
But Shan, who had begun this tour with a regal double-century against a Cricket Australia XI at Canberra, showed he was up for the fight in a tough start to his innings.
The left-hander was struck a painful blow to the midriff by a Hazlewood short ball having scored just one, and added only 11 more before it seemed his defiance had met a premature end.
Masood was adjudged lbw by umpire Wilson in spinner Nathan Lyon's first over of the innings, but eventually opted to invoke captain's privilege with a review that most onlookers deemed to be speculative at best.
But to the surprise of many and the incredulity of a few – most notably Lyon, who slapped a hand to his head in silent shock – ball tracking technology showed the delivery bouncing well over the stumps even though it made contact with the knee roll of the batter's front pad.
When Cummins belatedly brought himself into the attack immediately after lunch, he got a fearsome short ball to climb at Shan's neck and in an instinctive move to deflect it away on the leg side the skipper copped a painful thud on the fingers.
However, having weathered that latest storm and the loss of Imam – who was fortunate to survive a confident lbw shout from Cummins but not so lucky against a second one two balls later – Shan began to blossom and Pakistan fans dared to dream.
At the other end, Babar was finally finding the sort of touch that earned him the title of Pakistan's best contemporary Test batter but which he had found frustratingly elusive across a handful of low scores in the series.
Like his captain, Babar was subjected to a reviewed lbw shout (from Hazelwood) early in his innings, but again the technology confirmed a ball the Australians felt was destined for the stumps was, in fact, clearing them quite comfortably.
More importantly, Babar seemed to have tightened up the defensive flaw that allowed Cummins to rattle his stumps in the first innings of this match, when the Australia skipper scythed what he described as "a dream ball" between his bat and pad.
And Cummins' capacity to produce those wicket-taking deliveries when most needed again came to the fore when his relentless targeting of the Pakistan pair's front pad led Shan to edge a low catch to second slip where Smith gleefully hung on.
And just as speculation began to simmer that Babar might reach 50 for the first time in the series and push on further to put his team within sight of triumph, the technical flaw exposed in the first innings reappeared and was duly exploited.
This time it was Hazlewood who landed a ball on the challenging length that lured Babar half-forward but not so committed that his front pad protected his stumps.
As a result, when Hazlewood extracted exaggerated movement from the well-grassed surface the sight of Babar's stumps being dismantled played out in near identical circumstances to Wednesday evening and the Australians' celebration was equally animated.
At 4-146, the goal of 317 was disappearing fast in the distance and became significantly further beyond reach when Shakeel – who had begun his maiden Australia campaign with a lofty Test average above 80 – was caught behind trying to uppercut a lifter from Starc.
It left renowned counter-puncher Rizwan as Pakistan's last recognised batter, with only spin-bowling allrounder Salman and four seamers with questionable batting credentials to find the 155 runs needed.
That goal would have been decidedly less imposing if not for Carey's invaluable half-century earlier in the day, and the 73 runs he was able to add with Australia's tailenders after his team resumed on 8-187 this morning.
Carey's output with the bat since back-to-back half centuries in the first two Tests of Australia's World Test Championship final and Ashes sojourn earlier this year has come under increasing scrutiny, despite his glovework – the skill for which he is selected – being mostly flawless.
However, on a pitch where more credentialled batters have struggled throughout this Test, the 32-year-old was rarely troubled as he took the lead in productive alliances formed productive alliances with Starc (partnership of 22), Cummins (28), Lyon (12) and Hazlewood (13).
Peerless Cummins leads Aussies to big Test win | cricket.com.au
Pat Cummins completes a 10-wicket match haul in Australia's 79-run win to take an unassailable 2-0…www.cricket.com.au
17th loss in a row Aus were probably bored of thrashing Pak took this game easily.Australia are not invincible at home. They are of course very strong but this Aussie team also collapses and looks flat for long stretches. Problem is in Tests you need to capitalize on the weaknesses. Pakistan wasnt able to deliver the finish blow when they needed to and let them escape.
At 16-4 this match was very very winnable but letting them get to 264 was a huge failure
Reminds me of David Lloyd's "we flippin murdered them" after England drew to Zimbabwe when he was coach.Hafeez claimed that Pakistan were the superior of the two sides at the Test match: “I will sum up: our Pakistan team played better than the other team in general. Our batting intent was better. Our bowling was hitting in the right areas.
The end result 3-0 was never in doubt. It's the journey that matters. Can be a boring one or an exciting one. Like a road trip. Destination is the same - how you get there makes it interestingRoutine defeat for Pakistan nothing unusual all going according to the rule we are destined for whitewash unless something extraordinary happens
If you do the maths then the dropped catch of Marsh was the the massive turning point.Thinking again, one can't blame on one drop catch to lose the match. Yes it was a major chance but who knows then later any other player went on to score big? Aus should have been taken out with less than 100 despite the opportunities, with that kind of start. Also, the batting needs to be better - specially from the known players like Babar. Only Shan and Rizwan played positively but even they couldn't stay on. Rizwan is any day better than Sarfaraz but he needs to also play longer innings. Hassan Ali doesn't even deserve a place - he's a gone case.
This AUS team is already beatable with their talismanic trio of quicks ageing. Maybe Head would open after Warner's gone to keep the shock and awe factor intact up top. But Smith has been milquetoast lately and Marnus has proven to be a chinese imitation of SS. Batting lacks steel and durability, forget the intimidation factor of past.
If Cummins is ever unavailable then this team is ripe to be whitewashed at home. Just like India, this is a team in transition.
Actually that is quite not true.Australia are not invincible at home. They are of course very strong but this Aussie team also collapses and looks flat for long stretches. Problem is in Tests you need to capitalize on the weaknesses. Pakistan wasnt able to deliver the finish blow when they needed to and let them escape.
At 16-4 this match was very very winnable but letting them get to 264 was a huge failure
Actually that is quite not true.
If you expect sides to collapse from 16-4 to 100 all out then your expecation is way too high.
Good teams will always find a way to score 200 to 250 odd runs from 20 for 4.
The onus was on batsmen to somehow bat out of their skin and gain a memorable victory.
Bowlers can only do so much and dropped catch while bad still asked Pakistan to chase 300 for a historic win.
I genuinely think the two teams are equal.
Right now the only difference is that our batters need a couple of extra warm ups, and Australia have their first choice eleven and we don't.
( Catching is also a difference)
Good work from the boys.
We just need the PCB managing these tours better to give us a chance
Tremendous Test match - nothing can be compared with a hard fought close Test Match, that too the Boxing Day fixture at MCG. This is the best I have seen from PAK team in Australian Test in last 27 years (34, if I consider active rubber) & lots of credit should go to Shan & Hafeez.
I think, PAK dropped few crucial catches (but took some brilliant ones as well), conceded too many extras and allowed Australian bottom half to score too many (& too quickly) - eventually ended up with just too much to chase.
BUT, at the end I’ll stick to my day 1 assessment - PAK lost this Test because they (& PP as well) didn’t believe that they can compete with AUS and gifted the initiative - unless it’s a very, very special case, you don’t bowl first at MCG, probably the most difficult place to compete with Aussies, batting second.
I don’t know what experts said about the wicket, but I have seen more Boxing Day Tests at MCG than most and on day 1 that was a very typical MCG track, albeit on in a cloudy day, which provided lots of movement on day 1, but with spongy bounce, which often gives an impression of unplayable conditions, but MCG track gets harder and faster on Day 2, always - it gets tougher on day two as the ball zips through & comes at pace. Also, more than first innings, PAK let the chance to bat on day 3/4 without pressure and bowl on 4th innings with a target to defend - probably a target of 170 could have been tight for Aussies, anything over 225, PAK’s game to loose.
Eventually, match innings were 328, 264, 262 & 237, gradually declining team total with all 10 4th innings wickets taken by Aussie pacers, at least half of those for uneven bounce and Lyon almost made a hundred out of 237, @ 4.5 suggested it was a bat first track.
I agree Warner is the absolute key wicket.About toss decision that was a good call fielding first on this surface. May not work everywhere as Australia can completely bat Pakistan out of the Test in some places. Having said that if Warner gets going against Pakistan it would not matter batting first or batting second. Pakistan can totally wilt. His dismissal made the contest even.
The thing that annoyed me was hearing the Aussie players on the stump mic saying things like it hit you on the glove "Champ" to rizwan who is the nicest bloke. Things like that
Pakistan need to stop being so overly friendly and treat the opposition how the opposition treat them.
Indian players had the right approach to fight fire with fire with the Aussies even though they are abit too egotistic for the most part lol
For context I was only born in pakistan but grew up as a kid and lived my whole life in aus by the way so I know the difference between abit of banter and getting riled up and being aggressive from a culture point of view
We got ourselves in a winning position despite limited resources so what does that tell you.You cannot fight fire with fire without quality and resources.