Justcrazy
ATG
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2010
- Runs
- 109,166
Rohit sharma comes as first change.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why the heck is Bhuvenswar Kumar always in the ODI side when Dhoni is captaining ???? This is poor, Dhoni's fetish for trundlers.
We were the first team to try DRS in 2008-09 when we toured Lanka.
But then projected paths were used to give LBWs without the umpire call. So even if it slightly brushed the bails of leg stump the umpire decision was overturned and given out .
Jayawardne being a much better captain than Kumble used it much more effectively .Even though Mendis was the biggest factor in our test series loss the DRS played a big part in it.So most Indian players who played in that series just don't trust the Hawkeye part in DRS.
What's the point of playing with 5 bowlers when you are going to make a batsman bowl?
Watching smith try playing every ball on the leg side is a real eye sore!
And our statsman Shiva has dug this out: Four India bowlers have dismissed both the openers on ODI debut before Sran: Avishkar Salvi, Tinu Yohannnan, M Venkataramana and Eknath Solkar. None went on to play ten ODIs though
From CI.
Rohit ahead of Yadav. Dhoni and his stupidities
Agreed.. not one shot is good looking..
Dhoni must be thinking "Rohit has had a brilliant day with the bat. Why not bowl him, maybe its his lucky day"
Dhoni must be thinking "Rohit has had a brilliant day with the bat. Why not bowl him, maybe its his lucky day"
Not sure why he always makes such moves and releases all the pressure. There was absolutely no need of bringing Rohit at that time.
Not sure why he always makes such moves and releases all the pressure. There was absolutely no need of bringing Rohit at that time.
He misses Raina's bowling and wanted to see if Rohit could fill the void. That's the only explanation
51 partnership already.
Where is Indian version of Mustafiz???
There is no point in taking Rahane over Raina in LOI imo.
WHat did you expect? Aussies are always in the game
In AUstralia, it's Rahana over Raina always. If India is 50/3, who would you want to bat? Rahane or Raina?
Raina over Rahane in subcontinent though
Doesn't drive or cut at all. Only glances,flicks and pulls.
He is a one-of-a-kind bowler.
Will go down as an ATG bowler. Impossible to hit due to his variations, and can also bowl 140+.
No offence but Smith and Bailey are the kind of batsmen people should be paid to watch.![]()
Raina's LOI performance in England has also been very good.TBH i don't think Rahane makes any difference in Australia.
Mustafiz from BD or Mustafiz from Ind?
Mustafiz from BD or Mustafiz from Ind?
His innings against SA in Melbourne was a master class. He just needs to totate the strike like ROhit or Kohli and he will be very good.
They aren't hitting boundaries, but still maintaining good RR.
RR is 7. It's unlike the AUS teams we know. THey usually go bang bang in the first 15. Decent bowling by Indians except for ROhit
Aussies need 7 an over already and our best bowler hasn't even bowled yet .
If Ashwin bowls well we will win from here
He goes for the surprise factor.
I mean who would think Rohit is gonna get a bowl in the match?
Maybe not even Rohit himself!
Problem is part-time must be spot on for the surprise to work.
For a batsmen as limited to glances, pulls and flicks its a wonder he scores tons and tons of runs.
Can anyone explain how Steven Smith manages to keep scoring with his limited shots?
Have to bowl wicket taking deliveries.
No point keeping it tight. Youw ill still go for 5 runs easily.
Neither. I'll reserve my judgement on Mustafiz from BD until T20 WC.