Babar Azam vs Travis Head - Who is the better batter in all formats?

Who is the better ODI batter?


  • Total voters
    15
HTB Head's stats conclusively prove that Babar > Head in Tests. In ODI it is not even close right now, Head is not even 1/3 of the way there. Only in T20I there is a discussion because of Babar's poor form of late and even that will be changed soon enough.
 
Head’s future is very bright if Australia continues to have tons of fixtures against India every year

Kaptaana has recently scored some slow ODI runs against SA but he has been out of form for a while now. He will need to score some daddy hundreds to earn back the respect of fans.

At the moment Head is a more valuable player. But things can easily flip in a matter of weeks.
 
in all formats obviously Head is ahead but in ODIs i will go with Babar Azam as u can rely on him but travis head is an attacking player so chance of throwing his wicket would be so high there.
 
:yk
in all formats obviously Head is ahead but in ODIs i will go with Babar Azam as u can rely on him but travis head is an attacking player so chance of throwing his wicket would be so high there.
Head scored a match winning century in the final against India. Australia were rocking!
 
in all formats obviously Head is ahead but in ODIs i will go with Babar Azam as u can rely on him but travis head is an attacking player so chance of throwing his wicket would be so high there.
Babar has 5 centuries against wi, 2 against 2019 C string aus, 1 against Nepal, 2 vs Zimbabwe, and 1 against C string NZ?

That's 11 centuries against rubbish opposition.

If Sachin, Head, Kohli and many others played againat such attacks then they'd avg 100+ with 200 SR's??

And same qith bumrah, Had bumrah played vs Nepal, he'd surpass even murli in wickets, Have a better er then Garner and mchrath in odi, and probs be the first bowler ever to take triple hatricks against a single opposition in a single game.

However BCCI and CA isn't stupid. They know full well not to waste their A tier players againat rubbish for fear that their quality might decline if they get use to such attacks.

Infact I can't even recall the last time someone like Head or kohli played vs Zimbabwe in a bi laterals? Unless it's tournaments, India and Australia always opt for c sides against sides like these?
 
in all formats obviously Head is ahead but in ODIs i will go with Babar Azam as u can rely on him but travis head is an attacking player so chance of throwing his wicket would be so high there.
In Tests it's definitely not clear cut. Head is a proven home track bully in tests within average of 32 outside of his beloved Australian grounds which is just better than a tailender average.
 
Head’s future is very bright if Australia continues to have tons of fixtures against India every year

Kaptaana has recently scored some slow ODI runs against SA but he has been out of form for a while now. He will need to score some daddy hundreds to earn back the respect of fans.

At the moment Head is a more valuable player. But things can easily flip in a matter of weeks.
Agree with your first sentence but it needs to be in Australia. Outside of Australia Head has shown he is a mediocre HTB with an average of 32 and 0 away centuries (1 neutral century). All the intent and aggression only works for him in Aus and on his own pitches
 
Travis head is in the class of Warner and gilchrist. The only issue is that he started late and hence during his early years wasn't able to replace finch.

Hence he likely won't finish with the sake run tally and century tally as gilly or Warner as he simply doesn't have time to catch up. But class wise he's = to them.

Babar's real class is on par with batters like Labu, Latham, Will young and these such players. Aka good decent batters but nothing special.

Talent wise he isn't even in bootlicking distance of aussie openers or top orders like Hayden, Martin, Pointing, Smith, Travis, Warner, gilly etc etc

Babar wouldn't even fetch a price in IPL if pk players were allowed since he can't even fetch a price for the 100. Yet Travis is one of the highest selling machines for IPL.

The gulf between these 2 is enormous.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ATG Travis head in matches in Test cricket averages:

38 in England...wow!
47 in India - very short sample size and boosted by a 90 in a drawn game where India scored closed to 600 lol
17 in New Zealand - wow!
22 in Pakistan - wow!
7 in Sri Lanka - wow!
30 in UAE - wow!

Travis is nothing but a home track bully - a one off WTC performance on a flat Oval pitch against an Indian attack which did not even have Bumrah means jack. Even Ashwin had a great performance in the WTC final he played in rainy conditions but certain fans will not wax lyricals about that.

This is Travis Head outside of his flat Aussie decks:

View attachment 148892

Average 32 with 1 centuries (ZERO centuries away from home, 1 in neutral venue)...and this guy is supposed to be some ATG lol!

@shariqnoor @heddie19 @Caved12 @Ahmed216 @Rana @shaz619 @Mamoon @Bhaijaan @Nikhil_cric @RedwoodOriginal
@atreus numbers are clear. Head 8 of his 9 centuries in Aus, 0 centuries away from home. Averages 32 away from Australia. Numbers bear it out that he's a HTB. Aggressive, intent, all the buzzwords only apply in Aus.
 
@atreus numbers are clear. Head 8 of his 9 centuries in Aus, 0 centuries away from home. Averages 32 away from Australia. Numbers bear it out that he's a HTB. Aggressive, intent, all the buzzwords only apply in Aus.
He literally singlehandedly won Australia the 2023 WTC, no one cares if he performs in some random series in Sri Lanka or West Indies in front of that achievement.
 
Haha ok, so using that logic Jamieson > Imran Khan, Steyn and everyone else. Also scoring a 100 on a flat oval track against a middling Indian attack where Smith also scored a 100 is not "singlehandedly" winning lol.

Fact is for all his supposed intent aggression, Head has ZERO away test centuries and 8 out of 9 in Aus LOL. If that was Babar he would have been crucified for such a HTB record.
 
babaar has a better away avg in tests and a better cover drive.so babar>>>>>>>>>>>>>haed in tests
This is why stats are so misleading. Babar is undergoing a period where his future is uncertain while head has consistently been improving as a batsmen year by year.

Head is in the class of Warner and gilly. The only issue he probably won't reach their numbers and impact because he had a late career resurgence and doesn't have a decade to get those achievements, but talent wise he's up their.

Babar is in the class of will young, tom Latham, Labu and others as odi batsmen. Still good batters but no where close to top tiers
 
despite being a better bat, head has amny technical flaws against the swinging.he keeps getting golden ducks every now and then.2 vs wi ,2 vs pak,1 vs nz
 
Thread topic says BABAR vs Travis Head clearly... No ashwin Anderson talks please
 
Travis Head is the kind of guy you'd need in a World Tournament final against India at the MCG/Lords.

Babar Azam is the kind of guy you'd need in a bilateral dead rubber against West Indies C in Karachi.


I hope that answers the question.
 
This is why stats are so misleading. Babar is undergoing a period where his future is uncertain while head has consistently been improving as a batsmen year by year.

Head is in the class of Warner and gilly. The only issue he probably won't reach their numbers and impact because he had a late career resurgence and doesn't have a decade to get those achievements, but talent wise he's up their.

Babar is in the class of will young, tom Latham, Labu and others as odi batsmen. Still good batters but no where close to top tiers
Babar has odi ave 50 vs NZ good bowlers.He had 35.5 ave in SENA while Head away records in test is not good
 
Babar has odi ave 50 vs NZ good bowlers.He had 35.5 ave in SENA while Head away records in test is not good
No one is denying that Babar isnt more consistent then Travis Head.

Head's biggest issue is that he gets out too quickly with the new ball. He's brilliant at punishing the old ball, and the moment the ball gets old it's game over for the opposition.

But he does struggle early on which is why aus makes him bat at 5 in tests.

But in odi and t20 he has to open since he plays at a very quick pace.

Babar is nowhere near Travis head as a batsmen. Australia would die a dog's death before they replace Head for Babar.

Bumrah and head both consider each other rivals and they both share a mutual respect for one another. Bumrah has zero respect for Babar since babar is beneath him and barring 2021 outlier, bumrah can easily get rid of bobby.
 
Everyone going goo goo gaa gaa, but noone wants to explain Heads below par away record as brother @RizwanT20Champ has pointed out

This needs proper conclusion based on facts not on fantasy. I believe in data, nothing else
You've been a good poster for a while and I garnered some respect for you, don't make me change my mind.

Only the size of a toothpick brain would put Babar or Rizwan >>> Travis Head.

Make a Travis vs Gilly vs Warner thread so we can actually have intellectual discussions on this forumn.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You've been a good poster for a while and I garnered some respect for you, don't make me change my mind.

Only the size of a toothpick brain would put Babar or Rizwan >>> Travis Head.

Make a Travis vs Gilly vs Warner thread so we can actually have intellectual discussions on this forumn.
I wasn’t aware of Head’s poor away record.

Again you are getting emotional here. Like I said I am a man of data.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I wasn’t aware of Head’s poor away record.

Again you are getting emotional here. Like I said I am a man of data.
It is a valid talking point - people will gloss over it because it is Head and not Babar. Imagine if Babar had 0 away centuries. Head has 0 away centuries in tests! That's a crazy stat. Why should he be held to a different standard?
 
Travis Head is the kind of guy you'd need in a World Tournament final against India at the MCG/Lords.

Babar Azam is the kind of guy you'd need in a bilateral dead rubber against West Indies C in Karachi.


I hope that answers the question.
Babar has more 2 test centuries away from home, Head has 0.
 
It is a valid talking point - people will gloss over it because it is Head and not Babar. Imagine if Babar had 0 away centuries. Head has 0 away centuries in tests! That's a crazy stat. Why should he be held to a different standard?
People respect Head because he dominates Ind unlike Babar.Besides Aus it is Ind who is the big dog in test and odi.Playing well against them could create a blindspot on people mind that Head is also good in other areas like away matches
 
Babar is a good ODI player.

I would pick him if we were chasing a 280ish target on tough pitch in ODI.

For most other scenarios I'd take Heady in ODI.

In test I'd take Babar but it's a sad indictment of Barbar decline that from being discussed alongside big 4 he is being discussed along Aussie HTB. I hope he doesn't fall further.

In T20 then Travis without a doubt.
 
In ODI Babar is better.Babar has scored 45 runs/innings vs Aus in Aus.While Head scored 38 runs/innings vs Ind in Ind
 
What sidekick? I’m asking you about the interpretation of records and stats and how they alter your thinking?
You need to start adding your own views to a discussion, rather than just simply liking or disliking what others have to say.
 
You need to start adding your own views to a discussion, rather than just simply liking or disliking what others have to say.
I do my part by correcting falsehood.

You casted a doubt on Travis Head because of his so called away record. So that’s why I am asking you to clarify. It means Head is an overrated player?
 
Babar is a good ODI player.

I would pick him if we were chasing a 280ish target on tough pitch in ODI.

For most other scenarios I'd take Heady in ODI.

In test I'd take Babar but it's a sad indictment of Barbar decline that from being discussed alongside big 4 he is being discussed along Aussie HTB. I hope he doesn't fall further.

In T20 then Travis without a doubt.
This is a good post and I can see your point of view even if I would take Babar over Head in ODIs on most pitches except ultra flat phattas. You see the bias here against Babar though? Head is revered when he scores on a phatta in MCG or Sydney but Babar will be castigated for not performing in seaming conditions vs Garner and McGrath on a green pitch in November. Head's 0 away centuries and poor away record is being overlooked and is called "so-called" as if it doesn't actually exist lol.
 
I do my part by correcting falsehood.

You casted a doubt on Travis Head because of his so called away record. So that’s why I am asking you to clarify. It means Head is an overrated player?
What is the falsehood? Head averages 32 away from Australia with 0 away centuries and 1 neutral century. When you don't have data you start badmouthing people or sidestepping the question.
 
Even in Pak where batting paradise exist Head ave is 22 in test
I am glad people are waking up to this regardless of where you stand on Babar vs Head. Head is a HTB of the highest order and until he corrects that and starts performing outside of his Australian pitches, he should not be rated. Imagine a Pakistani batsman with 9 centuries and 0 of them away from Pakistan. He would have been crucified by now.
 
People respect Head because he dominates Ind unlike Babar.Besides Aus it is Ind who is the big dog in test and odi.Playing well against them could create a blindspot on people mind that Head is also good in other areas like away matches
That's it, Head's rated on "perception" more than actual output. He is held to a different standard. It's ok if he is a HTB but other players must prove their greatness away from home...LOL!
 
I do my part by correcting falsehood.

You casted a doubt on Travis Head because of his so called away record. So that’s why I am asking you to clarify. It means Head is an overrated player?
Why does away record not matter to you.
 
Why does away record not matter to you.

When it comes to away tests, Travis has only played 3 tests in India, 2 tests in NZ, 3 in pakistan, 2 in sri lanka and 2 in uae.

That's a total of 12 away tests excluding England and hence the sample size is ridiculously small.

In England, he's played 10 tests where he's struck 4 half centuries and a century (wtc final) which automatically disproves the lie that this rubbish is spreading since Travis literally has a century overseas vs England.

And Travis has played 0 tests in sa atm.

Travis only has a poor record cause he's hardly played any overseas tests barring eng where is test record is good.

Compare that to Babar who has played 8 games in aus averaging 25. Babar has played more overseas tests in one country then Travis head has overall.

Even in England, Babar test avg is inflated since his high score is 69 with him scoring 3 50's in 4 test games and not doing a damn vs England where they mauled pakistan into next week.

Posters be advised: check howstats for your information next time.

These posters don't even know that Travis literally scored a wtc century in England.
 
Agendas are exposed. Babar is struggling at the moment but at least he still has away test centuries unlike HTB Head.
as i said previously Babar needs to score some daddy hundreds to regain his lost fanbase. But to ignore Head’s away record is mind boggling to say the least
 
as i said previously Babar needs to score some daddy hundreds to regain his lost fanbase. But to ignore Head’s away record is mind boggling to say the least
Yes Head's away record of playing 12 total tests in every country excluding England.

Just can't be ignored bro. Let's also delete his England test 100 so we can pretend he has 0 overseas test centuries.
 
as i said previously Babar needs to score some daddy hundreds to regain his lost fanbase. But to ignore Head’s away record is mind boggling to say the least
1735034558373.png

This HTB has played 41 innings outside of Aus with 1 century (which was a neutral 100, not even an away one lol).

In Australia he has only played 4 innings more. HTB of the highest order1735034612076.png
 
as i said previously Babar needs to score some daddy hundreds to regain his lost fanbase.
There is no lost fanbase for Babar.

Babar needs to hit a random cover drive and make some strange expressions with his face when the ball beats his bat. He gets the same amount of views and likes on Tiktok and Twitter for doing these things.
 
Thank you brother. Data doesn't lie.
Yes, but the 2 of you do. Zero overseas test centuries 🤣🤣🤣.

Now the new narrative is neutral, because apprantly England isn't a country for these rubbish posters
 
Haters will say you hacked cricinfo website and edited Head’s Overseas record :LOL:
But if you exclude all the countries other than Australia, he hasn't played any overseas tests ;) He has played 41 innings outside of Aus, and 45 in Aus but 41 innings is a small sample...agenda is clear.
 
Head is ahead in all formats. This is not even a comparison.

Head is match winner where Babar is stat padder.

Babar did not play any Match winning test knock in SENA countries so far and he has not done anything special Even at home apart from 190s, rest were stat padding knocks.
 
Head is ahead in all formats. This is not even a comparison.

Head is match winner where Babar is stat padder.

Babar did not play any Match winning test knock in SENA countries so far and he has not done anything special Even at home apart from 190s, rest were stat padding knocks.
And what has Head done in Asia? He has a grand total of 1 100 away from Australia in 41 innings and that was on a neutral venue on a flat track vs an Indian attack minus Bumrah lol..Head has not even managed to statpad outside of his beloved Aus pitches. HTB of the highest order. There is a debate to be had in T20Is and maybe even in ODIs (although Babar's body of work is much bigger) but in tests, Babar is ahead without question.
 
Head is ahead in all formats. This is not even a comparison.

Head is match winner where Babar is stat padder.

Babar did not play any Match winning test knock in SENA countries so far and he has not done anything special Even at home apart from 190s, rest were stat padding knocks.
But Head averages 32 away from home :ROFLMAO:
 
Incredible bias here - Babar apparently has no match winning SENA 100 - ok, but why does Head not even have a single century AWAY from home? Why only 1 outside of Australia? The bias and hate is unreal. Hoping Babar scores a ton in SA to further distance himself from HTB Head.
 
Incredible bias here - Babar apparently has no match winning SENA 100 - ok, but why does Head not even have a single century AWAY from home? Why only 1 outside of Australia? The bias and hate is unreal. Hoping Babar scores a ton in SA to further distance himself from HTB Head.
Hoping Babar scores a ton in SA to further distance himself from HTB Head.

Keep hoping
 
Some of the innings Head has played are immortal.

They are all from the brand of Achiles in Troy. If you are afraid to die, no one will remember your name!
 
But Head averages 32 away from home :ROFLMAO:
Head is vulnerable against spinners but I'll take head over Babar Azam in all formats .

As i Said head is match winner and on his days he can win the Match single handley against any team at anywhere but same can't be Said for Babar Azam .

Babar Azam has better stats than head still he hasn't won many matches for pakistan .

Head will fall more often than Babar Azam but still win more matches for Australia because of his impactful knocks .
 
Head is vulnerable against spinners but I'll take head over Babar Azam in all formats .

As i Said head is match winner and on his days he can win the Match single handley against any team at anywhere but same can't be Said for Babar Azam .

Babar Azam has better stats than head still he hasn't won many matches for pakistan .

Head will fall more often than Babar Azam but still win more matches for Australia because of his impactful knocks .
Buzzwords don't mean much, how many matches has Travis head won outside of his phattas in Aus? Why does he have only 1 100 in 41 innings away from Aus? Is he an immortal Tory match winner only in Sydney? It's incredible that apart from beating Shardul Thakur on a flat Oval pitch, he has no centuries outside of Australia. 1 century in 41 innings is shocking. I never realised he was that big of a FTB/HTB.
 
Some of the innings Head has played are immortal.

They are all from the brand of Achiles in Troy. If you are afraid to die, no one will remember your name!
Looks like Head gets very afraid when he faces bowlers in their own den.
 
This ends the debate I suppose

It’s stats like these where they belief festers that Babar Azam and Mohammad Rizwan are better players than Travis Head
Stop bringing Rizwan is every thread.

Nobody is questioning who is better and who is not. We are simply asking why is Head so poor overseas.
 
Buzzwords don't mean much, how many matches has Travis head won outside of his phattas in Aus? Why does he have only 1 100 in 41 innings away from Aus? Is he an immortal Tory match winner only in Sydney? It's incredible that apart from beating Shardul Thakur on a flat Oval pitch, he has no centuries outside of Australia. 1 century in 41 innings is shocking. I never realised he was that big of a FTB/HTB.
Head comparison is with stat paddler Babar Azam who is Even worse than him.

Im not saying head is best in the world .

Has Babar Played any match winning test knock outside subcontinent?
 
Head comparison is with stat paddler Babar Azam who is Even worse than him.

Im not saying head is best in the world .

Has Babar Played any match winning test knock outside subcontinent?
Has Travis Head played any match winning knock in Asia? Vs England in England? vs NZ in NZ? Why the double standards? If Head is so great why does he average 32 over a 41 innings sample size outside of Aus with 1 century (and even that was a neutral venue, not against a team in their den)? Those are tailender stats.
 
No need to put neutral there, away matches are played in oppositions home, neutral matches shouldn’t be included.

Head averaged 29 away from home.
Yes, hence why I said outside of Aus, purely away from home he doesn't even average 30. Shameful stats but apparently he is Tory or something.
 
Has Travis Head played any match winning knock in Asia? Vs England in England? vs NZ in NZ? Why the double standards? If Head is so great why does he average 32 over a 41 innings sample size outside of Aus with 1 century (and even that was a neutral venue, not against a team in their den)? Those are tailender stats.
Head WTC final knock>> babar Azam performance outside the subcontinent .

Both are Mediocre outside the home but head has one memorable knock which put him ahead of Babar Azam.
 
No need to put neutral there, away matches are played in oppositions home, neutral matches shouldn’t be included.

Head averaged 29 away from home.
1735037657682.png

I posted outside of Aus earlier where he averages 32. This is purely away from home meaning oppositions in their own den (so Anderson in England and not Shardul Thakur): Head averages 29.6 with ZERO 100s over 19 tests. Tailender stats.
 
Back
Top