Hasan123
Test Star
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2016
- Runs
- 38,432
Can't believe Joyce is 39!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hassan should have played ahead of Rahat.
Agreed, Hassan should have been playing. But I think Abbas also deserves to play. Should have been Hasan, Abbas, and Amir.
If anyone from these 3 has to be dropped that should be AmirAgreed, Hassan should have been playing. But I think Abbas also deserves to play. Should have been Hasan, Abbas, and Amir.
If anyone from these 3 has to be dropped that should be Amir
Missed a trick here by not playing Usman.
He has grown up playing on such kind of pitches and was the lone warrior for Lahore for quite some time.
I dont get the obsession with his low SR in domestic. Just watch the guy bat and where he has scored. Very good on off stump.
Hasan is the last person who should have been dropped. Wouldn't have minded either one of Amir or Rahat. Amir will be economical but won't take wickets due to no pitching the ball up. Rahat will be erratic, but will get some wickets off a few "magic" deliveries.
Pak will regret not playing Saad or Usman at 6. Would have been very handy runs on this track.
Pak will regret not playing Saad or Usman at 6. Would have been very handy runs on this track.
Everyone on bench is a champion
Azhar is really struggling. It's expected for a player of 33 + whatever, but the decline is too sharp for comfort. At this rate [MENTION=132916]Junaids[/MENTION] concern could be reality.
And that scoring![]()
Sadly there aren’t and I don’t believe Saad and Usman deserve to be in the XI straight away.Bas yehi kh dia karo jab jawab na ho.. So there are no batsmen in Pak who can play swing/seam?
We are talking about real players here who can cater movement and Usman is right up there.
This is where Pakistan will get away from us.
Kane, talented but raw.
Thompson, even domestically expensive
We should have gone with six specialist batsmen given how frail our batting is.
When your five batsmen consist of one 33 year old opener who's out of form, a debutant, someone with little Test match experience, an inconsistent Asad Shafiq and a player unproven in Tests in Babar Azam then you need all the help you can get.
Mickey likes his all rounders though.
We should have gone with six specialist batsmen given how frail our batting is.
When your five batsmen consist of one 33 year old opener who's out of form, a debutant, someone with little Test match experience, an inconsistent Asad Shafiq and a player unproven in Tests in Babar Azam then you need all the help you can get.
Mickey likes his all rounders though.
Sadly there aren’t and I don’t believe Saad and Usman deserve to be in the XI straight away.
I agree with structure of this XI which means Saad/Usman only come in when Babar fails in this match and probably next match too
I understand what Mickey is trying to build but it's too early for both Shadab and Faheem. They need time to establish as pure bats and we do not have that playing in the UK against pretty good opponents.
Let’s wait a few matches before reaching this conclusion. He can drop down if his lack of form persists
Babar will do well because there is no spinner.
I agree with this combination in absence of yasir
I don’t trust Shadab as a good enough test bowler yet and thus we need extra bowler
If he drops down, PAK'll drop down at a faster rate - only utility of batsman with literally ZERO shot making ability is to open and bat till tea, may be for a 50.
Say at 3 - he comes at 20/1 and he'll take PAK to lunch at 55/1 max; Jimmy & his partner will have a 40 minutes lunch break and, PAK might go to 1st drinks after lunch at 73/4.
If Azhar can't ensure an average of 100 balls per innings as opener, he has no utility in any for of the game. People talk about Hanif being slow, but that guy probably holds a record that no one ever'll break - his average partner per innings was close to 5, which means at average he had seen 4/5 batsmen getting out from other end. Take out the single digit scores, basically he carried the batting for a struggling team till the tail comes.
If he drops down, PAK'll drop down at a faster rate - only utility of batsman with literally ZERO shot making ability is to open and bat till tea, may be for a 50.
Say at 3 - he comes at 20/1 and he'll take PAK to lunch at 55/1 max; Jimmy & his partner will have a 40 minutes lunch break and, PAK might go to 1st drinks after lunch at 73/4.
If Azhar can't ensure an average of 100 balls per innings as opener, he has no utility in any for of the game. People talk about Hanif being slow, but that guy probably holds a record that no one ever'll break - his average partner per innings was close to 5, which means at average he had seen 4/5 batsmen getting out from other end. Take out the single digit scores, basically he carried the batting for a struggling team till the tail comes.
Sadly there aren’t and I don’t believe Saad and Usman deserve to be in the XI straight away.
I agree with structure of this XI which means Saad/Usman only come in when Babar fails in this match and probably next match too
I agree with this combination in absence of yasir
I don’t trust Shadab as a good enough test bowler yet and thus we need extra bowler
FZ isn’t looking like such a bad option at this point is he![]()
FZ isn’t looking like such a bad option at this point is he![]()
Azhar is really struggling. It's expected for a player of 33 + whatever, but the decline is too sharp for comfort. At this rate [MENTION=132916]Junaids[/MENTION] concern could be reality.
And that scoring![]()
That's true as well but then we could've chosen a specialist spinner instead of Shadab who could hold up an end. But its a tough situation as Mickey doesn't want too many debutants.
We play for less too test cricket as well. Not sure what Azhar will do.
Whats a good score here?
250 - 300 runs?
We play for less too test cricket as well. Not sure what Azhar will do.
Whats a good score here?
250 - 300 runs?
Ideally I agree his best utility as an opener and even if he fails he should keep opening till SOuth Africa series.
The thing though is that Pakistan aren’t spoilt for choices and Azhar can be afforded a chance to drop down and regain his form for a few games after SA series probably
And I believe he still would come good in a few games opening
Not talking about combination, rather than Usman's strengths.
Usman Salahuddin is with the team since WI series under Mickey and the guy is still sitting on sidelines. If he isnt good why are they selecting him?
You see Haris and Shafiq bat and you clearly see a big difference in their game against fast bowling. Shafiq is shaky already 2 boundaries on edges which could have been caught while Harry is calm, relax, leaving the ball well, catering movement beautifully and scoring at a decent rate too.
Even though Usman is not at same level like Harry but still much better than likes of Shafiq when it specifically comes to playing fast bowling.
We play for less too test cricket as well. Not sure what Azhar will do.
Whats a good score here?
250 - 300 runs?
Big credit goes to Sarfraz here who brought Haris straight into the odi side and test side even though he didn't play a single first class match in 3 years. Sarfraz on tv said we are missing a batsman like Haris Sohal.
Well done Sarfi baqi clueless lot sai to koi umeed nahi talent identification ki.
He is not going to play ODI/T20, neither Asad, Sami, Imam, Usman, Saad - take them to SAF a month earlier with PAK A team, during NZ ODI series and play 4/5 FC games against decent FC players. That's the only solution - otherwise Test matches might not reach 4th days, if SAF plays Styen, Vernon, Rabada & Ngidi on their typical wickets ...........
Shafiq has been a decent enough test cricketer with 11 hundreds and I don’t believe we can drop him as of yet specially after losing misbah and younus
Credit also goes to the coaches for quickly identifying he should bat at 3. He debuted at 6 but his game and ability against pace means he's better suited in the top order.
Ok even if we agree don't drop him now if you are going with 5 batsmen but Mickey has been with the team for more than 1 year now and could have easily played Usman in some of test matches against WI knowing there will be spots soon in the team after Misbah, Younis. Usman would have got much needed experience. Right now he is just scared trying Usman.
I like the guy but his tactics were weird at quite a few times.
They are gonna get white washed in SA anyway.
98 overs today - I would have targeted to get all-out in 90 overs (adjust scoring for that), and have a go to IRL openers of 6 overs this evening and another 2 hours with moisture and semi old ball tmro morning. Ideally, IRL would have loved to keep PAK on bat till lunch tmro and bat at 2.5 rate ..... (unless they get them all-out for 170 after tea today)
They are gonna get white washed in SA anyway. I think Azhar should be able to regain decent enough form before that as he will havevUAE series to regain confidence too
Ireland are playing for a draw. We bat all the way down to 9, Thompson over Young was due to his batting as his bowling isnt Test level.
We'd be happy if Pakistan made 400 by lunch or Tea tomorrow, then we aim to avoid a follow on and that should be the draw.
Losing 3-0 is one thing (PAK lost to AUS 3-0 in 1999 series, but it doesn't tell the full story - and they sacked Pybus for that to bring Javed!!!), but being outclassed & look inept is another - and that's for lack of proper preparation is stupidity.
Losing 3-0 is one thing (PAK lost to AUS 3-0 in 1999 series, but it doesn't tell the full story - and they sacked Pybus for that to bring Javed!!!), but being outclassed & look inept is another - and that's for lack of proper preparation is stupidity.
Lol that will happen. Even if young lot bats well we have serious bowling issues and won’t be able to win. Too many weak links to challenge South Africa or England awayThat wont happen.
The young lot is much better against fast bowling. They just need more time and experience.
Do you see Haris scoring good 50s atleast.And i am sure he is the only bat u enjoy watching in this whole snail pace batting line up.
Lol that will happen. Even if young lot bats well we have serious bowling issues and won’t be able to win. Too many weak links to challenge South Africa or England away
I think, PAK'll post big and once bowlers get tired (it's not surprisingly too aged Irish side), scoring rate 'll increase and PAK tail half should post quick scores.
That wont happen.
The young lot is much better against fast bowling. They just need more time and experience.
i am actually asking about Haris performance against england??can he do it against Anderson and Broad.>????
They are actually inferior against fast bowling - take out Misbah & YK, see apart from Azhar what young lot has done against fast bowling - and now Azhar is struggling. When you have Misbah & YK in their 40s as your premium batsmen against fast bowling...
By cricket logic, it's not possible for PAK young players to play fast bowling well - it can't happen from QeA style, when they play 60 overs FC innings on soggy wickets, where 120K pacers just need to keep it on business spot, for wicket to do the job ......
More than batting, I am afraid you'll see PAK pacers bowling absolute filth line-length on SAF wickets, because they don't need to work out batsmen to get FC wicket in buckets.
Which channel in uk (Sky tv) is showing the match ?
We will lose all five Tests in England and South Africa, this team is a joke. The only bright spot in batting is Haris and it remains to be seen if Babar will find his feet in Test cricket at number 5, which will probably be his permanent position for a while now.
The rest of the batting and the whole bowling unit is in shambles. We are about to enter our worst phase in Test cricket in a long time.
Should look to make hay this afternoon as this pitch flattens out. See out Murtagh and Rankin and cash in on the others.
Haris gone - big blow !