CricFan2012
First Class Star
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2012
- Runs
- 3,228
Ajmals downfall has started
I have to agree with you on that one
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Ajmals downfall has started
I'm guessing that your age is the numbers in your username added up?
it's true. he hasn't looked himself for a while now
What a stupid thread is this and I wonder why it is going on and on and on....
If a few innings is a while, I bet most of our team has never performed!it's true. he hasn't looked himself for a while now
I wonder the same thing, Bhuvi is nowhere near Juni! And this thread now has 15 pages.
Good idea. This is my last post here. At least for a while.And we should also stop posting here otherwise it will continue to increase its pages.
still any doubts? beekay struggling to take wickets even in nz and sa
Yaar they flat wicket's at least his economy is good
Yaar help me to find the OP of this thread the guy is creating new threads now to defend beekay
hint http://www.pakpassion.net/ppforum/showthread.php?t=195604
I chose the last three years. In those, among players who have bowled in 40 or more innings, Juni was 2nd. Ajmal topped the list with 19.71. JK is the best among fast bowlers though, closely followed by Johnson.IS JK averaging the best among bowlers in ODIs. ?? Can someone confirm this. Players who have played more than 40+ matches, in the past 2 years I mean
I chose the last three years. In those, among players who have bowled in 40 or more innings, Juni was 2nd. Ajmal topped the list with 19.71. JK is the best among fast bowlers though, closely followed by Johnson.
Here: http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/en...1;spanval2=span;template=results;type=bowling
I chose the last three years. In those, among players who have bowled in 40 or more innings, Juni was 2nd. Ajmal topped the list with 19.71. JK is the best among fast bowlers though, closely followed by Johnson.
Here: http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/en...1;spanval2=span;template=results;type=bowling
I chose the last three years. In those, among players who have bowled in 40 or more innings, Juni was 2nd. Ajmal topped the list with 19.71. JK is the best among fast bowlers though, closely followed by Johnson.
Here: http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/en...1;spanval2=span;template=results;type=bowling
Junaid vs McClaghan would a better contest!! Both beasts in ODIs
Junaid vs McClaghan would a better contest!! Both are beasts in ODIs
In a Pak NZ game, going at 6rpo like McClenaghan could very easily do could be the match breaker because I'd doubt the RRs would generally be as high as they would in the NZ India series.
Not saying JK couldn't be expensive either, just MM would be more likely to go for more runs more often.
Where is BK?
Junaid is better, no doubt about it. But I think junaid has started bowling 126-128k in test matches. It will be interesting to see if he was tired or he has lost pace..
Junaid is better, no doubt about it. But I think junaid has started bowling 126-128k in test matches. It will be interesting to see if he was tired or he has lost pace..
Junaid is better, no doubt about it. But I think junaid has started bowling 126-128k in test matches. It will be interesting to see if he was tired or he has lost pace..
He was constantly bowling in the 135 kph range and was no doubt restraining his pace so that he could get more overs in.
Kumar isn't picking wickets these days. His ER is fine but that alone doesn't mean much.
You need wickets up front.
Junaid is ahead now, but if I have both in my team in any format, I won't give Junaid the new ball.
even good ER is hard if you see the pitches.absolute roads.
however it'd be better to compare Junaid with Shami then BK.BK is not in same category
even good ER is hard if you see the pitches.absolute roads.
however it'd be better to compare Junaid with Shami then BK.BK is not in same category
That good economy is also helped by the fact that he never bowls at the death. Imgine him against Corey Anderson.
he has bowled in death in both ODIs here.
bowling at the death also gets wickets due to batsmen slogging.so it goes both ways
He's yet to bowl in 40 innings. 10 more to go.Where is BK?
MashaAllah he's really good, these stats made me so happy! No doubt he's certainly as good as Amir. Some people just never learn.Wow this was surreal man, never expected this from JK. And there are some people on PP who still doubt his talent
If he's best among the fast bowlers ATM then he is indeed very talented on par with amir I presume
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
InshaAllah.Wow Juni has some great stat's. Alway's said the kid's going to be a Pakistani great (In Shaa Allah).
How can you compare?ok so how many wickets for beekay now in nz and sa?
How can you compare?
Junaid played 7 ODI's in SA and 1 test.
Bhuv played 1 ODI in SA and no tests.
Bhuv played 4 ODI's in NZ and Junaid yet to play there.
You know which tournament they both played together? Champions trophy in England
Let me know if you want to know the stats of that tournament
How can you compare?
Junaid played 7 ODI's in SA and 1 test.
Bhuv played 1 ODI in SA and no tests.
Bhuv played 4 ODI's in NZ and Junaid yet to play there.
You know which tournament they both played together? Champions trophy in England
Let me know if you want to know the stats of that tournament
How can you compare?
Junaid played 7 ODI's in SA and 1 test.
Bhuv played 1 ODI in SA and no tests.
Bhuv played 4 ODI's in NZ and Junaid yet to play there.
You know which tournament they both played together? Champions trophy in England
Let me know if you want to know the stats of that tournament
Well Asia is both players home and In Asia BK avgs 48.07 with 14 wickets from 16 matches at an EC rate of 4.84 and a SR of 58 at the same time Junaid khan avgs 18.87 with 32 wickets in 14 matches!!.
In UAE and you know the flat tracks he faces over there especially during the srilankan tour of UAE he avgs 19.70 in 11 matches with 24 wickets.
I like BK but so far he has been a big disappointment
After CT he has avg 77.12 with a SR of 82 taking 8 wickets in 13 matches while junaid khan after CT has avg 18.81!!!! taking 33 wickets in 15 matches!!!!! A SR of 22!!
BK
http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/en...an;template=results;type=bowling;view=innings
JK
http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/en...an;template=results;type=bowling;view=innings
Although i dont like these sort of versus threads but i think this has put an END to this debate which is starting to look foolish now.
no problem mate sit in the memories of ct while this thread is a joke already
jk >>>>>>>> day light >>>>>>>>> beekay shami varun and all other current bowlers from india
beekay was pathetic in 1 odi thats why he was dropped in sa. And if you are talking about ct where they played together than keep in my mind that india vs pakistan odi series i dont need to provide those stats i guess
jk average is now 22.28 in odi while beekay is 35+ )
Such an irony isnt it mate, that you are the 1st one to bump it everytime even you know this is a Joke thread??
Everyone knows Junaid is a better bowler..but due to your trollish nature you bump it everytime and when people gives you back you claim it as a Joke thread
View attachment 42215
View attachment 42216
This.I suppose the OP made this thread when Beekay's stats were comparable but now Junaid has clearly proven himself to be a better bowler.
This.
Why it is so tough for people to understand that the OP was created when both the players were comparable. You will find many such weird threads in Pakpassion like "Inzy vs Sachin", "Dhoni vs K.Akmal," etc. They might have some relevance once upon a time but not today.
But bumping everytime when you yourself know who is the better bowler is bizzare.
On record - Junaid is way better bowler than BK and this is not even comparable.
This.
Why it is so tough for people to understand that the OP was created when both the players were comparable. You will find many such weird threads in Pakpassion like "Inzy vs Sachin", "Dhoni vs K.Akmal," etc. They might have some relevance once upon a time but not today.
But bumping everytime when you yourself know who is the better bowler is bizzare.
On record - Junaid is way better bowler than BK and this is not even comparable.
now is the time this thread is pretty much one sided. Not because junaid has been sensational, but because bhuvi is very much harmless now. Junaid has always been a much better bowler.
Now is the time this thread is pretty much one sided. Not because Junaid has been sensational, but because Bhuvi is very much harmless now. Junaid is easily a better bowler.
Another promising Indian bowler wasted. Looks like Shami is heading the same way. All others are pretty mediocre from the other side of the border.
One is a strike bowler you can go to and the other is nothing more than a support bowler.
I'll let you decide which is which.
I was referring to Junaid.
anddddddddddd you guys made this thread active again!
Ahem.
I was just going through this thread to have a laugh - I came across this.
I think I made myself clear,there.
My intention is not to mock anyone here.
yes i saw your post but thread is back on first page which means now hum mamoon ka dubara deedar kerenge is thread main giving us lecture on new ball swing
Why on God's earth would you have Bhuvneshwar Kumar in your team when people like Steyn, Johnson, Finn, Harris all bowl in LOs successfully?Junaid is bowling better these days.
Both are different bowlers with different strengths and weaknesses. I'd have them both in my ODI team that is for sure.
Why on God's earth would you have Bhuvneshwar Kumar in your team when people like Steyn, Johnson, Finn, Harris all bowl in LOs successfully?
This thread is about Junaid Khan and Bhuvenshwar Kumar. Not XYZ.
If I am asked to choose between the two in ODIs, I would take both.
If I had to pick one, I'd look around my other bowlers and see where my overall strength lies.
If my team has good new ball bowlers who can get conventional swing, I would take Junaid because he is a good death bowler and can put in a shift in the middle overs.
If my team had good death bowlers, I would take Bhuvneshwar Kumar because he gets the new ball to swing and is threatening and also in spite of the obvious lack of pace and energy, he doesn't get spanked in spite of bowling on some extremely unpleasant pitches.
This thread is about Junaid Khan and Bhuvenshwar Kumar. Not XYZ.
If my team has good new ball bowlers who can get conventional swing, I would take Junaid because he is a good death bowler and can put in a shift in the middle overs.
If my team had good death bowlers, I would take Bhuvneshwar Kumar because he gets the new ball to swing and is threatening and also in spite of the obvious lack of pace and energy, he doesn't get spanked in spite of bowling on some extremely unpleasant pitches.
Junaid is decent bowler but I don't understand why the hell many Pakistani Ppers are hyping him as he is the next coming of Akram or an ATG bowler.
When Fatshed was hyped so much I was the first person to mention he has been hyped up too much, he was said as the next coming of Saeed Anwar and look where he is now
Till scored his 12-14 centuries in ODIs most haters were telling him as the Srilanka bashers :
What about JK ???? doesn't same applies to him also now ??? Check his wicket tally against Mighty Srilankans
JK is decent bowler and I hope he doesn't disappear like Jam-shed after all hypes around.
Another tournament exposed Junaid again??
Junaid
Matches - 3
Wickets - 0
E.R - 5.50
Bhuv
Matches - 4
Wickets - 3
E.R - 4.72
Hope ATG juiand fires in the final.
What death bowling? Check the economy rate of both.I hope you enjoyed the death bowling of both bowlers and if 3 matches can expose players than whole indian batting line exposed and Pakistan the weak batting line did much better