Mamoon
ATG
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2012
- Runs
- 104,481
- Post of the Week
- 12
If Imad opens or bats at 3, his stats will not be comparable to Babar’s because Babar is a specialist top order batsman and Imad is at best a decent number 5/6, nothing more than that.Imad wasim is a better odi batsmen then babar 100%, let's have their side by side team stat war right now.
How is an avg of 42 and sr of 110 batting at no 7 worse then an avg if 56 which was originally 60 but dropped by 4 points due to a trash 2023 wc and a sr of 88 at No 3 better?
How is an average of 33 against India better then an average of 71 against India that imad has? Go on I'll wait.
If you are saying that Imad has better stats than Babar then you are essentially saying that Imad is a better ODI batsman than 99% of the ODI number 3s in history, so is Imad in the 1% greatest ODI batsmen?
Also, performances vs one particular team means nothing. There is no doubt that Babar has been poor vs India, but these outliers will always be there.
Imad has been a disaster with the ball vs India, he has 0 wickets. Does that make him worse than all the bowlers in history who have picked up wickets vs India?
Also, you argument that 11 Imads would beat 11 Babar is hilarious. This applies to every specialist batsman/bowler and all-rounder.
11 Shadab Khans would beat 11 Glenn Mcgraths.
11 Mohammad Hafeez would beat 11 Dale Steyns.
We can go on and on and on with this.
When you are comparing batsmen or bowlers with all-rounders, you have to look at who is better in his role.
If you don’t, then you are essentially saying that every half-decent all-rounder is a better cricketer and more useful than every great batsman/bowler which is simply not true and you know it.
Babar the batsman is clearly superior than Imad the all-rounder and this is not something that is up for debate and even the most hardcore Imad fans won’t go down that road.