CrIc_Mystique
First Class Captain
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2019
- Runs
- 4,206
Bhai...as an indian supporter and looking at how its swinging. 200 + will be a big effort....If this 2 fires, it will over 300 runs.
pak pace attack has been awesome so far...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bhai...as an indian supporter and looking at how its swinging. 200 + will be a big effort....If this 2 fires, it will over 300 runs.
Get afridi back on pleaseit did, cause the ball was just kissing the bat. it was very very close in the slow mo. A few mm off
if you use agridi now, than who bowls from 35th over onward?Get afridi back on please
Rizi wasn't confident here. They took the review on sheer optimism.if you have played club cricket, you would know only keeper, slip and bowler can guide you. Captain standing at mid has no proper sight of things.
India’s game for the taking? lol chill outSpinners bowling from both ends now.. its Indias game for the taking now
it did, cause the ball was just kissing the bat. it was very very close in the slow mo. A few
Not to me. He was standing so close to the wicket. I did not see bat either hitting the ground or pad/shoe to even think about an edge. How could one not hear if can't see?it did, cause the ball was just kissing the bat. it was very very close in the slow mo. A few mm off
But if he gets a wicket. Or 2 then does it matter who bowls from 35th onwards?if you use agridi now, than who bowls from 35th over onward?
Amongst the top 15 averaging spinners since the 2019 World Cup to have taken a min of 20 wickets - there is only one Pakistani.Superb bowling by Shaheen, Naseem and Rauf and while I know I'm repeating this time and again, but this is exactly why Pakistan needs an attacking spinner to build on the good work done by the fast bowlers.
Shadab is more of an all rounder for me who can work in a supporting role as a bowler. Abrar for Nawaz could be a good option, although it will weaken the batting a bit, it is a gamble worth taking.
wait, you thought they would had dropped shadab khan for a pacer?If you're not going to play Faheem or Wasim as 4th seamer on these pitches then they have no role in this side.
What was the need to announce the XI so quickly? Shadab is now leaking runs and bringing India back into the game.
It’s situational right. All 4 wickets fell to pace, and you have a chance to kill the innings right here. 1 or 2 more wickets to Shaheen, and India is staring down a collapse. That option won’t be true if a partnership develops for another 10-15 overs.dumb commetary. You cant just bring in pace, you need to use spinners somewhere. Only 3 overs of spin bowled and everyone is already whining, atleast lets see the positon after 10 overs of spin
is he even in pak squad? i thot he was awesome against eng in the test series...Abrar needed
He ain't, but he deserves to be, usama mir shpuld be out abrar in, abrar is ironically a better bat them usama as well.is he even in pak squad? i thot he was awesome against eng in the test series...
wicket not guaranteed.But if he gets a wicket. Or 2 then does it matter who bowls from 35th onwards?
Pak need a genuine wicket taking spinner. Opportunity to test Abrab and Usama was missedwait, you thought they would had dropped shadab khan for a pacer?
Even if Pakistan annunced the line up at toss, they were going to play two spinners. Nawaz hasnt bowled that bad that we start critisizing the decision.
If a 4th pacer was bought in, it would had been in place of Nawaz not Shadab.
Pakistan is not chasing anything above 200 here, the ball will swing quite a bit.Abdur Razzaq on Geo news saying once the lights come into play in the 2nd innings it will be a different game with the ball swinging more. Predicts anything above 200-225 will be challenging to chase.
No it would have been for Nawaz. I know he is bowling well but that isn't really the point. The point is that the 4th seamer would have utilised these conditions better.wait, you thought they would had dropped shadab khan for a pacer?
Even if Pakistan annunced the line up at toss, they were going to play two spinners. Nawaz hasnt bowled that bad that we start critisizing the decision.
If a 4th pacer was bought in, it would had been in place of Nawaz not Shadab.
We all know that. That’s why aggressive decision making has an element or risk, or everyone would do it rightwicket not guaranteed.
waseem jr isnt that special. had it been ihsanullah than yes.No it would have been for Nawaz. I know he is bowling well but that isn't really the point. The point is that the 4th seamer would have utilised these conditions better.
doesnt mean you make rash decisions for the sake of aggresivness. Pakistan has to be sane and think about the death overs.We all know that. That’s why aggressive decision making has an element or risk, or everyone would do it right
No Zaman Khan is needed lol. Not zero line and length ihsanullah . If ihsanullah learns line and length then he'll be > Shaheen due to 150kph pace.waseem jr isnt that special. had it been ihsanullah than yes.
Lack of a 4th seamer cost us at the MCG vs IND and it may cost us again today.If you're not going to play Faheem or Wasim as 4th seamer on these pitches then they have no role in this side.
What was the need to announce the XI so quickly? Shadab is now leaking runs and bringing India back into the game.
That's misbah level thinking. End the game here otherwise kishan will get that 300.doesnt mean you make rash decisions for the sake of aggresivness. Pakistan has to be sane and think about the death overs.
Abrar is one trick pony. Imad is better.Abrar needed
not guaranteed. 50 overs need to be bowled if it doesnt rain, and spinners will have to be adjusted somewhere.It’s situational right. All 4 wickets fell to pace, and you have a chance to kill the innings right here. 1 or 2 more wickets to Shaheen, and India is staring down a collapse. That option won’t be true if a partnership develops for another 10-15 overs.
There is a difference between rash and calculated aggression.doesnt mean you make rash decisions for the sake of aggresivness. Pakistan has to be sane and think about the death overs.
We did play Usama for 2 matches on the same SL tracks. He didn't impress.Pak need a genuine wicket taking spinner. Opportunity to test Abrab and Usama was missed
Rather a dump comment here. You can bring a fast bowler for only 1-2 overs to change up things. India are cruisig and you have given away the early advantage by making it easier for the batsmen to settle.dumb commetary. You cant just bring in pace, you need to use spinners somewhere. Only 3 overs of spin bowled and everyone is already whining, atleast lets see the positon after 10 overs of spin
Lol no, Imad is a one trick pony lol, Abrar is a mystery spinner.Abrar is one trick pony. Imad is better.
That is becauce he loves 'mazaydaar' bowlers like Shadab and NawazHardik always play good against us with both bat and ball and still we don't have any answer.
They don't look like taking a wicket Major. Haven't seen even a half chance.spinners are bowling well, not giving extras. Bowling at good lines, shadab bowled one bad over
In sha AllahLet India score what they can…We will chase it down. Mark my words
cant blame them, cause the pitch is wet, ball aint gripping aswell.They don't look like taking a wicket Major. Haven't seen even a half chance.
This is the template now for Pakistan's opponents at World Cup - just block out the pacers upfront and go after the spinners.
Middle overs is a real weakness both with bat and ball.
if dew comes in, it will be harder for the spinners of the side bowling second...I don't know how easy/difficult it is today to grip a ball due to the wet field. It especially is tougher to bowl spin if one can't grip. I would be easy on Shadab
bhai, agli team is India, not some mohallah ka team.66-4 should have been converted into 101-7 by keeping the pressure on but no here they are going to get a mammoth partnership without taking any risks. Shame