Dr_Bassim
Senior T20I Player
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2009
- Runs
- 18,854
- Post of the Week
- 8
Unless Sharma does something ballistic i would question his innings after 110 runs.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Our death batting is a joke. Pathetic.
Need someone to do a mini Pranav Dhanawade.
How much India can make in last 5 overs??
Selfish play from the indian batsmen.They are rightly being flayed by Ch9 commies.
As I expected (posted in the warm up thread as well) our lower middle order is too weak for modern standards of LO cricket. We are in for yet another below par score after a pretty good top order work.
Even getting close to the score of 300 will be a big achievement from hereon.
Thats why Aussies are the No.1 team. If they can't get wickets, they'll stifle you. Great death bowling despite that 6 by Dhoni just now
LOL what?
The top order is a bunch of selfish clowns who won't even let these guys bat, but the fault lies with the one who did not even get a chance rather than the ones who wasted balls?
300-310 is nothing against a team with Australia's batting strength.
Harsha Bhogle was saying that Dhoni used his time off to hit the gym. He wanted to build his muscle mass to pack more power into his shots. Looks like it's paying for now.
No you won't, all the Aussies need to is one batsmen to anchor while the others can go about scoring quickly. The aussies don't rely on one or two batsmen scoring big, they rely on one batsmen scoring 60-70+ while the others score quick 30s.We would win if we get to 300 though.
300-310 isn't enough against this Aus side, they bat too deep.
I would think our top order batters played that long for that score mainly because of knowing how weak our lower middle order is in terms of hitting power(over the last 2 years).
Needed Raina here, why the h was he dropped?
Needed Raina here, why the h was he dropped?
Am i the only one who thinks India could have played a bit faster and been 330-8 instead of 300-4?
Am i the only one who thinks India could have played a bit faster and been 330-8 instead of 300-4?
india should have gotten at least 320
Am i the only one who thinks India could have played a bit faster and been 330-8 instead of 300-4?
If India had Shami, I would back us to win. But his absence makes this 60-40 In Australia's favor.![]()
309 is ridiculous this should had been 340ish India needs to work on it LOI game.
309 is ridiculous this should had been 340ish India needs to work on it LOI game.
309 is ridiculous this should had been 340ish India needs to work on it LOI game.
Don't think he has performed that well against Aussies.
Well even if we lose this one atleast Rohits average is now at 41![]()