cricketworm
ODI Debutant
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2011
- Runs
- 11,519
- Post of the Week
- 1
This is not a cricket computer game...
I know, was standing very close because of lack of bounce that's why, but still was at catching height.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is not a cricket computer game...
Match is well poised. Don't think SA is ahead. Morning session would be crucial for both teams. Great comeback from SA though.. and poor captaincy from Strauss. Why would you bowl swann more than bresnan with new ball? Botham rightly ripped through Strauss's captaincy.
Personally, I think it was good decision by Strauss seeing amount of dust that was coming off when they were cleaning pitch.
Swann will play very big part if England is to win this test.
I think it was a bad decision because:
1) He brought swann very early as if he was bowling on subcontinent pitches. If you're not going to use the new ball in England then where would you?
2)My biggest beef.. he didn't attack when he brought Swann. Fielders were patrolling the boundary which makes no sense.. He needed to attack not defend.
Agreed Swann has a big role to play.
Well that's not how things roll. One bowler bowls a longer spell and you change the bowler from the other end.. this way your pace bowlers bowl more overs with the new ball. Swann should have came around 17th 18th over but he was bowling the 13th over of the innings. Plus what's the use of introducing a spinner when you're not even going to attack? Even mid-on and mid-off fielders were deep and batsmen were fetching easy singles.
I am not sure field was defensive that much. May be I must have been sleeping ... I watched on mute. Swann gave only 12 runs btw. with 5 maidens.
Well that's not how things roll. One bowler bowls a longer spell and you change the bowler from the other end.. this way your pace bowlers bowl more overs with the new ball. Swann should have came around 17th 18th over but he was bowling the 13th over of the innings. Plus what's the use of introducing a spinner when you're not even going to attack? Even mid-on and mid-off fielders were deep and batsmen were fetching easy singles.
They need to up the scoring rate. Need a lead by stumps.
Smith holds the bat with a very tight bottom-handed grip which 'chokes' the blade, turning it inwards so the face of the bat is closed towards the legside. He is inclined is to hit everything to leg, balls on off stump tend to go through square leg. England bowlers should go round the wicket, angle the ball in and try and move it away and catch the edge.
Ok. And what if the ball does'nt move away? A boundry towards the square leg![]()
BBC Test Match Special's Michael Vaughan
"If England knew beforehand what they know now about how this pitch has played, would they have gone in with two spinners? I wonder if England have asked for slow, turning wickets throughout the series. It's hindsight; I certainly wouldn't have played two spinners if I had to chose on the first morning."
This is looking a bit pitiful isn't it.