Robert
Test Star
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2007
- Runs
- 37,604
- Post of the Week
- 1
Broad concedes 10 runs in 1st over after lunch .
And the thread is back on the rails!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Broad concedes 10 runs in 1st over after lunch .
And the thread is back on the rails!
aussies do rate kumble though, certainly over swann anyway (i'm literally going to pm all the aussie posters and ask them).
English, Saffers, Lankans and Aussies don't rate Kumble because he didn't do much in their countries. Average 37 abroad overall. He was another example of an Indian home-track bully.
Swann on the other hand averages 28 home and away. The only place he hasn't delivered yet is Australia, which is traditionally a graveyard for offies.
bawwwww cry more.
swann is one ugly mofo and i'll say that if i want.
lol you're the one crying here like a baby to show your side of the argument because no one is listening to your BS.
Get out of your hole, the world has moved on. Nobody cares how other people looks.
Personally, I think Swann is a better spin bowler than Kumble.
it's the sheer number of wickets in comparison to swann, at a similar average, that makes him greater. he's just far closer to a legend than swann ever will be, a far greater sportsman.
i browse tennis forums a lot at when it comes to discussing greatness of tennis players the total number of grand slams means an awful lot, perhaps more than anything. longevity and thus legacy, or impact, means a lot. as should number of runs or wickets in cricket. and when it's this many more. well.....
aussies do rate kumble though, certainly over swann anyway (i'm literally going to pm all the aussie posters and ask them). saffers havn't got a clue about spin bowlers so i don't care what they think. although even herath has probably done better against SA than swann. and kumble didn't do that badly in england.
but it just doesn't matter that much! exact whereabouts of success or victory isn't always that important. going back to tennis, federer never beat nadal at wimbledon, and nadal won wimbedledon twice. but federer is far greater than nadal because he has a far higher number of grand slams. it counts!
certainly not a greater one. swann is no greater than herath.
what a joke Herath averages 40 outside Sri Lanka
again i refuse to accept failure or mediocrity.
Because on that logic an average of 35 for a batsman in South Africa would be acceptable. Which should not be the case at all internationally.
Only two batsmen who have played 12 innings in SA average 50, and maybe 8 average 40+ (i dont have stats now) but i'm sure its not more than 10. Of those 8 i think half average 45+.
Now the sample is large enough, on your logic we would have to adjust expectations to 35. That unacceptable.
bleh, again, cricket fans are too obsessed with this. i don't really care, he hasn't toured outside sri lanka much, and i remember he took a decent number of wickets in Aus and SA last time he was there, and he's been improving. and i'm joking slightly anyway, swann probably is a bit greater than herath, but not by much atm, as the stats show.
this isn't the argument.
If you are a top order batsman and you average 35, that is bad because tail enders don't contribute much. If your team's top order batsmen average 35, your team is unlikely to get even 250 while batting, that is why it is bad. But 35 would be a good average for a no 7 or no 8 batsman.
A spinner on pace friendly tracks is more like a tail ender batsman and certainly 35 would be a good average for him! And a spinner will do better on such wickets only if pressure is kept up by the pacers, and Indian spinners do not have much luxury in this department.
An average of 40 is poor whatever spin you want to put in. (no pun intended)
(to you too this discussion is over)
Its a pity England dont have a good keeper though. Swann should have 5 already.
I know people are quick to say how comfortable these two look, but there's always going to be a partnership at some point. In these conditions a wicket is always just around the corner.
Ifs and buts are part of the game man. He still has plenty of time and wickets to knock off. I think he will get there in this test.
you refer to the turn available ?
That stumping has really messed things up . except Swann , no one looks like getting a wicket .
Yeah. Uneven bounce for the seamers too.
Saw 2 from bressie which reared up . Still disappointed Cook wasted 6 overs of grey overcast skies today . A great skipper has to be ruthless .
First innings is hurting Aussies.
First goal, bat till tea. Next goal, bat till stumps. Don't think further than that.
I change over to Pak vs WI for a minute and Clarke decides to depart.
he is an overrated flat track bully
Well they need him. They don't have even FTBs who can last on wickets. Besides what's wrong in being an FTB not that I think Clarke is one? It's treated like a stigma here.