Junaid Khan has way more potential. The very fact that he's a left hander who can bring the ball in gives him the edge, but he's faster and is a seam (more than swing) bowler which means that he'll be more successful in Tests, where he already has three 5fers against SL, incl. two
in Sri Lanka.
Bhuvneshwar Kumar is pretty good too, but his lack of pace will not work in Tests even if he'll always get early breakthroughs with the new ball (independent of the conditions) in the shorter formats (he's also good at the death, which is a massive difference with Praveen Kumar.)
I think that, statistically, Bhuvi will be more Agarkar than Kapil Dev/Srinath for India (one of their best in ODIs, but "respectable" at best in Tests.)
11 3 26 0 2.36 is his figure in this innings when his team really want him to get wickets. overall 44 overs 100 runs and 4 wickets. averaging 25 in this match. This is against the worst batting lineup. like I said in my prev post, please give me the thing that you are smoking.
Have you actually seen his spell ? He's better than what you suggest, and 8 wickets @ 23 isn't bad, even Somalia 2nd XI would be there to
play a match and not eat samosas then kindly gift their wickets away for Juni to inflate his average (which stands at 27 as of now, in case...), let's be serious, you can't expect him to take a 12fer at an average which rivals a frog's IQ, batsmen of any side are here to - well - bat.
The legendary Kapil Dev took 4 wickets in 2 matches @ average of 33 and SR of 106 (lol) against Zimbabwe, let the series finish to see how Juni ends up.
