Junaid averages around 6-9 points less than BK in both ODIs and tests, cannot bowl during the death or when the ball is old and is a whole lot slower than Khan.
^That is a whole lot between the two and only a clearly biased person would pick BK over JK.
Kumar has averaged consistently lower than Junaid at a better economy rate throughout his career so far until the ODI series vs Australia where he was still the most economical pacer comfortably.
These 7 watches were nothing less than hell for the bowlers and you pick any Pakistani seamer, he will get hammered here.
Junaid is prone to getting a whack here and there, as proven in one of the games in WI and Zimbabwe and its absurd to think that he'd done a good job on those wickets.
Secondly, these pitches were nothing like the ones in the Pakistan series last Dec/Jan.
In spite of this 7 ODI series, Kumar still has a better economy rate rate than Junaid Khan.
What Junaid Khan has over Kumar is his strike rate which is very, very good.
Like I said, there isn't daylight between them and only boils down to whether you want a bowler who is good with the new ball or with the old ball.
Junaid gets no purchase with the new ball from any wicket, apart from that one off first ODI in India. He is quite good with the old ball and has good control and a nice yorker.
Kumar on the other hand is very lively with the new ball on most surfaces, but doesn't pose a threat with the old ball.
As far as ODIs go, I prefer a bowler who is good with the new ball but in Tests, its the old ball bowlers who I feel are more valuable because they can bowl long spells and a be threat all day long.
The irony of you calling me biased. Ha.
for Tests and 
in T20s".
