Amjid Javed
PakPassion's 100,000 posts man
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2004
- Runs
- 117,331
- Post of the Week
- 8
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
You need to work on your attempting trolling, take some pointers from mamoon if you are unsure.
I can't speak for Arteta but two hands on the back of Gabriel was a clear foul...The VAR had no clear obvious mistake to overrule. Please understand how VAR works. The Ref waiting for 4 mins could have asked to see the replays but didnt.
But please explain why Arteta a few weeks ago was fully supportive of VAR, officials after the huge offside mistake at Spurs but now is angry when this isnt even clear?
It's down to the VAR referee to refer incidents to the wait referee, not the other way round. At least get it rightThe VAR had no clear obvious mistake to overrule. Please understand how VAR works. The Ref waiting for 4 mins could have asked to see the replays but didnt.
But please explain why Arteta a few weeks ago was fully supportive of VAR, officials after the huge offside mistake at Spurs but now is angry when this isnt even clear?
Wow finally some reality and honesty, well done.It's now November and I did say several months ago that I would reserve judgment until the transfer window closes and a couple of months into the season...
That time is now.
Timber was a brilliant purchase, I always rated him from the few videos I'd seen of him.... a great Pitty he got injured..
Rice is also a brilliant purchase.
He will be club captain before the start of next season. No more needs to be said about this man.
He is a massive upgrade on Xhaka.
Havitz, what a disaster he's been so poorly and history tells you that it's unlikely he will do any better.
Saturday was the absolute final straw for me. That reckless tackle could have seen him sent off...
He played with more purpose and I suspect this was because he knows everyone is on his back and hopefully the coaching staff too... thie misguided "purpose" probably lead him to make that tackle....
anyway so far he has offered nothing and could go down as one of the worst buys in the history of the club.
I hope I'm wrong but so far it doesn't look that way.
When Odeguard, Partey and ESR are fit no way should Havitz be getting into the line-up..
In fact on Saturday, I was hoping against hope that Arteta took him off and replaced him with Zhivchenko with Tomiyasu playing left back...
Zhivchenko, minus thr left back duties, would be better in midfield then Havitz...
Arteta...
What he's doing to Ramsdale is inexplicable... so is his support for Havitz. The fact that he hasn't strengthened the strikers position is also a big blotch against his name.
Pleating Saka in every game is also a poor decision. He has literally run him to the ground.
Arteta has made some poor decisions and unless he improves his decision making the fans will eventually start to turn on him.
We need Ivan Toney but my fear is that Chelsea need him too and we simply cannot get into a bidding war against them in January...
Until that window, please Traussard upto front and let Nketiah come on as sub...
That's my it from me for now.
Wow finally some reality and honesty, well done.
Arsenal's next 4 game Burnley, Brentford, wolves, Luton. Arsenal need 12 points from 12 before some very tough game in Dec vs villa, brighton and Liverpool
I can't speak for Arteta but two hands on the back of Gabriel was a clear foul...
the fact that people say he was crouching down to head the ball backwards becomes slightly irrelevant when that same player is lying flat on his face... also the speed at which he falls tells you that it was clearly from a push...
The hands also on his back could arguable have prevented him from getting his head on the ball.
For me it was a foul whether Gabriel protested or not. Remember it was Gabriel's inability to clear the ball in the first place that resulted in this situation so he could conceivably have been angry at himself for getting us to that situation in the first place.
It's down to the VAR referee to refer incidents to the wait referee, not the other way round. At least get it right
In regards to your 2nd point, yes Arteta was being a hypocrite and I condem that. After the Liverpool incident, every PL manager / club should have come out and taken a stand against PGMOL and got then to fix things.
The difference between me and anyone else on here. I'm consistent with my views and I dont sugar coat things.
Even when Arsenal have got decisions go their way I've said they were lucky.
I said during palace game the penalty decision we got was soft and didn't look a penalty. I even said the United offside goal which was offside only just was lucky as well.
The standard of PL refereeing is incompetent at best.
Where Arteta has been wrong il call him out
It looks a foul in slow mo or with a still 2D image but in real time it didnt seem the attacker was actually pushing him down but I agree its arguable.
The problem is when the ref says no, it has to be very obvious for any change.
I just think Arsenal have themselves to blame, they played an avg game. Draw would have been fair imo.
I want Arsenal to win every cup they enter. Reality is that they aren't under this manager, the club's mentality is weak. If it was strong they wudnt have thrown away 16 cups since winning the FA Cup.No mate.
I said I would give it time and I did.
The difference between us is that, It's still not over for Arteta, and as an Arsenal fan I hope he succeeds...how long will he get? That's upto the board and he's clearly been given a long rope... so the reality is that either you hope for success or continue to post negative threads after threads
At the very least the red should have been asked to view it on the monitor.
I agree we were extremely poor in the attacking third but we at least kept possession and looked solid in defence for most parts...
A draw would have been the right result but as we know, two points could be. Racial in the end... whether it's for the title or a top four finish.
It also takes away our momentum and unbeaten record...
Not to mention all my spurs friends who are currently having a field day..
Come on Chelsea
Babar's captaincy isn't good enough.I want Arsenal to win every cup they enter. Reality is that they aren't under this manager, the club's mentality is weak. If it was strong they wudnt have thrown away 16 cups since winning the FA Cup.
The last 3 seasons EL semi final, top 4 and title collapse were down to Artetas inability to rotate and manage a squad at pressure end of the season.
This season he's already against struggling with squad rotation thats why the performances are in different.
In your post you've brought up the keeper issue, haverz issue. All things I mentored ages ago.
Yet when I mentioned it I'm being negative.
reality has finally sunk in. Everything I said about squad depth, managers short comings etc.. now people are agreeing upon
Having followed Arsenal since 1987, you get a feeling through experience when your team has the ability to get over the line and not.
Nothing to do with negativity just reality.
Boy oh boy
Chelsea
Have a look at Spurs vs Chelsea gameThe ref has communication, if the VAR is taking 4 mins, the ref can discuss the reasons why and he has the right to decided to check the monitor if he so wishes. Its rare but they have the right.
I agree the standard of refs and VAR in the PL is very poor. You have overweight, slow old refs who cant even keep with the play. Howard Webb should be fired, he has been enjoying the limelight instead of working hard to ensure the officials are competent.
Have a look at Spurs vs Chelsea game
2 clear red cards not given. Just more incompetent refereeing
The inconsistency is what passes fans off. Its clear these referees are just making things up as they go a long
The refs audio should also be heard live like in cricket and rugby but these corrupt Referees won't allow itNot watching it but will catch up with the highlights later.
VAR should be in the stadium like DRS , NBA , Rugby assistants. The problem with football is there are many instances which are opinions. ie how harsh the tackle was, the force used, etc but offsides should be clear.
This is the bit that I take issue with, saying they are corrupt, that's just nonsenseThe refs audio should also be heard live like in cricket and rugby but these corrupt Referees won't allow it
Wow if you think there is no corruption when it comes to refereeingThis is the bit that I take issue with, saying they are corrupt, that's just nonsense
I agree referee standards aren't great but not being good at something doesn't make you corrupt
Also, I don't think managers/players/fans help, they lay into referees selectively (this applies to all clubs and most managers) and all that does is amplify the pressure on officials
I mean, the Arteta rant over a legitimate goal (or let's argue it was 50/50), certainly not a howler and he loses the plot.
If he complained about the Bruno challenge he would have every right but he knew if he spoke about that then he'd have to address the Havertz challenge and that obviously didn't suit his narrative.
You don’t have a club what corruption is. Spot embarrassing yourself.Wow you are really niave if you think there is no corruption when it comes to refereeing
Last season we saw a clear hair pull and foul by spurs player in Chelsea game. VAR ignored the foul. Mike Dean said he didn't want to put his mate Anthony Taylor in tough spot
So if you are ignoring incidents on purpose that's not officiating game with integrity
Same as this season Howard Webb came out said Michael Oliver didn't send off Kovacic vs Arsensl as didn't want to spoil a big game. Again means that game isn't being officiated with integrity.
So referees in doing so are effecting outcomes of games by ignore incidents or making rules up for different games.
That is corruption. Just remember it's not always about the end result of match. It's about officials not doing things with integrity.
We've heard numerous times incidents haven't been referred to on field referees to look at screens etc.. because VAR refs don't want to make their mates look bad with initial decisions made. Again that's compromising the integrity of the game which is effectively corruption.
Yet your stuck on this continual point on Arteta moaning because your irriated at fact no one is giving Newcastle credit for a 1-0 win in a game neither side did enough to win.
only one embarrassing themselves is you .You don’t have a club what corruption is. Spot embarrassing yourself.
Corruption would be the referees showing bias to a particular club because they are on their payroll. Corruption is what happened in Italian football with Juventus buying referees.
The English referees are incompetent and they lack consistency in the interpretation and application of rules. There is not a shred of evidence that they are corrupt.
All clubs suffer and benefit from VAR shockers. It is not a pattern - it depends on your luck. If it was Arsenal instead of Newcastle the goal would have still stood.
Every week someone will suffer at the hands of VAR. It is a collective issue that needs to be addressed in unison. It is not about certain individual clubs and referees.
Oh my, you really are clueless beyond hope aren’t youonly one embarrassing themselves is you .
No one takes your sill theories seriously. "Your genetics post" on the cricket forum is proof of that.
The fact referees are picking and choosing to officiate games and instances in different ways means they are influencing games and that's an integrity issue.
Yet a other who Is niave enough to think their is no corruption going on.
It's also clear these referees enjoy creating drama from a specitcal point of view.
The that you are, your merely using VAR excuse to deflect from Another poor Arsenal performance and fraudeta being out of his depth.
Still waiting for list of 40 G/A wingers better then Martinelli
Still waiting for proof nketitah is best back up striker
Still waiting for you excuse on havertz and Jorginho running around like headless chicken
Stop being a coward and back up your pathetic claims, otherwise keep quite and stop embarrassing urself
Oh my, you really are clueless beyond hope aren’t you
Again - corruption in the context of football refs would be giving decisions in favor of a particular club or set of clubs because they are on their payroll.
This is what happened in Italy. What happening in England is just pure incompetence.
You clearly don’t understand the difference between being incompetent and being corrupt.
If you think the PGMOL is corrupt, please provide evidence that they are on the payroll of XYZ clubs and hence involved in corrupt decisions.
Running like a coward still waiting for response on martinelli, nketitah and havertz.@Amjid Javed
More nonsense.
The only person who is doing a runner is you. From this corruption to there are different types of corruption.
Since you are an expect on different types of corruption, you should also know that there is one thing that is common to every type of corruption in this context, i.e. financial incentives/bribery.
Spot fixing/spot corruption whatever you want to call it happens when there is financial reward in play.
Please provide evidence that PGMOL is taking payments from different clubs to give favorable decisions. That is what happened in Italian football.
You can’t escape this because I won’t allow you to. Please provide proof of financial irregularities in PGMOL if you want to accuse them of being corrupt.
Please provide evidence for PGMOL corruption.Running like a coward still waiting for response on martinelli, nketitah and havertz.
The fact your deflecting again
Once you respond, I will respond. Stop being a spineless poster.Please provide evidence for PGMOL corruption.
This isn't even remotely true and a distortion of realityNewcastle pretend to be a big club but when a big club comes to town they start playing rugby.
I think they were scared of letting Arsenal play especially after losing at home last season.
I guess it will take time for them to grow out of their small mentality and that won’t happen until they stop playing Arsenal rejects.
Very disappointed with Newcastle’s behavior and intentions but with Liverpool and Spurs all dropping points, it didn’t prove to be costly.
Wow if you think there is no corruption when it comes to refereeing
Last season we saw a clear hair pull and foul by spurs player in Chelsea game. VAR ignored the foul. Mike Dean said he didn't want to put his mate Anthony Taylor in tough spot
So if you are ignoring incidents on purpose that's not officiating game with integrity
Same as this season Howard Webb came out said Michael Oliver didn't send off Kovacic vs Arsensl as didn't want to spoil a big game. Again means that game isn't being officiated with integrity.
So referees in doing so are effecting outcomes of games by ignore incidents or making rules up for different games.
That is corruption. Just remember it's not always about the end result of match. It's about officials not doing things with integrity.
We've heard numerous times incidents haven't been referred to on field referees to look at screens etc.. because VAR refs don't want to make their mates look bad with initial decisions made. Again that's compromising the integrity of the game which is effectively corruption.
Yet your stuck on this continual point on Arteta moaning because your irriated at fact no one is giving Newcastle credit for a 1-0 win in a game neither side did enough to win.
Only person failing to understand is you and the called @Mamoon.Again, what you have described as incompetence or poor standards, not corruption
I don't think you understand what corruption means or you are deliberately misusing it
At no point have I said referees are brilliant, I've accepted the standards are poor but I disagree that it's corruption and I disagree with complaints about our goal
I'm stuck on the Arteta point because he made it into a big issue
As for the credit, it doesn't really bother me, we got the win and that is most important.
Please provide the evidence that I asked for. Stop embarrassing yourself.Once you respond, I will respond. Stop being a spineless poster.
The fact you can't comprehend that corruption doesn't just have to be for a team purpose shows how slow you are.
Like I said spot fixing is on events and occurrences not just results. You really are slow .
Either reply on your wild statement and go run off to cricket forum with your nonsense.
Only person failing to understand is you and the called @Mamoon.
If you compromise the integrity of the game that is corruption.
The FA came out after Anthony Taylor failed to send Mane off after a few minutes vs Chelsea few seasons back, saying the referee didn't want to have to send someone off early and spoil game.
Same thing happened with kovacic vs Arsensl. Webb saying oliver didn't send him off because again it was a big game.
Same goes for Mike Dean failing to refer a spurs hair pull vs Chelsea as he didn't want to put Taylor on the spot.
In simple terms as both of you are struggling with it. Referees are saying that in big games they weren't willing to send a player off early. Which means if it wasn't a big game, they would have done so.
That is basically saying in "bigger games" teams will be favoured more when it comes to red cards etc.. that is an integrity issue and essentially corruption as you are being more favourable in bigger games.
If either of you can't comprehend that then that's your own faults.
Go look up the legal links between integrity and corruption and you will see that they are linked.
Webbs comments after Arsensl vs City
View attachment 138822
So oliver didn't want to spoil the "big game" same ref who in a wolves vs Arsenal game sent Martinelli off for 2 fouls in 60 seconds. Like I said referees using different criteria depending on magnitude of game is integrity issue for those slow enough not to understand
Corruption does have to involve money always being exchanged. Corruption can involve compromising integrity and also also influence on eventsI guess we will have to agree to disagree on the term corruption, for me it involves money changing hands
What you are stating is more down to incompetence or weakness etc etc, it simply isn't corruption in my view but maybe you see the word differently and ultimately that's your call
My point still remains, Arteta was just upset his team conceded. He wasn't trying to raise a point about the standards of officiating and the statement from Arsenal was embarrassing as it was following a valid goal and it doesn't really help the situation in the slightest. But I don't believe Arteta really cares about improving the standards, just like Mourinho didn't nor Fergie didn't when they used to do the same kind of rants.
Webb would have spoken to Oliver and its not just a case of his interpretation as the FA apologised after the game, so Webb would have had to have got olivers explanation on things. I see you didn't mention either of 2 incidents I mentioned.That's just Howard Webb's interpretation of the incident
It was an error from Michael Oliver, he should have sent of him off but he's not the first referee to make a mistake and he won't be the last. Just like the ref that failed to send Nketiah off for his challenge on Vicario, was that corruption too?
Btw has the audio been released or the transcript of the audio? Can't seem to find it because I am intrigued as to the conversation/explanation that took placeWait till Audio is released from Newcastle vs Arsenal and you will see how incompetent they are
The comments from guiameres incident are a disgraceful.
Also from Audio of the ball being out, the referee are heard saying the ball looks out. Incompetence at its highest
So unless a player is using his arm as a "weapon" its not a red card these referees just make up rules as the go along. No referral pitch side and a pathetic excuse usedBtw has the audio been released or the transcript of the audio? Can't seem to find it because I am intrigued as to the conversation/explanation that took place
So unless a player is using his arm as a "weapon" its not a red card these referees just make up rules as the go along. No referral pitch side and a pathetic excuse used
View attachment 138846
VAR letting him off for something earlier, just shows lack of integrity again. A so called leveling up process is not officiating game in correct mannerYou got the link to the audio or the transcript?
As for Bruno, it was an absurd decision but I think VAR let him off because deep down they probably know Havertz should have been sent off
Which comes down to the standards not being high enough
Mate it was a stone wall foul...For those say Gabriel was leaning forward / going down on the Joelinton push. What was joelinton doing with his two arms out like that? Your certainly not using hands for leverage to jump.
We saw a penalty given against Arsena vs man city 2 seasons ago where a city player dived and was on his way to floor and then xhaka at last minute grabs his shirt and a pen given. Just shows these ref like to influence incidents in games how they see fit
Are we sure those quotes are legit? As so far I haven't seen any official audio released?VAR letting him off for something earlier, just shows lack of integrity again. A so called leveling up process is not officiating game in correct manner
This is what most sites are show as the Audio
The elbow and the push incidents are pathetic cop out excuses from FA ref
VAR had all angles of the Joelinton push, what did they think he was doing with his 2 hands?
View attachment 138849
That supposed VAR audio and quotes are fake bro, it was just a joke video. Nothing official has been released.VAR letting him off for something earlier, just shows lack of integrity again. A so called leveling up process is not officiating game in correct manner
This is what most sites are show as the Audio
The elbow and the push incidents are pathetic cop out excuses from FA ref
VAR had all angles of the Joelinton push, what did they think he was doing with his 2 hands?
View attachment 138849
Ah okay, that makes sense, as I hadn't seen anything official released.That supposed VAR audio and quotes are fake bro, it was just a joke video. Nothing official has been released.
Even the videos are identical, both clear pushes, no player in that instance is using his two hands for leverage.Good thing officials don't rely on photos to make their decisions
Good thing officials don't rely on photos to make their decisions
There is no denial, we got the goal given and I'm happy with it
Enjoy the highlights, on look its a 2 hand push, and they asked the referee to go to the screen.
Did that happen in Newcastle vs Arsenal game?
Keep up the denial
Bro, Again I asked the question what was joelinton using his arms for in that position? Whether Gabriel is leaning slightly forward is irrelevant. How was Joelinton trying to make an attempt to win the ball.There is no denial, we got the goal given and I'm happy with it
As for the two incidents, I'd argue they are different because Gabriel stoops forward as the cross is coming down whilst the Napoli cross is much higher and Raspadori uses the defender to climb up
Yeah same fraudeta that was humilated by olympiakos, villlareal and sporting Lisbon in europa league.@Amjid Javed
Commiserations for last night’s win. Your prayers weren’t answered.
“Fraudeta is clueless in Europe”
For me his hands are there in a natural position as he is jumping, he's not using Gabriel to leverage anything, he's simply in his wayBro, Again I asked the question what was joelinton using his arms for in that position? Whether Gabriel is leaning slightly forward is irrelevant. How was Joelinton trying to make an attempt to win the ball.
Numerous ex refs Hackett, clattenburg and few others have come out and said its a foul.
So a player naturally jumps by using 2 hands on someone's backFor me his hands are there in a natural position as he is jumping, he's not using Gabriel to leverage anything, he's simply in his way
I've already explained the difference between the two, you claimed I was in denial yet you are the one that is not able to differentiate between the two incidentsSo a player naturally jumps by using 2 hands on someone's back
If that's case why was napolis goal disallowed
Oh and Gabriel is in the way? What did you expect him to roll a red carpet out for Joelinton
Joelintons arms move outwards in a pushing motion, and that's not a natural position when jumping for a ball
There is no difference between the incidents, both players are climbing on the back of the defender using their hands to try and win a headerI've already explained the difference between the two, you claimed I was in denial yet you are the one that is not able to differentiate between the two incidents
I honestly think emotion is clouding your judgement, I've been there but usually it settles after a few days. The fact that you shared made up quotes attributed towards the VAR audio proves this, simply because the words used is what you wanted them to be
Please see the link I shared, the independent panel basically agrees with what I have been saying since day one
That's my point, you did a Google search and shared stuff without any verification because it suited your narrative that the VAR officials were clueless and confusedThere is no difference between the incidents, both players are climbing on the back of the defender using their hands to try and win a header
Emotions aren't clouding my judgement, because the game is done and things aren't going to change. I didn't share made up quotes, I just did a Google search and posted what I found.
.
Plenty of ex referees have been asked about this and loads of them say it was a foul.
The length of time they took to review the joelinton push they should have referred it to the on field referee.That's my point, you did a Google search and shared stuff without any verification because it suited your narrative that the VAR officials were clueless and confused
Again, the point you are missing is that there are mixed opinions on whether it was a foul (see the link I shared, 4 said no foul and 1 said foul) . What's clear is that it isn't a clear and obvious mistake (the very fact we have a split on a subjective decision proves this) and therefore VAR did the correct thing in sticking with the on field decision.
If the referee had given it as a foul I don't think VAR would have overturned it.
Not a howler, not a mistake and certainly not worth the tears from Arteta and Arsenal.
How long did they take reviewing it?The length of time they took to review the joelinton push they should have referred it to the on field referee.
Of course, that's how VAR works. The ref will make a judgement and the VAR will explain what they have seen and recommend a review.The referee for napoli game didn't see it was a foul but soon changed his mine after watching on the screen.
Not necessarily, all depends on what discussion took place. If the VAR official has looked at it and doesn't deem it to be a foul then why on earth would he send the referee to the monitor? You only send the ref if you believe he has made a mistakeSame should have been done with this incident. Its clearly obvious these VAR don't know what they are doing as each week they change how they look at incidents.
I don't doubt that, we are dealing with humans and dealing with different games, inconsistency is in football, has always been in football and sadly always will. The focus has to be on trying to minimise it as much as possible.you will see a similar push at the back post in a Premier league have a goal disallowed at least a few times before end of season.
No, I've posted the view of the Premier League's Independent Key Match Panel. Do you have an issue with them?All you have posted is what suits your narrative.
Where have I stated Bein sports are Gospel?According to you Bein sports is now gospel on the incidents that occurred