Blistering Barnacle
T20I Debutant
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2005
- Runs
- 7,577
- Post of the Week
- 1
And Rizwan goes.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Had Misbah scored 20(37) people would've been slating him
Well at least he isn't brain dead like a few other blokes in the lineup !!
Maybe you got a wrong meaning of explosive batsman.
Explosive batsman means someone who can UP the run rate as and when he wants.
You are confusing explosive batsmen with power hitters.
Kohli is an explosive batsman.
Just cos he rotates singles and doesn't go for it doesn't make him non explosive.
Considering he plays most of his shots in the air, I dunno how you will define this as decent technique. Decent technique is being able to hit the shots on the ground. 9 out of 10 times hitting the ball either to deep mid-wicket or getting out trying to cut a ball coming in, shows lack of technique
Akmal should be out of the team , why swap position.
I take my words back !!
no youve got it all wrong..there is no such thing as an explosive batsman..these are simply new words to box in players...there are good bastmen, great batsmen and legendary batsmen..end of..all this otehr stuff is nonsense..
a good batsmen is someone who can rotate the strike and in general say 5 times out of ten or 6 out of ten turn a fifty into a hundred..a great batsmen is someone who can turn a match on its head and build an innings...hit big hundreds and fifties but can occasionally falter..a legend is one who is relied upon and delivers everytime pretty much, either in a chase or in setting up a total..he may graft his way there or smash his way..eitehr way he produces innings that result in big runs and big wins..the rest is irrelevant..
that is his decision making. he can play fine on the ground at a decent SR. i have seen it many times. he doesn't trust that aspect of his batting enough.
not happening..I would lower my expectations..if we get to 240 ill be surprised..
ODI has changed so your classification is not accurate enough.
Is Rahane a good batsman?
Yes.
Is he a good batsman in ODI?
No.
Would he have been a good batsman in 80s?
Yes.
Same with Ashwin. He would have been a hero in 80s with the bat cos he just doesn't get out in ODIs and can play good quality bowling to notch up 30s and 50s and even 70s.
But he is USELESS today in ODI.
This is depressing. Bring Lala back.
He might be able to succeed as a lower-order hitter. That's the only position left for him
If we can get 50/60 from first 10. We will have 80/90 to get off last 10. Highly impossible giving circumstances but still possible. Imad needs to stay at crease or game over.
nope it hasnt..you need batsmen who can play proper cricket shots, rotate the strike and take advantage of the fielding restrictions..end of..that has always been the case in odi's..it has never changed..you can get away with hitting more shots nowadays but the basics are the same..the bowling and pitches are worse however..
mental issues here..why has he not kicked on? he looked decent when he first started and has a decent t20 record at home in domestics..
This is why Misbah and YK needs to be dropped, If Umar Akmal had enough practice in Test he would have chased this down
games already over..lets hope they fold in a fighting manner..
He might be able to succeed as a lower-order hitter. That's the only position left for him
how can you rely on batting of Nawaz? Wasim? b
we are playing with only 4 batsmen Azhar Sharjeel Babar and Rizwan
that is his decision making. he can play fine on the ground at a decent SR. i have seen it many times. he doesn't trust that aspect of his batting enough.
First of all your opener the great captain leading from the front doesnt deserve a One day cap let alone the captaincy
I am not comparing batsmanship quality of now vs 80s.
A hack like Dhawan or Rohit today >>>>>>>>>>>>> Rahul Dravid in modern ODIs.
Would Dhawan or Rohit succeed in 80s? No way.
But they are more useful today than many many slow coaches of 80s.
There is a mountain of evidence that points to the new classification needed for modern day LOI.
Azhar sharjeel and Babar. Rizwan is quite a tailender.
Azhar out there to bat. Wow
Azhar should not have come to bat.
This is why Misbah and YK needs to be dropped, If Umar Akmal had enough practice in Test he would have chased this down
Looking at how things are going our next odi team in west indies will be.
Sharjeel
Azhar
Shehzad
Hafeez
Babar
Akmal
Rizwan
Imad
Amir
Wahab
Umar gul
Junaid khan
Malik
Rahat
Malik
Malik, JK, Hassan Ali and Sarfi missing from 11
Take out shehzad, Akmal, Wahab and Gul
Good to go
not talking about slow coaches..akmal isnt a slow coach..he gets on with it..but he cant build an innings..he doesnt know what to leave and what to hit ,when.
this is arguably the best time to play as a batsman in ODI cricket..our players should be making big runs because it is a period where players who are technically deficient can make big runs..but it seems they have rubbish coaches, a backwards weak feeble mentality and a lack of pakistaniat!!
How many of you think:
1. Kamran is better than Umar & deserves to be in ODI team
2. Younis Khan should come back to ODI
3. Afridi should be called back - he still looks very fit to me.
My view: 1 and 3 to be more competitive.
its called bravery..he's one player on this tour who has shown respect to the green shirt..
First of all, I am not defending Akmal.
Second of all, the bolded statement is not true in an absolute way.
Take SL for example:
For someone like Aravinda De Silva, Jayasuriya, Gunawardene, Kaluwitharana - this is the BEST era to bat. They could have boosted their stats big time.
For someone like Marvan Attapattu, Roshan Mahanama, Hashan Thilakarathne - this is the WORST era to bat cos they won't have an ODI career.
Why so?
From the names, you can see why.
why not? he's the captain and will fight till the end..unlike other flash in the pan street lurkay..