ShehryarK
ODI Debutant
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2009
- Runs
- 11,129
- Post of the Week
- 1
Erm..Kaneria!?!!amar1212 said:gul is the only one missing......
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Erm..Kaneria!?!!amar1212 said:gul is the only one missing......
iafzal said:The attitude in Pakistan batting is day and night when comparing the 2nd innings to 1st innings.
It is refreshing to see this, it will be interesting to find out what happened in last couple of days to change it or who was behind it? Could it be Waqar?
Just to let you know, you comments are always good to read. They are precise, accurate and fun to read Hope to pull it off tomorrow Insha-Alla. Want these two stay way after lunchShehryarK said:Erm..Kaneria!?!!
Afzal will never give credit to Moyo, you are wsting your timeBig Mac said:Oh give me a break with Waqar this and Waqar that. Was it Waqar who was handing out phainty to Hauritz and Katich when most players would be happy to block and survive the day?
LOL!Big Mac said:Oh give me a break with Waqar this and Waqar that. Was it Waqar who was handing out phainty to Hauritz and Katich when most players would be happy to block and survive the day?
ur getting too excited we wont need the last 3..Afridi_Fan said:
:umarakmal
:akmal
:aamir
There are few post here, they never want to give credit to MoyoShehryarK said:LOL!
Waqar becharay kai farishtoun ko bhi khabar nahi ho gi keh he's now officially the Source of All That's Good About Pakistan Cricket (TM)
What about Watson's catch on 99,had we got him out there,Aussies would've folded for not more than 210 ..(BUT A.Rauf..issed: )....and going by your scenarios,we would have been chasing something around 352..ShehryarK said:Fair enough, all good points - just for argument's sake though, had we caught all those chances, Punter won't have declared in the two innings, would he?
Instead of 454/5d, it might have been 400 all out in the 1st, and instead of 225/8d in the 2nd, it might have been 275/10 in the 2nd...ie our target now would be the same.
The point is, we just don't know either way So let's make the most of where we are now, Day 1 is history
why do you keep us reming about that catch? It hurts. I wanted him out on 99Seen Sheen said:What about Watson's catch on 99,had we got him out there,Aussies would've folded for not more than 210 ..(BUT A.Rauf..issed: )....and going by your scenarios,we would have been chasing something around 352..
YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSStaqi said:fight till the end and make punter's declaration a joke
Seen Sheen said:What about Watson's catch on 99,had we got him out there,Aussies would've folded for not more than 210 ..(BUT A.Rauf..issed: )....and going by your scenarios,we would have been chasing something around 352..
Why, thank you!insaaniyat said:Just to let you know, you comments are always good to read. They are precise, accurate and fun to read
Insha Allah, hope we do...! As someone else rightly said, a win tomorrow would be as big as the biggest moment in the history of cricket..and that too happened at this very ground!insaaniyat said:Hope to pull it off tomorrow Insha-Alla. Want these two stay way after lunch
Not necessarily. If we had caught Watson at 99 (and I loathe his smug persona as much as the next red-blooded Pakistani), he won't have been playing the next over, he won't have hit the ball to Asif, he won't have called Mitchell Johnson for 2 there, and Mitchell Johnson would not have been run-out! Who knows, MJ and Hauritz might have put on a 100 run p/ship after Watson got out at 99.. MJ has done it before, y'knowSeen Sheen said:What about Watson's catch on 99,had we got him out there,Aussies would've folded for not more than 210 ..(BUT A.Rauf..issed: )....and going by your scenarios,we would have been chasing something around 352..
insaaniyat bhai,mera dil abhe tak ro reha hai..!watson gone on 99..Wow,I wouldve loved that moment..but right now,I am looking forward to getting a Chanceless ton..insaaniyat said:why do you keep us reming about that catch? It hurts. I wanted him out on 99
Yup,now I've realised how shrewd is..Big Mac said:It's all a genius plan to make Australia's humiliation and Pakistan's moment of glory all the more spectacular
But you used Ifs and Butts in your earlier post too.....But no worries and :umarakmal would make up for the dropped catches..ShehryarK said:Not necessarily. If we had caught Watson at 99 (and I loathe his smug persona as much as the next red-blooded Pakistani), he won't have been playing the next over, he won't have hit the ball to Asif, he won't have called Mitchell Johnson for 2 there, and Mitchell Johnson would not have been run-out! Who knows, MJ and Hauritz might have put on a 100 run p/ship after Watson got out at 99.. MJ has done it before, y'know
The point is - we just don't know what would have happened! Ifs and buts are irrelevant now... let's hope for something truly special tomorrow
And the one good thing about that dropped catch - A. Rauf will not be wearing our cap again, ever.
We will have that partnership, Insha-Allah. Don't worryWithLoveFromCanada said:yaar they need to have a partnership of 200 runs (right now they have made 54, so we need at least 150 more from these two)
My apologies, guess I wasn't clear in the earlier post - too excited about the match situation!Seen Sheen said:But you used Ifs and Butts in your earlier post too.....But no worries and :umarakmal would make up for the dropped catches..
Chuffed said:At least we know why Punter wasn't bowling Katich, he bowled some rank long hops.
taqi said:fight till the end and make punter's declaration a joke
Which is good for Pakistan. They score least when they are 'saving' a match.Random Aussie said:Looking at the match situation now it was a pretty good declaration.
That is not going to stop people on here jumping up and down crying "disrespect! arrogant!" etc but if we had kept batting for another session on day 2 we would probably not have enough time to win the match. And as it stands Pakistan won't be blocking the whole day because there is a target they can achieve if good enough.
If Pakistan score the highest ever score to win a Test match, Ponting will not get roasted by the media, our bowlers will be publicly executed outside CA headquarters.
Momo said:Which is good for Pakistan. They score least when they are 'saving' a match.
RexRex said:Pakistan will create history tomorrow and will be their 'Kolkatta 01' moment.
luvthegame said:Go for the win. We need 250 in 90 overs with 7 wickets.
If MOYO and Umar can stay till lunch add another 70-100 runs then we are looking at a possible win. Inshallah.
It will be historic.
Seen Sheen said:Haddin is AN AUSTRALIAN.....I think you've forgotten something...