What's new

England v Pakistan | First Test | Day 1 - Session 2 | Trent Bridge | 29/07/10

Status
Not open for further replies.
Good shot Morgan. This guy is a very good player, we need to get him out him early.
 
Might want to pitch it up in line that off-stump to the left-handed Morgan,cant bowl short to him.
 
Our batsmen tend to look so nervous,when you look at Morgan and Trott,they are more relaxed and actually enjoy their cricket.
 
"Aaah, look who it is, Paul Collingwood - he reckons this Pakistan attack is overrated. Next he'll be telling us Germany aren't much cop at football... surprised he didn't get a job as a pundit on the World Cup."

:)))
 
Found this on the BBC website, thought id share it with you guys "Aaah, look who it is, Paul Collingwood - he reckons this Pakistan attack is overrated. Next he'll be telling us Germany aren't much cop at football... surprised he didn't get a job as a pundit on the World Cup. Colly is off the mark with a clip off his pads for a couple..."
 
"Aaah, look who it is, Paul Collingwood - he reckons this Pakistan attack is overrated. Next he'll be telling us Germany aren't much cop at football... surprised he didn't get a job as a pundit on the World Cup."

:)))

haha ...who said that?
 
Shane Warne is a class act in commentary.Loving his analysis on Aamer.Give credit where its due.
 
Time to take Amir off. Don't want him to get tired.

Bring in Gul for a while now.
 
ENG gonna be 180 all out I think...
If this was Pakistan yes, we'd be out for that much 4 wickets down.

Realistically that's not going to happen. It's a good batting wicket, and England have the strongest tail in the world. We first have to get out both collingwood and Morgan, good bats (especially collingwood batting in tricky situations under pressure) and then Prior (who'd pretty good with the bat themselves. Even after all that, swann and broad averaging around 30 and 25 respectively (and even then anderson while not great at making runs, is good at staying in providing support to the batsman at the other end). It's going to be at least 200 most likely. However if wickets keep coming, pakistan will restrict them to under 300 (which would be quite an achievement on this track, english batsmen usually batting very well at home).
 
Mate, Tennis' hawk-eye displays the landed path. There is no way they can make errors with that. Thus, they use the hawk-eye to CM/MM precision.


and this displays the STRUCKING PATH.... *TOP OF THE STUMPS*

in tennis from naked eye if you see ball landing out of line its out

in cricket if you see ball hitting stumps or bail.. stumps slightly shattered u r out


MY QUESTION is why cant they make it simple

just see its hit in line...hitting stumps.. SIR YOU ARE OUT

SIMPLE AS THAT?.. WHATS ROCKET SCIENCE YOU NEED
 
if kami wasn't too busy worrying about if he can catch the simple ones...he might have the brain to dive forward for this catch
 
OMG AKMAL YOU CHEAT!

there's no way he didn't know it hadn't carried. and he just started celebrating instead of appealing.
 
Mohammad Asif has now dismissed Kevin Pietersen five times across all formats, which is as many times as he's got anyone else out.

What is that supposed to mean?
 
Why doesn't Kamran stand a little forward after that one fell short. Use some common sense you clown.
 
and this displays the STRUCKING PATH.... *TOP OF THE STUMPS*

in tennis from naked eye if you see ball landing out of line its out

in cricket if you see ball hitting stumps or bail.. stumps slightly shattered u r out


MY QUESTION is why cant they make it simple

just see its hit in line...hitting stumps.. SIR YOU ARE OUT

SIMPLE AS THAT?.. WHATS ROCKET SCIENCE YOU NEED

Still doesn't get it :))
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top