What's new

England v Pakistan | First Test | Day 1 - Session 2 | Trent Bridge | 29/07/10

Status
Not open for further replies.
Does anyone knows an indian resturant that sells 3 weeks old food?

Pls if you do know some place like this invite asoka over there so he gets food poison and we get rid of this piece of ****.
 
Big Mac said:
If the umpire gave it out and Pietersen referred it then it would have stayed out.

The review system is there to overturn the blatantly bad decisions, not the close ones.
Click to expand...


whats the point of REVIEW SYSTEM INCLUSION . .. (FAIR PLAY)

no team should be harmed by a bad decision ( close call or bad call)


Cricketing technicality is hit in line.. hitting stumps u r gone.. finish


so the policy they made... only BAD DECISIONS will be over turned not close one..... so THIS SYSTEM as i SAID ... SUCKED BIG TIME
 
shan said:
"had de Silva given it out on field that would not have been overturned either. So, Pakistan are down to one review "

What kind of system is that? England should have been 4 down by now, stupid UDRS! Seriously this system sucks big time.
Click to expand...

Had some decisions gone Pakistan's way, I bet you would be saying "I love this UDRS system!" :)
 
bet england will get all the 50-50 decisions when they ball asoka should have raised his finger to the naked eye it looked a good shout. Thats the difference between average and good umpires.
 
What the hell is happening out there......!!!!!!!!!!

:akmal sucks big time......He was in the best position to judge whether he hit it or not....!!

:pissed:
 
Not out and now we've lost both%2
 
Last edited:
lol @ US

we take reviews when its not out and don't take reviews when its out.
 
adnan yasin said:
whats the point of REVIEW SYSTEM INCLUSION . .. (FAIR PLAY)

no team should be harmed by a bad decision ( close call or bad call)


Cricketing technicality is hit in line.. hitting stumps u r gone.. finish


so the policy they made... only BAD DECISIONS will be over turned not close one..... so THIS SYSTEM as i SAID ... SUCKED BIG TIME
Click to expand...

A system that removes umpiring howlers sucks? :93:
 
adnan yasin said:
please some one explain me the review system..

what crap system is this :O
Click to expand...

If Bowling team appeals for a LBW, and Umpire rejects it, And Bowling goes for a review, then 3rd Umpire will have look on that the Ball has clipped the wicket convincingly or not, If it does hit the wicket convincingly, then its will over turn the decision of field Umpire and will be given as out, or if the ball does not hit the wicket convincingly like just touched the bells or just slight part of the ball touched the stump, then it will not be given as out...
 
Hell... will review system ...

MAchine is not helpful... pathetic policy only out of sort bad decision . . will be over turned. not close call..

what crap rule is that

as per this rule :)... KP is still out there batting .... though he was hit in line ball hitting the stumps

wow great use of technology...
 
Nevertheless it was a beauty from Asif, KP had no clue.
 
Both calls were justified in my opinion, but the one they should have gone for which was out they didnt (my confused face)

Only thing now is umpires maybe reluctant to give a decision knowing they cant get challenged
 
Come on lads get one and IA it will bring more. We are bowling well here, just need a little bit of luck
 
adnan yasin said:
Hell... will review system ...

MAchine is not helpful... pathetic policy only out of sort bad decision . . will be over turned. not close call..

what crap rule is that

as per this rule :)... KP is still out there batting .... though he was hit in line ball hitting the stumps

wow great use of technology...
Click to expand...

Relax. It makes sense to not give those out.

There has to be room for error. The Hawk-eye system is not perfect, thus it does not make sense to give those close ones out.
 
Forget the review system for a moment and look on the bright side. Kamran held on to one :27::27::27:
 
1two3 said:
If Bowling team appeals for a LBW, and Umpire rejects it, And Bowling goes for a review, then 3rd Umpire will have look on that the Ball has clipped the wicket convincingly or not, If it does hit the wicket convincingly, then its will over turn the decision of field Umpire and will be given as out, or if the ball does not hit the wicket convincingly like just touched the bells or just slight part of the ball touched the stump, then it will not be given as out...
Click to expand...


YEAH so .. its = pathetic policy made


in tennis.... AFTER REVIEW if a ball is out or in by CM or a MM its been given as OUT or IN they done see whether it is 5 inch out or 5 mm out

that is called FAIR PLAY
 
I guess it would be fair to say that Asif has got KP's number, class bowling
 
OUT!!!!!!!

Got him this time, no review required!

Asif deserved it.......
 
OHHHHHHH YOU BEAUTY !!!!!!!!! WHAT A HIT SON ! WHAT A HIT !!!!
:out
ASIF BEATS KP AGAIN !!!!

PAKISTAN ZINDABAD

THE MARKHORS ARE COMING !!!!!!

*Inhale,exhale*
 
Watch Out guys Asif is on a run to take another.. May be Collinwood is next to go.. :asif
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

FearlessRoar
England (376 & 87/0) comfortably defeat West Indies (282 & 175) in the 3rd Test by 10 wickets to clinch the series 3-0
2 3
Replies
188
Views
3K
James
James
BouncerGuy
England (416 & 425) convincingly defeat West Indies (457 & 143) by 241 runs in the 2nd Test match to win the series 2-0 with one match to play
2 3 4
Replies
287
Views
6K
James
James
FearlessRoar
Pakistan reach 109/3 at the end of Day 2 of the first Test against the West Indies, with a lead of 202 runs
4 5 6
Replies
465
Views
10K
Amjid Javed
Amjid Javed
Cricket Warrior
England reach 96/1 in reply to Pakistan's first Innings total of 556 at stumps on Day 2 of the first Test
7 8 9
Replies
714
Views
17K
Savak
Savak
FearlessRoar
Pakistan (230 & 157) defeat West Indies (137 & 123) by 127 runs in the first Test match to secure a 1-0 lead in the 2-Match series
3 4 5
Replies
336
Views
7K
Human786
H
Back
Top