Leeon1994
Tape Ball Star
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2013
- Runs
- 870
Amla can't deliver under pressure. In this aspect, forget kohli, raina > amla.
P.s. Talking about only handling pressure here. Not technicality issues.
Raina > Amla? Embarassing to say the least.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Amla can't deliver under pressure. In this aspect, forget kohli, raina > amla.
P.s. Talking about only handling pressure here. Not technicality issues.
trolling? Why is that?Oh, you're just a troll. Whatever helps you sleep at night.
trolling? Why is that?
_________________________
Vs Australia avg 29, in Australia avg 31.88.
Vs England avg 62.45, in England 54.33.
Vs India avg 49.88, in India avg 33.73.
Vs NZ avg 53.35, in NZ 55.23.
Vs SA avg 29.75, in SA 26.10.
Vs Sri avg 29.00, in Sri avg 33.80.
Vs WI avg 101.16, in WI 69.75.
________________________
these are definately not world class numbers bru. Again he had a crazy 20 inning where he scored 2000 odd runs at an avg of 100, and thats it. He's a decent player nothing more, not in the same league as Amla.
sehwag made 219 and broke tendu's record of 200. Does it mean sehwag > tendu?
You guys are missing the point. I am saying, when it comes to pressure situation, amla fails. He can make 500 in an odi but that even doesn't change this fact. He is not a match winner unlike kohli.
How many experts would agree with you? How many would say that Mohammad Yousuf was not a great player?
define a great player?
In my opinion his overall stats were inflated by those 20 innings. Which is why he has a poor record in most countries. He is a decent player. Anyway he is definately not better than Amla which was my main argument. People can debate among themselves whats decent/good/great or whatever.
Who are those experts? Are they the ones who said Flinttof was better than Kallis?Your opinion doesn't count, sorry to say. Former players and experts, Pakistani and non-Pakistani have all said that Yousuf was a great player.
Comparing him with Amla is unfair because the latter is still playing and is in his prime years. Compare them when Amla retires.
Who are those experts? Are they the ones who said Flinttof was better than Kallis?
anyway i am not demeaning the guy. He is in the mold of VVS but Laxman was more consistent across countries. I would pick him before Yousuf. VVS is a good player not great but good/very good (whatever definition you wanna use). Yousuf is in between that, but he is not better than VVS IMO.
Look at their ages people ...
sehwag made 219 and broke tendu's record of 200. Does it mean sehwag > tendu?
You guys are missing the point. I am saying, when it comes to pressure situation, amla fails. He can make 500 in an odi but that even doesn't change this fact. He is not a match winner unlike kohli.
lol Amla is clearly the better player
22 off 65. Uncharacteristic Amla innings.
And I don't think Kohli will be as good as he was in ODIs ever again! He's too much into tests now.. Wants to prove himself there rather than in meaningless Jamodis
Amla can't play in pressure. A true saf. Virat is the man!
Do you remember how Kohli fared against this bowling attack in pressure situations? And I'm not talking about the Asia cup for obvious reasons.
But i dont understand what level you are talking about. Amla is already a better player to Yousuf. All i know is he is just a guy who had a crazy 20 innings in Test cricket and scored 2000 odd runs at an average of 100+ second only to Bradman. Else he was another hyped up player, you can look at his record across countries if you like. He was decent nothing more, not in Amla's league, sorry.
Pretty silly is this notion given that a lot of South Africa's major players have stated that Amla's temperament calms their own nerves down as well.
why not?
Pretty silly is this notion given that a lot of South Africa's major players have stated that Amla's temperament calms their own nerves down as well.
silly logic. I feel good when i see a pretty girl. Does it mean she feels the same looking at me?
Possibly because the pitch was probably the flattest that we've seen in quite some time. When Hafeez scores a century and Younis strikes at more than 150, you know the pitch is a road.
This is a point too far, similar to the guy who tried to argue that Amla could make for a good captain because Steyn is 'inspired' by his reading of the Koran. There is support for a player and then there is just nonsense.
Have this debate by all means, but stick to serious and credible inquiry.
I've never understood the average Pakistani fan's affiliation with Amla. Is there any other reason, aside from him being Muslim?
I've never understood the average Pakistani fan's affiliation with Amla. Is there any other reason, aside from him being Muslim?
LOL!! Your analogies are hilarious. Only a mentally strong player can make other batsmen feel easy at the crease.
the criteria i gave is pressure, nt pitch or weather or any other factor. Hence irrelevant.
So you and Itachi know more about Amla's temperament then his own teammates? Its a very valid point.
not necessarily. Even if tendu is scratchy, low on confidence, raina wil feel confident seeing tendu at opposite end. That doesn't automaticaly implies tht x person is mentaly strong. How do i know? From the results.
I've never understood the average Pakistani fan's affiliation with Amla. Is there any other reason, aside from him being Muslim?
So you and Itachi know more about Amla's temperament then his own teammates? Its a very valid point.
What Marshland has said is correct. There are many players out there who conduct themselves professionally, have a useful effect on their team-mates, and average 50. But when it comes to Amla, every positive point that could possibly be yanked out of the poor guy is exploited relentlessly by some of you fellas, just because he is a Muslim and wears a beard. There really is no other palpable reason for this behaviour. At least try and be objective.
Aside from averaging 50+ in both formats of the game, being the number one batsman in both formats of the game and being a pleasure to watch, there really is no reason.
If he was not Muslim, he won't get half the attention he gets now at PP. Nothing against Amla, he is fantastic bat and person.
Being Muslim does help though.
if you have it, it wil show in field. No one can stop it.
Did it show? Nope. Which means....
if you have it, it wil show in field. No one can stop it.
Did it show? Nope. Which means....
I read that and then read this -
Told me all I needed to know.
If he was not Muslim, he won't get half the attention he gets now at PP. Nothing against Amla, he is fantastic bat and person.
Nope. If Tendu is struggling, the other batsmen will struggle too, especially the inexperienced ones. What results tell you whether or not a batsman is mentally strong?
I've never understood the average Pakistani fan's affiliation with Amla. Is there any other reason, aside from him being Muslim?
He is one of the best out there, no doubts whatsoever! But you may be right and also considering the player with whom he's being compared to is, ahem ahem, an Indian
Yeah, this. Maybe the same sentiments exist for the Khawajas and Tahirs of this world as well.
Comment on Amla's superb innings in the third ODI.
No. Wanna fight about it? What affiliation? I don't get this. Amla fans have a more than legitimate claim to debate whether or not he is the best batsman in the world or whatever. What's being Muslim got to Do with anything? How do you know what affiliation any fan has with a particular player? You can't dismiss an opinion just because you think he/she is an 'Ajmalista ' or an 'Amlard'. Their records speak for themselves and their admirers, supporters.
So just because he's a Muslim and I'm a Muslim makes his performances redundant?
If he was not Muslim, he won't get half the attention he gets now at PP. Nothing against Amla, he is fantastic bat and person.
no pressure, in came the superb innings.
Yeah, this. Maybe the same sentiments exist for the Khawajas and Tahirs of this world as well.
They just need to play some good cricket then you will see them put on very high pedestal. PPers don't get opportunity to express that sentiments because those two are not playing even average cricket.
Amla is great guy and very good batsman but being a Muslim put him in different league at PP. I don't have any issue with it but that's a reality. But some time bringing religion in sports is weird.
I remember one Pakistani batsmen was apologetic to all Muslim in world after losing to India in WC or may be some other important game. That was extremely weird thing to see. If a player in national team can have such views then it's not surprising that an average PPers will put Amla on different league after he give then opportunity with his good performances.

Yes, I mean, that's not like Amla's averaging 58 @ SR +90 in ODIs, tops the ICC rankings right now or is the fastest to get 3000 runs in the format, a bit ahead of the best ODI bat ever, Sir Viv Richards.
All of that doing in a country like SA where it's the easiest to face the new ball for an opener, as probably all know.
Hyped, much.
(I'm not even talking of Tests, there's no competition right now, one got a 300 against the best Test bowling attack in their own backyard, but the other is still too young to judge, even if many other "legends" never crossed the +300 mark, let alone away.)
If he was not Muslim, he won't get half the attention he gets now at PP. Nothing against Amla, he is fantastic bat and person.
No one denies that but it's clear case of Amla being put on different pedestal due to being a Muslim. If he was a non Muslim then most will still appreciate his batting because he is class but we wouldn't have seen this extra support based on religion.
No pressure? Saffers were 2 down for 28 after the first ten overs, with the ball swinging and bouncing off the pitch.
What about his innings in the second innings of the Cape Town test? Or the one against Australia in the 47 all out one?
No. Wanna fight about it? What affiliation? I don't get this. Amla fans have a more than legitimate claim to debate whether or not he is the best batsman in the world or whatever. What's being Muslim got to Do with anything? How do you know what affiliation any fan has with a particular player? You can't dismiss an opinion just because you think he/she is an 'Ajmalista ' or an 'Amlard'. Their records speak for themselves and their admirers, supporters.

They just need to play some good cricket then you will see them put on very high pedestal. PPers don't get opportunity to express that sentiments because those two are not playing even average cricket.
Amla is great guy and very good batsman but being a Muslim put him in different league at PP. I don't have any issue with it but that's a reality. But some time bringing religion in sports is weird.
I remember one Pakistani batsmen was apologetic to all Muslim in world after losing to India in WC or may be some other important game. That was extremely weird thing to see. If a player in national team can have such views then it's not surprising that an average PPers will put Amla on different league after he give then opportunity with his good performances.
No one denies that but it's clear case of Amla being put on different pedestal due to being a Muslim. If he was a non Muslim then most will still appreciate his batting because he is class but we wouldn't have seen this extra support based on religion. You will notice that most non Pakistani fans rate Amla very high and like him a lot but they go overboard with coming up with some non existing scenarios to put him on different pedestal. Even a Paksitani fan in same page acknowledged that being Muslim helped.
i don't know what test innings doing here when the thread is about odi (see the title).
Does ABD who is at least in the same league as Amla get as much attention as Amla? I don't think so. There can only be one explanation.
duh! Test and odi are two different world. Otherwise hilfenhaus, philander would have been world beater(in odi) or malinga > steyn(in test). Dravid couldn't save a spot in odi team.So Amla has temperament in tests but not in ODIs, seriously?
So Amla has temperament in tests but not in ODIs, seriously?
de Villiers is perhaps even better.
convenient how we're judging batsmen on their ability to handle pressure rather than their ability to bat. In that case kohli > bradman probably too, why not?
Did anyone see kohli bat against the slightest bit of nagging movement from Jkhan? Looked like a tailender.
Amla MILES and MILES ahead. When a bowler starts pushing him around like Junaid Khan did to Kohli, then I'll humbly take back this statement.
Amla dominates bowlers indiscriminately. Kohli struggles against quality bowling.
duh! Test and odi are two different world. Otherwise hilfenhaus, philander would have been world beater(in odi) or malinga > steyn(in test). Dravid couldn't save a spot in odi team.

See, when we're talking about performance in presssure situations, it doesn't matter whether its a test, ODI or even a T20. Mentally strong players will succeed in pressure situations, mentally weak ones will fail. Philander, Steyn and Dravid did not have the skill and ability to succeed in the shorter format and thus were poor. Had nothing to do with temperament.