Shami is far better than Junaid and a better than Bhuvenshwar as well.
Most exciting prospect in the subcontinent at the moment.
Again you love making just stupid statement. And I just have to call you out on them because I hate people who despise any use of the word logic.
Shami is far better than Junaid and Kumar is at the level of Junaid. Both statements are completely wrong and have no reasoning as to why.
Far better is like saying Younus Khan is a far better test batsman than Mohammad Hafeez.
In no way by any means is Shami far better than Junaid.
Just look at stats. Shami in ODIs has a higher average, with a higher strike rate as well as a higher economy rate.
And frankly, Shami just doesn't have that aggression and wicket taking mentality of Junaid. To me it's obvious who's more talented and who will be the better player in the future. Just because Shami and Kumar get more movement with the ball doesn't mean they're better than Junaid, see how ineffective these bowlers become when they're put under pressure near the end of the game.
I've seen Junaid come up extremely big near the end of the game in several situations. Even though he hasn't performed in tournaments, he's only played in 2 which isn't a big enough sample size to say he cannot perform in tournaments.
He's only played one match in this tournament as well which again isn't a large enough sample size to say he cannot perform.
Btw to say Kumar is at Junaid's level is just plain wrong. Kumar has played 35 ODIs with 37 wickets at and average of 37....you can't even compare the two. Junaid has been consistently in the mid 20s throughout his career.
Kumar is better than Junaid in T20s but a cricketer is judged more based on his abilities and performances in ODs and Test before that of T20. Based on both ability and performance, Junaid has been at a much higher level than Kumar in these formats.