Akmal Dynasty
First Class Star
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2012
- Runs
- 3,941
He is needed now in SA as a backup middle order batsman.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
No no Shafiq does not brainfart. Shafiq doesn't brainfart because Shafiq does not have a brain.
What type of stupid stupid shot is that in this situation?
Please fly in Umar Akmal.
Haris sohail is far better than Unless Umar akmal
Would have loved to see Umar Akmal playing today.
lol, yes at 30/5, Umar would most likely have felt the call of the hour would be a huge six over midwicket and have edged behind. His fans should be relieved he isn't having to face this test attack - can keep his mythology alive.
It's the old English philosophy of the bloke outside the team becoming a superstar.
Remove those NZ knocks by Akmal and pull up his averages, they wouldn't be much better than his teammate's. He's okay, but the hype of him here is immense.
lol, yes at 30/5, Umar would most likely have felt the call of the hour would be a huge six over midwicket and have edged behind. His fans should be relieved he isn't having to face this test attack - can keep his mythology alive.
Yeah, but I said "remove" the NZ series and pull up the figures.
Even a spud like Shaun Marsh had a good series to start off.
Why remove Umar Akmal in NZ? Was it his cat who scored those runs against Bond & Vettori?
Lol...
Yeah .. U. Akmal would have destroyed Steyn , Philander and Morkel single handedly.
He would have batted like Vivian.
He never crumbles under pressure.
He would have single handedly won the match for Pakistan....
Lol...
Yeah .. U. Akmal would have destroyed Steyn , Philander and Morkel single handedly.
He would have batted like Vivian.
He never crumbles under pressure.
He would have single handedly won the match for Pakistan....
Nope - please don't twist things....
Please simply respond to the stats and facts listed above.
If you really are a Dr - you will understand what FACTS usually mean?
Go and defend your awful gul.
Yaar...
Seriously look at facts.
I can support U. Akmal's inclusion in ODI's , that too with some reservation.
But when Steyn is bowling like this , even Tendulkar wouldn''t have had a chance, what to talk of U.Akmal
Did you actually see his figures ? 8 - 6 - 8 - 6
You think Akmal could have nullified him?
Keep dreaming.
Pakistan rarely play outside Asia/West Indies/Zimbabwe from memory and looking at the FTP, so if I were Akmal I would be thankful to allow my teammates be led like lambs for slaughter in the toughest of conditions and watch my reputation grow in the meantime in spite of not even playing a match!
Lol...
Yeah .. U. Akmal would have destroyed Steyn , Philander and Morkel single handedly.
He would have batted like Vivian.
He never crumbles under pressure.
He would have single handedly won the match for Pakistan....
Im talking about facts.... and you are talking about hypotheticals?
Please stick to facts - It makes life a lot easier.
I dont know what Umar Akmal would have got.... 0-400*... Pick any number in between. Frankly it doesnt matter!!!
All I know is that based on the FACTS ABOVE (post 1112) - Umar Akmal was MORE LIKELY to get MORE RUNS than many of the others got today....
Can you argue with the FACTS?
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Akmals love playing fast bowlers..they'd have enjoyed batting against this Saffer attack.
So in short: if he succeeds , I told you so .
If he fails : he is still talented, give him time cuz he is young.
Can you say yes to both points ? Cuz that makes me decide what you really are : )
lol @ he never crumbles under pressure : )
So in short: if he succeeds , I told you so .
If he fails : he is still talented, give him time cuz he is young.
Can you say yes to both points ? Cuz that makes me decide what you really are : )
averages 90+ with 95 sr. in ODIs we have won chasing so yes he doesn't..
Simple fact is that you have to look at UPSIDE POTENTIAL with youngsters...
All youngsters make mistakes...
You look at what "Peaks" they hit...
Then in time they iron out the weaknesses and the "Peak" becomes regular...
Umar Akmal has done some wonderful things (albeit infrequently)....
His "Peak" is higher than ANY player that has made their debut since Feb 2000.
Its for THIS REASON that I am a fan of Umar Akmal....
Its not about "TALUNT" - I HATE THAT WORD - IT SHOULD BE BANNED ON PP!!!!!
Its about what "peaks" you have hit.
Now if over a long period of time the "peaks" are so infrequent that he becomes a liability (ie he becomes the 6th best batsman in the side (in spite of his peaks) then I would drop him.
Now you decide how that fits in with your question.
Hmm,
okay as long as you hate the word "Talunt" I'm fine.
Here's the thing. I think he is lucky that Pakistan seriously suffers from lack of batting talent.
That makes him get away with most atrocious of shots at worst possible time.
As far as tests are concerned, I think you should be happy he is not playing.
Perhaps we can continue living on his New Zealand thrashing myths for a long time, because I have a feeling even he would have struggled today : )
Wasn't Umar Akmal part of the team which was bowled out for 74,147, 182 and 80 in the swinging and seaming conditions of England?
He was going to do what exactly had he been picked?
lol - I hate the word with a passion!
He may have struggled - He probably would have struggled - But based on history he is more likely to have done better than everyone but Misbah Azhar or Younis (at the very least) on any given day.
Now lets move onto the bolded part of your post....
This is one of the things that I also hate about PP.... the obsession with getting out to atrocious shots!
Who the hell cares how someone gets out? Its what they do before they get out that matters!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
No its winning that matters : )
Remember how Michael Hussey finished the job for Australia in the T20 WC semifinal?
Did he say, oh I made 50 of 20 balls. Someone else can do the job for me..
He carried his team through to the end.
Because at the end of the day , I'd take a winning 18* off 3 balls to win when 3 balls are remaining then a
40 off 40 balls and losing your wicket at wrong time : )
Winning matters - but you need to understand that you win matches by SCORING MORE RUNS than the opposition....
Lets say there are 10 games on the trot....
The opposition team gets 250 batting first each time....
Pakistan chase each time....
There are still 250 runs to get in each game!!!!
You have 7 batsmen to get those 250 runs....
Those 7 batsmen need to get 36 runs each on average for us to WIN every game.
Only 1 person can get the "Winning runs".... in each game.
18 off 3?
That would only work if the previous batsmen had got 232 runs previously?
What was more important the 232 runs or the 18 off 3?
PS: I believe that :umarakmal averages ninety something chasing in wins?
Since his test debut Umar has played 5 complete test series.
Against Newzealand he was our Best batsman.
Against Australia in Australia He was our 2nd best.
Against England in England he again scored more than All our batsmen.
Against West Indies he was again our second best.
Hasn't played against bangladesh
Against south africa got only one innings and dropped
Against zimbabwe he got out in a most unfortunate manner and got dropped.
Yeah he does average that.
I never denied it.
Once again , you defend him because you think his job is done after scoring 35 , 40 odd runs.
Since your aspirations are so low for him, I really can't start an honest discussion with you : )
?
My aspirations are high - very high (higher than yours)... but they remain aspirations only...
Your expectations are too high.... and you are confusing that with aspirations...
Fact is :umarakmal is a limited batsman.... but he is better than the the others. He can get better, but the CAN means nothing until he does it.
Well if you expect every Pakistani batsmen to have done his job after scoring 30 to 35 odd runs ( not just Umar Akmal)
once again, there is no need to start a discussion is there ? : )
And on second thought, you say he is a limited batsmen , while most fans say he is just an amazing batsmen.
Why the contradiction ? Do they see something you don't? Or do you see something they are blind to see ?
: )
It's laughable this thread has been bumped
Like if Akmal would've played a Laxman/Dravid innings.
It's laughable this thread has been bumped
Like if Akmal would've played a Laxman/Dravid innings.
No but he would have tried to play his shots and if he succeeded he would have messed the bowlers line up .
god umar fan boys get a grip!!every time a batsman gets out this thread is bumped.
as if umar bradman has hit 300 of 50 balls or something.
Right, can you please give me examples from the past when Akmal came in a similar situation as today and "messed" up the bowlers line?
Ok just one for now but the last test vs England in 2010
Everyone around him fell and he played his shots and scored well
Yaar 2013 agaya hy abb tow :-(
Even Afridi played cricket for 13 years because on one century ...
Yaar 2013 agaya hy abb tow :-(
Even Afridi played cricket for 13 years because on one century ...
Aray yaar!
You have forgotten post 1112 so quickly?
Memory of a goldfish?
Yaar actually I think he should be tried in ODI
Wahan bi kafi bekaar time par out hoga, but at least he will make you happy by scoring 40 odd runs.
In tests, we cannot afford him to throw his wicket.
We cant afford anyone to throw their wicket to be honest, but he is the worst of them in this regard.
So ODI and T20 okay.
I think he needs a run in the test side to prove himself I also think it will improve his ODI game . No harm in giving him a go it's not like everyone else is doing exceptionally well .
Actually everyone else is doing well, our test batting line-up has been decent for quite some time and today was their first big failure. So you want to drop people based on that and replace them with a guy who hasn't even made the test squad for a couple of years?
If u read post 1112 you will see that he scores more runs than the others in tough conditions before "throwing" his wicket away
Here's the thing dude.
He really is NOT test material. Doesn't have the patience to cut it at TEST level. NOT YET.
The moment he starts constructing his innings in ODI's ( hopefully by a consistent run at no 3 or 4 position for 15 games ) ,
And the moment he starts developing a sense of cricketing knowledge,
he can be safely added to the test squad.
You sound like the dude, Khaleefa, who said Pakistan must play test cricket aggressively like a T20 match.
I hope you really don't believe, that attacking all the time wins you test matches.