Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
unfit playersWood , Stokes and Robinson should have been played instead of the mediocre triplets they have now.
Robinson that year was fit and bowling at least 132-133 kph on average and is very effective bowling at those speeds.I think English selectors do deserve blame for selecting such an inexperienced attack. What is the point of keeping Ollie Robinson out other than 'we don't like him and his antics'? He was one of their best bowlers on the last PAK tour.
They remember scoring 450+ and then declaring , pretty sure they will not do the same thing again and will look to score atleast 550 hence they are batting slow.Imagine Bangladesh team creating a psychological impact on how Pakistan bats in Tests. As outlandish it sounds it has some truth to it.
Wood , Stokes and Robinson should have been played instead of the mediocre triplets they have now.
Most of the bowlers bowls around 133-137k speed in test cricket and it's perfectly acceptable , some of them bowl even more and some even less but it doesn't matter as long as the bowler is taking wicket at whatever pace he bowls at.Robinson that year was fit and bowling at least 132-133 kph on average and is very effective bowling at those speeds.
But when he trundlers and bowls 4-5 kph less , he's a very mediocre bowler.
That's why they dropped him.
Pakistan’s all format captainUnbelievably dismal that.
Robinson that year was fit and bowling at least 132-133 kph on average and is very effective bowling at those speeds.
But when he trundlers and bowls 4-5 kph less , he's a very mediocre bowler.
That's why they dropped him.
Robinson played one test in India and he got injured. After that he was not picked. Not sure if he has recovered fully. But he looked very mediocre against India.
Robinson wasn't taking wickets. He was barely fit. Wicketless in his last 2 TestsMost of the bowlers bowls around 133-137k speed in test cricket and it's perfectly acceptable , some of them bowl even more and some even less but it doesn't matter as long as the bowler is taking wicket at whatever pace he bowls at.
His junoonis will say it’s gamesmanshipDumb shot ?
Sacrificed himself for the team as alwaysHis junoonis will say it’s gamesmanship
Have you seen Shaheen and Naseem's fitness? They were struggling to hit 130 kph in their second and third spells against Bangladesh.Because currently he is not fit enough to bowl even 8 overs a day at full throttle. He was throwing 128k pies in county cricket without any line or length , got removed from the playing XI because of that.
Wood is out injured for a year. Stokes is not fit enough to bowlWood , Stokes and Robinson should have been played instead of the mediocre triplets they have now.
Now England sensing below 450 wrap up, and they will bat looooong
His junoonis will say it’s gamesmanship
Have you seen Shaheen and Naseem's fitness? They were struggling to hit 130 kph in their second and third spells against Bangladesh.
We feel sad every day for Pakistan actuallyHaha Today is rizwan haters are feeling very happy.
2 wickets for 68 runs on a road?Pakistan session
One was Naseem wicket .2 wickets for 68 runs on a road?
Yea but Jamal was bowling 128k and all over the place in his first spell.Have you seen Shaheen and Naseem's fitness? They were struggling to hit 130 kph in their second and third spells against Bangladesh.
That’s being a bit disingenuous and you know it! They made 30Rizbabar 29 runs
He had the guts to bat before Rizwan who soiled his pants seeing Babar get out last nightOne was Naseem wicket .
I just checked the score card. Gone for a 0 hahaYeah he missed his all format 300* by 300 runs unfortunately
It’s mental games by the legend. He’s making England worried that the pitch might be breaking up. This 0 will scare England now that Rizzu Symonds couldn’t score on this trackI just checked the score card. Gone for a 0 haha
This is why runs matter, but Albert Einstein's were telling me that rizzu form in a one day tournament doesn't matter.It’s mental games by the legend. He’s making England worried that the pitch might be breaking up. This 0 will scare England now that Rizzu Symonds couldn’t score on this track
Einstein sir is going to be busy and will not be responding until the next Test match I believe. Some of his findings have turned out to be horribly incorrect.This is why runs matter, but Albert Einstein's were telling me that rizzu form in a one day tournament doesn't matter.
Oh bhai it was the most recent tournament and he's facing rubbish on rubbish pitches and you think all that magically dissappears just because he's now playing Test?
Yes bro we have Lillee, Warne and Ambrose in our attackPakistan is in good position with 397 already on the board, two inform batters on the crease and two sloggers still to come. They will have just over 3 days to bowl England out twice.
PaKisTaN bAtTeRs DoNt TaKe ShaNs ApRoAcH sErIoUsLy @shariqnoorPakistan's batting comparison:
Day 1, 1st session: 122/1 (25), RR: 4.88
Day 2, 1st session: 69/2 (26), RR: 2.65
Pathetic approach
Even against Nepal they can'tPak batters can't accelerate under these conditions even against minnow level bowling attack? Better to replace the so called stars.
But but but we don’t have anyone who can play international cricket in our domestics…Pak batters can't accelerate under these conditions even against minnow level bowling attack? Better to replace the so called stars.
Captain bhangre daTeam ki Halat dekho, Shan is the best player
To be honest bro it's because recently I've been super active cause my uni is almost over and I'll take a break after that.You lot have so much time on your hands to sit and watch this the whole day.
Actually it's true and we don't have any one in domestic cricket who can play aggressive brand of cricket on a consistent basis but no harm in trying and grooming any young talented player to do that.But but but we don’t have anyone who can play international cricket in our domestics…
@gazza619
@Ahmed216
@AAli98
@Local.Dada
@Mamoon
You don’t have anyone who can score 30 off 71?Actually it's true and we don't have any one in domestic cricket who can play aggressive brand of cricket on a consistent basis but no harm in trying and grooming any young talented player to do that.
Day 2, 1st session: 69/2 (26), RR: 2.65Day 2: Lunch Break
PAK 397/6 (112) CRR: 3.54
Zimbabar killed the RRPakistan's batting comparison:
Day 1, 1st session: 122/1 (25), RR: 4.88
Day 2, 1st session: 69/2 (26), RR: 2.65
Pathetic approach
We don't have any one who can score consistently at an average of 40+ and with 70+ S/R in our whole domestic cricket.You don’t have anyone who can score 30 off 71?
Yesterday we scored 122 and today just 69. LOLDay 2, 1st session: 69/2 (26), RR: 2.65