musaarthali
First Class Star
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2012
- Runs
- 3,313
1 down 9 to go 

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Time for Trottie to ensure that he is not the one who is booted out when Bell returns
Has Compton been told that his role is to see off the new ball? lol guess that would be somewhat useful, though less so in India, and his strike rate is abysmal
Which Trott are we getting today? Golden duck?
Suddenly the Indian *joke* spinners are looking a bit lethal
Yeah Fatel is in the last chance saloon. He is bowling pies and needs a big innings here to be future scheme of thingsDesperately want Morgan in for Patel.
Joke? these two are rated quite highly
Well, do these two put a zillion revolutions on the ball, like *the best spinner in the world* does?
The donkeys in the sky box are always gunning for Bell. Time for Trott to take some time out and let Bell bat at no. 3Bumble was the only one who was against the inclusion of Trott leading up to this test. All the other commies over Sky were ridiculing and making fun of his opinion.
Bumble must be laughing at them now![]()
Personally I allways thought Ojha is better than Ashwin.... Bhajji is in the team because he is good mates with DhoniSuddenly the Indian *joke* spinners are looking a bit lethal
The donkeys in the sky box are always gunning for Bell. Time for Trott to take some time out and let Bell bat at no. 3
i'm not sure what you mean
My friend, I again repeat that you need an 'English' brain implanted to understand what I meant![]()
The donkeys in the sky box are always gunning for Bell. Time for Trott to take some time out and let Bell bat at no. 3
Well, do these two put a zillion revolutions on the ball, like *the best spinner in the world* does?
You don't half talk some ****e.
Yeah you seem to be an expert in talking and spreading the brown stuff big time.
I hope that if we get to chase a reasonable score in the second dig, Andy Flower re-jigs the batting line up. Cannot have Compton, Trott batting negatively and putting too much pressure on others. May be Broady up the order, eh ?![]()
No offense but when half the time your sarcasm fails, must have something to do with the way you put it.
To understand sarcasm, you need to understand what it's being directed at. If you fail to grasp the gist, then I am sorry.
It is obvious, isn't it ? But there is no proper back-up. Finn, Tremmers are injured and Onions is still finding his way back after a long layoff. And lets not talk about Cheese burger BresnanSome years later, Broad will write a autobiography and claim that he wasnt 100% fit, Carrying injury, ECB forced him play the series and he was shot by pallet while fielding in outfield.
style_guru you just spout uninformed and badly articulated junk all the time, please leave.
You have the audacity to call some Indian commentators as 'Fools' because they had another views about Ashwin's revolutions on the ball.
And then you accuse me of spouting uninformed and badly articulated junk all the time. Sorry but you fail.
He was furious but played it down because ECB requested him. In hindsight he feels he should have brought it up in the media...Some years later, Broad will write a autobiography and claim that he wasnt 100% fit, Carrying injury, ECB forced him play the series and he was shot by pallet while fielding in outfield.
lol what 'views'?
Nobody's views matter.
Swann was found in an independent scientific study to be the current spinner that puts the most revolutions on the ball. So you fail.
Swann was found in an independent scientific study to be the current spinner that puts the most revolutions on the ball.
Murali was cleared by a lab of chucking too, yet we hear you lot as referring to him as a 'Chucker' a lot many times. Same with Ajmal.
Is it necessary to agree with lab results all the time? What's wrong in having a different view? Should anyone be called a fool just for disagreeing, or having a doubt over some lab results?
LMAO cultivating more straw for your worthless arguments by bringing in Murali.
and 'you lot'? Bog off.
The Telegraph, pretty much the most prominent daily source for cricket journalism in the world, reported these results that were noted by Trackman, the most advanced machine for studying spin bowling in the world, at Loughborough, one of the most prominent sporting Universities and centres for athletic excellence in the world.
So if you want to disagree with those results because of Indian commies and the chip on your shoulder...go ahead Newton![]()
You are digging a deeper hole for yourself.
By stating how Swann was tested for revolutions by a prominent university, do you want to imply that ICC's sports lab is not worthy of trust? Lol you lot kept whining about Ajmal's action in UAE, despite him being cleared by ICC big time. So for disagreeing/questioning with ICC's decision, you guy's should also be called 'Fools'
What are you on about? You have comprehensively lost this argument as evidenced by your referencing of first Murali and then Ajmal, who have nothing to do with the debate over Trackman, Loughborough, Swann, or who produces the most revolutions on the ball.
All of the present evidence supports my angle, you have none. You are falling into the trap of centring your argument on the two most naive and transparent logical fallacies in the book: the straw man and the ad hominem. Look into them, do a bit of reading.
And your constant use of 'you lot' is presumptuous, prejudiced and insulting - so get over your chip, brush up on your knowledge, work out a better debating technique and I'll see you next time love.
![]()
Over sensitive Englishman. Hypocrisy personified. Ta