India reach 125-4 at stumps on a rain-shortened Day 2 of the 1st Test against England

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
217,450
India start day 2 in a strong position - England have all the running to do to regain lost ground.

india (1).jpg

A clinical performance from India's four fast bowlers saw Virat Kohli's team finish day one firmly on top, with Jasprit Bumrah leading the charge with four wickets.

Winning the toss, England skipper Joe Root opted to bat first on a wicket with a healthy covering of grass and was left to rue his decision as India's attack took up the challenge with glee.

Spearheaded by Bumrah (4/46) and Mohammad Shami (3/28), the tourists bowled England out for 183 and reached stumps at 21/0, primed to take control of the match. Opting to leave the in-form Ravichandran Ashwin out of the attack to make room for an extra seamer, India's quartet of quicks - Shardul Thakur (2/41) and Mohammad Siraj (1/48) being the others - collected all 10 wickets as England were bowled out in 65.4 overs.

In response, India finished the day at 21/0, with Rohit Sharma (9*) and KL Rahul (9*) at the crease.

The hosts got off to the worst possible start as Bumrah trapped Rory Burns (0) in the front of the stumps in the first over, with England yet to get off the mark.

Zak Crawley then joined Dom Sibley at the crease and the pair were tasked with seeing off the new ball, which was moving through the air and off the deck. They batted patiently, leaving the good deliveries and punishing the bad ones. The Indians resolutely stuck to their task, with challenging spells from Bumrah and Shami, who beat the bat at regular intervals.

The stand was finally broken by Siraj, who got the wicket of Crawley for 27, after a successful review by Kohli. The review was brought on by the persistence of wicketkeeper Rishabh Pant, with DRS confirming an inside edge off the pads and into the gloves of the keeper. It was a brave referral from the Indians, who had been unsuccessful with an lbw appeal they had sent upstairs just three deliveries earlier. The dismissal brought Root out to the middle and the captain struck three consecutive boundaries off Siraj - one an edge over gully - to help England to lunch at 61/2 with the match delicately poised.

It was a near-perfect start in the second session for India, as Sibley's patient knock of 18 came to an end as he went for a flick against Shami, only for the ball to land straight in the hands of Rahul at midwicket.

Back in the Test side, Jonny Bairstow joined his skipper at the crease, and the pair combined in a 72-run stand, which had the hosts nudging the second session in their favour. Root brought up his 50th Test half-century, as the pair mixed caution with aggression. But just on the stroke of tea, Shami struck with excellent in-swinging delivery, trapping Bairstow (29) in front of the stumps. The umpire initially adjudged Bairstow to be not-out, but a successful review by Kohli meant that England would end the second session on 138/4, in 50.2 overs.

Bairstow's dismissal proved the start of the rot for England, with Shami striking again straight after tea, sending the new batsman, Dan Lawrence, back early for a duck. With Shami and Bumrah turning the screws, Jos Buttler endured 16 balls on zero before edging Bumrah behind on the 17th.

Three overs later India got the wicket that mattered most, with Thakur striking with the first delivery of a new spell, trapping Joe Root in front for 64. Thakur was celebrating again three balls later, having Ollie Robinson (0) caught at mid-on. When Bumrah removed Stuart Broad lbw for four, England had slipped from 138/3 to 160/9.

Sam Curran (27*) managed to add a further 23 runs to the scoreboard with James Anderson (1) before the latter had his stumps clattered by a brilliant Bumrah yorker to end England's innings.

Sharma and Rahul dug in through a testing final hour to wrap up the day and ensure it was advantage India at stumps.

==

All posters please take note of the following guidelines for match threads on PakPassion:

1. No personal insults at other posters, players, officials, coaching staffs etc.

2. No making fun of player's, official's, coaching staff's names.

3. Do not add any references to media, their social media or post any pictures or screenshots from other sports websites.

4. Stick to commenting on this match. There is no need to bring other countries into the match discussion as there are plenty of other threads where those discussions can be added.

5. Report abuse. If you see any post which is inappropriate, report it. Do not respond to it.
 
Marcus Trescothick Rues Lack of Red-ball Cricket for England

England batting coach Marcus Trescothick has blamed scheduling and lack of red-ball cricket for the home side’s dismal performance in the first innings of the first Test here. England were bowled out for 183 in the first innings as nine of their batsmen apart from Joe Root could not cross 30.

“Probably not," said Trescothick on being asked if the preparation was ideal.

“Scheduling is always an issue and, trying to get the balance right for the batters moving into Test series, of course you would want them to play a certain amount of red-ball cricket," the former England opener added.

England are coming off white ball series against Sri Lanka and Pakistan. Apart from that, the domestic cricket has involved the T20 Blast and The Hundred competitions.

“We all appreciate that trying to get all the cricket in for what you need for players across the whole summer — county teams, The Hundred, all these competitions going on — there’s no easy solution to get this right and something always has to give."

Trescothick, however, refused to use it as an excuse.

“Of course, we don’t want to use it as an excuse but we’d love to get more time into them at the crease - bowling with the red ball, facing the red ball. But it’s not the way so you have to find a way and get into it in a different fashion."

He called Wednesday’s performance an aberration and promised an improved show from England in the remaining days as well as the rest of the series.

“We’ll go away, lick our wounds and find a way to try and get back in the game. Today has not been the ideal day. Of course not, but that does not define how the rest of the game or the rest of the series is going to go."

He also said that India have improved over the past few years. India had lost the 2018 series 1-4 but since then they have scored two series wins in Australia.

“India are the most potent in comparison to where they have been for the past few years. They have a lot of bases covered. We saw them go to Australia and perform there. So it is no surprise to us. It’s just challenging and we know it’s a real contest. We have to raise our game to match up against their skills."

“They have a good stock currently. They don’t get to the World Test Championship final for no reason."

https://www.news18.com/cricketnext/news/india-vs-england-marcus-trescothick-rues-lack-of-red-ball-cricket-for-england-4047341.html
 
Either Rohit and Rahul hold the opening stand past 50-60 runs, or India will suffer a cluster of wickets.
 
This is what happens when you prepare for a test season with 100 ball cricket :root

India on the other hand have been more diligent than many previous tours of England. They arrived about a week early, have already experienced cricket here earlier in the season, have stayed strong and together in the bubble and so far not made any excuses.

As the day warms up and if the rain stays away, India could get to 250.
 
This is what happens when you prepare for a test season with 100 ball cricket :root

.

Yeah, no. It's another one of those bogus excuses. Do Indian players ever feature in Ranji before a home test series? They still wipe the floor with opposition. Pretty much the same in South Africa where you won't hear their media complaining that ABdV, QdK etc never play in franchise cricket before home tests. And before India manhandled AUS twice in a series in their own den, not many of the AUS players featured in their domestic FC before tests - maybe a solitary match at best.

So this excuse is AS bogus as it gets.
 
Yeah, no. It's another one of those bogus excuses. Do Indian players ever feature in Ranji before a home test series? They still wipe the floor with opposition. Pretty much the same in South Africa where you won't hear their media complaining that ABdV, QdK etc never play in franchise cricket before home tests. And before India manhandled AUS twice in a series in their own den, not many of the AUS players featured in their domestic FC before tests - maybe a solitary match at best.

So this excuse is AS bogus as it gets.

It's not bogus and you have a deep misunderstanding of cricket if you think it is. Now it is not my fault the media entities you mentioned do not raise these issues because they are legitimate issues.

Now, it is not just that some of England's regulars have not played red ball cricket for 2 months or so, it's that they have not played enough cricket regardless. Burns has not played a red ball game since early July, his last bit of cricket was a T20 game where he batted for 1 ball.

There haven't even been warm up games for Root, Johnny, Buttler etc to sink their teeth into.

India do not prepare for home series without arm up games.

And you may also want to look up some of the "excuses" put forward by the Indian media post WTC final loss (pitch, conditions, bowlers not utilising swing, IPL being main focus).
 
It's not bogus and you have a deep misunderstanding of cricket if you think it is. Now it is not my fault the media entities you mentioned do not raise these issues because they are legitimate issues.

Now, it is not just that some of England's regulars have not played red ball cricket for 2 months or so, it's that they have not played enough cricket regardless. Burns has not played a red ball game since early July, his last bit of cricket was a T20 game where he batted for 1 ball.

There haven't even been warm up games for Root, Johnny, Buttler etc to sink their teeth into.

India do not prepare for home series without arm up games.

And you may also want to look up some of the "excuses" put forward by the Indian media post WTC final loss (pitch, conditions, bowlers not utilising swing, IPL being main focus).

Nah, your factually incorrect word salad doesn't help the excuse being bogus.

It's a fact that most of the Indian players do not feature in Ranji before a home series. Same with a lot of Saffer, AUS and even NZ cricketers. Not playing red ball cricket for a couple of months when you are playing at home in familiar conditions is not an excuse.

India media saying that Indian bowlers didn't use swing in WTC final is a criticism, not an excuse. Or do you not know the difference? LMAO.
 
Screenshot_20210805-143423.jpg

Met office today weather prediction ,look like we only get to play one session today .damn
 
Olie Robinson is just too good...most threatning of all English bowlers.
 
They are not even trying to score runs , may end up giving wickets quickly without having much runs on the board
 
These 2 batsmen opening here in test and most probably will do in T20 world cup as well. Such contrasting formats but we would play same openers.
 
Looks like India have worked out that the way to bat in England is the Misbah Tuk Tuk way
 
Stat: This is now the longest opening partnership for India in England since Wasim Jaffer & Dinesh Karthik's 147 run stand in Trent Bridge in 2007 which lasted 42.1 overs
 
Good to see KL Rahul performing with Pant keeping wickets in tests. :inti
 
Looks like India have worked out that the way to bat in England is the Misbah Tuk Tuk way

One of the reasons Pakistan generally do well in England is because most of their batsmen play in the tuk tuk way very well while Indian batsmen would fall for the bait time and again trying to play a booming cover drive. I would say this is a better approach and [MENTION=65183]freelance_cricketer[/MENTION] bhaijaan would be happy that the Indian batsmen are finally learning temperament from the Pak batsmen.
 
England have missed the trick again. They have not gone with Sam Curran yet as he can trouble both the openers by forcing them to play a false shot or just trying to open them up a bit.
 
I am honestly fascinated to see how this will end up.

I have no damn clue.

Looking at the swing available, at first I thought India would get 100 or 150 all out.

But yesterday we batted well.

England's bowling was mostly mediocre.

Today we are batting slowly.

It can either reap big dividends (Pujara, Williamson style) or we might be talking about how it was the wrong move in a couple of hours from now on.

This is one of those pitches where 50/0 can turn into 65/4.....resulting in 120 all out.

Or maybe we could crawl our way to match their score and then take a 50-75 run lead which might prove decisive.

Will be interesting to see for sure.
 
They should score some runs before its too late as rain threat imminent in this test
 
India will give a lead of 300+ and win by an Innings. So far I have a 100% prediction record after retuning from my retirement. :butt
 
Too easy for India at the moment

Not sure what England want to achieve with Sam Curran
 
Sam Curran offering no threat whatsoever. Just leaking runs and wiping out the first innings deficit at will
 
Sam Curran offering no threat whatsoever. Just leaking runs and wiping out the first innings deficit at will

They should have given new bowl to Curran. Indian batsman struggle vs left arm swing. With so many overs bowled, no threat getting Curran on line.
 
Brilliant here from India. I'm not a fan of rohit in tests but he has been very good alongside Rahul. Another 250 runs and I can't imagine England could come back from that.
 
Another no-ball. English bowlers normally don't bowl those many no-balls. IIRC, they didn't bowl a single no-ball during their last series in India.
 
Rohit Sharma once again perishes on a short delivery at boundary.
 
Well I spoke too soon haha

But India are very strong right now. The lead is small, 9 wickets in hand and a toothless bowling attack sorely missi g Wood and Archer.
 
That's why he'll never be a test batsman. Pathetic, absolutely pathetic.
 
It's senseless to give Rohit as many chances in away tests, looks like he won't ever ace away tests.
 
Jofra Archer ruled out of the India Test series, IPL 2021, T20 WC and Ashes due to elbow injury
 
Last edited:
Jofra Archer ruled out of the India Test series, IPL 2021, T20 WC and Ashes due to elbow injury

Sad news for ENG but also cricket in general. A fully fit and firing Jofra makes cricket so much watchable. Hopefully back to peak fitness when IPL 2022 rolls in.
 
Rohit Sharma as Test opener in overseas:

26(77)
52(98)
44(74)
7(21)
34(68)
30(81)
36(107)

He is starting so well but getting dismissed at similar stages time & again - feel for him after working so hard in the tough conditions.
 
Nah, your factually incorrect word salad doesn't help the excuse being bogus.

It's a fact that most of the Indian players do not feature in Ranji before a home series. Same with a lot of Saffer, AUS and even NZ cricketers. Not playing red ball cricket for a couple of months when you are playing at home in familiar conditions is not an excuse.

India media saying that Indian bowlers didn't use swing in WTC final is a criticism, not an excuse. Or do you not know the difference? LMAO.

So Burns played more cricket since? I'd be happy to know which matches he played. Thanks.
 
Atleast Rohit gives good start overseas. We should be happy if he maintains a SENA average of 30+ as at home, he will be averaging 65-70 even at bigger sample size.
 
Rohit Sharma as Test opener in overseas:

26(77)
52(98)
44(74)
7(21)
34(68)
30(81)
36(107)

He is starting so well but getting dismissed at similar stages time & again - feel for him after working so hard in the tough conditions.

I don't think those dismissals are necessarily down to conditions but a lack of grit to get through the quiet moments which is what's needed in test cricket.

Take today's dismissal for example, not swing, not seam, not a hard bouncy wicket, just a mediocre bouncer an over before lunch. Top test openers would duck underneath and leave it a lone, Rohit had to play (he's pretty good at playing the short ball in ODIs). He needs to pick this up quite quickly.
 
So Burns played more cricket since? I'd be happy to know which matches he played. Thanks.

WHat are you even on about? Indian players as well players from other major test nations regularly skip FC cricket and nobody cites that as an excuse. What's so hard for you to comprehend here? Lol
 
The cricketing rules are so archaic - if rain was on the radar, couldnt they have extended yesterday’s play & started early today? Also have a shorter lunch break?
 
Can anyone tell me what happened to Haseeb Hameed?
I remember he debuted in India and looked promising. He had solid technique and i thought he would be natural successor of Alaistar Cook. I can't digest Burns as an opener. His technique is horrendous.
 
Can anyone tell me what happened to Haseeb Hameed?
I remember he debuted in India and looked promising. He had solid technique and i thought he would be natural successor of Alaistar Cook. I can't digest Burns as an opener. His technique is horrendous.

Haseeb Hameed did really well against Pakistan recently. I would have thought he would be an automatic start for an opener after that, but no - English management persists with Burns without any logic.

English test team has too many players who dont belong to this level - Burns, Sibley, Laurence. Even Bairstow & Butler are not red ball players.
 
Pujara fails again, this was on the cards.
 
This is a tricky period for India given that this batch of dukes tends to swing more after 40 overs than when the ball is new.

Anderson coming to the fore with style.
 
LMAO Kohli. Now that's a pathetic waste of space right there.
 
That's why Rohit's harakiri was such a sin on his part.

But some uninformed souls won't accept that.
 
Now wait this thread will be on fire . Morning se slow chalri thi ab dekhna sab Pakistani fans ayenge :sunhappy
 
Anderson goes level with Anil Kumble on the test wicket-taking charts with that dismissal of Kohli.
 
this is going to be tough now suns disappeared cloud cover building, anderson and broad are made for this
 
This is box office Test cricket. What an over from Anderson, what atmosphere in the ground.
 
It's not rohit fault when your star's cant perform .he gave india tremendous start
When you are set and you cross 30 in test cricket, you need to kick on and get 100s. That's what test cricket is all about.

It is never enough to score gritty 30s, what batsmen after you do is immaterial, you need to do your bit.
 
Feeling like 2014 all over for virat in this series .he is in bad form also
 
When you are set and you cross 30 in test cricket, you need to kick on and get 100s. That's what test cricket is all about.

It is never enough to score gritty 30s, what batsmen after you do is immaterial, you need to do your bit.

Thats Rohit limit.

Guaranteed 30 he gives atleast.

Our MO have been frauds for a long time now.

Let them get exposed.
 
Smile is back on Anderson face also on England management .they knew if they get two more wickets indian tail will start .200 looks unlikely for india
 
Any one see the sikh guy in the background when Kohli got out, he was jumping up celebrating and dancing more than the english fans themselves.
 
Back
Top